pie

10 ms·

31.
Why Use Make(bost.ocks.org)
358 points by pie 14y ago|240 comments
32.
Single User Utility In A Social System(avc.com)
4 points by pie 14y ago|0 comments
33.
Zeus - Boot any rails app in under a second(github.com)
2 points by pie 14y ago|0 comments
34.
by pie 14y ago
While looking beyond a pg_dump-style approach to backup/recovery, I was considering https://github.com/heroku/WAL-E and discovered Barman. It's also open source, and looks like a strong contender.
35.
Announcing Barman 1.0, Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL(postgresql.org)
1 points by pie 14y ago|0 comments
36.
Barman backup and recovery manager for PostgreSQL(pgbarman.org)
70 points by pie 14y ago|9 comments
37.
by pie 14y ago
Susy ( http://susy.oddbird.net ) is another well-designed option for semantic grids that's been around for awhile.
38.
by pie 14y ago
Looks like this uses themes from over here: http://bootswatch.com/
39.
by pie 14y ago
LaunchRock page.
40.
by pie 14y ago
And sadly, the article "Why You Should Never Pay For Online Dating" bashing match.com was taken down right after the acquisition. Very interesting use of statistics by these guys. There seems to be a mirror here http://interestingreads.pos
41.
by pie 14y ago
Better than what? This doesn't mention any of the other asset management tools out there.
42.
by pie 14y ago
This really ought to include a basic structure for routing, as described in the docs: http://emberjs.com/guides/outlets/ Or maybe not - routing in Ember has changed a lot, even over the last week.
43.
Call For Makers - Maker Faire New York 2012(makerfaire.com)
4 points by pie 14y ago|0 comments
44.
by pie 14y ago
Not trying to knock your article - just wanted to clarify the title, that it's more of a personal "things I learned" than an intro for beginners. I agree that the Ember docs are pretty weak and missing some key pieces that one might miss wh
45.
by pie 14y ago
This is about the author trying to get started with Ember, and doesn't offer anything in the way of helpful guidance for new users. Check out http://emberjs.com/ or http://emberjs.tumblr.com/ for more info.
46.
KSS - Knyle Style Sheets(warpspire.com)
2 points by pie 14y ago|0 comments
47.
by pie 14y ago
I know - but having developed an OT library and read the ShareJS code thoroughly, I think there MAY be 2 edge cases where conflict resolution is not symmetrical for some data types. Or I could be totally wrong. As I mentioned, I hope to con
48.
by pie 14y ago
See also: Google Wave, open-sourced as Apache Wave. http://incubator.apache.org/wave/ The architecture for Wave is really difficult to get a handle on, though. Relative ease of use is a major benefit of ShareJS, though I can't fully vouch
49.
by pie 14y ago
This appears to be a wrapper for PyQt4's QTWebKit. http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/static/Docs/PyQt4/html/q...
50.
NYC TechCrunch Disrupt Hackathon – Workshops & Judges announced(techcrunch.com)
1 points by pie 14y ago|0 comments
51.
by pie 14y ago
This is a long post, but a fascinating dive into the business of music. Here we have facts, hard numbers, more-questionable numbers, anecdotes, experiments, and some rambling hyperbole from an industry veteran. I have rarely seen this kind
52.
Meet The New Boss, Worse Than The Old Boss?(thetrichordist.wordpress.com)
71 points by pie 14y ago|37 comments
53.
by pie 14y ago
Thanks - I've been digging around through the data binding internals of these JS libs and I had indeed forgotten about Angular. I'm comparing details on deferred updates and ease of integrating an OT-type collaboration layer. Derby's alread
54.
by pie 14y ago
I'd be curious to hear any takes on how other similar JS frameworks focused on "live" data binding (particularly Ember, also Knockout) stack up to these two newer players. Clearly Derby and Meteor strive to be more complete end-to-end solut
55.
Our take on Derby vs. Meteor(blog.derbyjs.com)
164 points by pie 14y ago|30 comments
56.
The Future of Magazines Should Look a Lot Like Spotify(pandodaily.com)
1 points by pie 15y ago|0 comments
57.
by pie 15y ago
I find it a little strange that this post mentions Expresso but not its successor Mocha, which appears to have been started about the same time as Whiskey. Anyway, this looks like a valuable contribution, and it's always good to see more we
58.
by pie 15y ago
Right - I'm finding that this behavior (or something related to identification) makes it finnicky to update title/tags, and changes I make in the browser don't always seem to apply, even after resetting the connection. If I edit a URL, stas
59.
by pie 15y ago
Right - but I am curious about how Stashmarks handles conflict resolution, if it does. I naively assume it simply de-dupes URLs, meaning unexpected things could happen with multiple Chromes that aren't running sync or have updates queued wh
60.
by pie 15y ago
Great job. Looks like you're getting hammered with traffic right now, but I'm curious how this holds up with a few synchronized instances of Chrome.

More ›