pietro72ohboy

8 ms·

61.
by pietro72ohboy 4y ago
I don’t think your premise is correct. The holy grail of such systems - Human Intelligence- will also break similarly if it’s asked to identify a car from an undercarriage when the human subject has never ever seen an undercarriage. We real
62.
by pietro72ohboy 4y ago
TikTok’s entire business is built on amplifying and broadcasting a select few “popular” voices, it is not unreasonable to expect that TikTok ensures that there isn’t some patently dangerously advice in these videos. If they can master conte
63.
by pietro72ohboy 4y ago
Reductio ad absurdum just to drown out the merits of the parent post. Your iPad is far more capable than those three devices. It should be able to do what the user would like to do. And an iPad is nowhere close to the safety-critical nature
64.
by pietro72ohboy 4y ago
Samsung is not the only option around. A lot of Chinese OEMs (Vivo et al.) make fantastic android phones at very affordable prices.
65.
by pietro72ohboy 4y ago
And the GNU project. Let’s not forget their contribution to this story!
66.
by pietro72ohboy 4y ago
What abuse are you talking about? Google banned the app. That's it. I have donated to this app and I am genuinely happy with Marcel's efforts to add features. Users aren't always the problem.
67.
by pietro72ohboy 4y ago
Not misleading at all. India is the world’s second largest wheat producer. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_wheat_producti...
68.
by pietro72ohboy 4y ago
Both approaches are correct. The parent is talking about Ablation based importance attribution whereas you’re using gradients to assign importance. Your approach will compute pixel importance in a single step whereas ablation based approach
69.
Ask HN: Is email without 2FA safe?
3 points by pietro72ohboy 4y ago|4 comments