phyzome

8 ms·

181.
by phyzome 7mo ago
I don't think that's what they meant -- they're describing a series of three imaginary phone calls. (I did misread it that way at first, though.)
182.
by phyzome 7mo ago
Thrive? No. GH has been getting very noticeably worse. The uptime is terrible now and the UI is a lot flakier.
183.
by phyzome 7mo ago
Hard to know with this nondeterministic shit.
184.
by phyzome 7mo ago
That's what labels are for.
185.
by phyzome 7mo ago
Ingenuous question. You know they have a bad reputation. The main problem with pit bulls, AIUI, is that they can be aggressive towards other dogs. Also, assholes buy them (due to their reputation) and then encourage aggressive behavior. I&#
186.
by phyzome 7mo ago
What does it cost you to keep the bug open?
187.
by phyzome 7mo ago
I don't think it depends. Mining practices can be bad even if the minerals are used for a purpose that we judge as good. Those can coexist (in tension, which is where we end up thinking about tradeoffs).
188.
by phyzome 7mo ago
The cobalt thing is apparently misinformation. You've been misled. Technology Connections did a great video that goes into this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM
189.
by phyzome 7mo ago
Firefox for me as well. It's dodgy on some pages, but on larger PRs it now breaks.
190.
by phyzome 7mo ago
I don't know, it's nice that they finally broke native browser in-page search. That's a great feature for people who hate finding things.
191.
by phyzome 7mo ago
Yeah, unclear what they mean. 1/3 the conversion rate, maybe?
192.
by phyzome 7mo ago
Weird, I've never encountered this.
193.
by phyzome 7mo ago
It's funny that you're replying with a recommendation to use LLMs when the parent comment is about how a search engine worked just fine.
194.
by phyzome 7mo ago
Zoom works fine for me on Ubuntu. Or at least, it's no more flaky than it is on Mac.
195.
by phyzome 7mo ago
Pretty upsetting history along with the interesting engineering.
196.
by phyzome 7mo ago
This particular grand structural project was never a good idea, as the video describes. So it might not be the best basis for comparison.
197.
by phyzome 7mo ago
What's the context? I feel like there's at least three paragraphs of intro missing here.
198.
by phyzome 7mo ago
« you are speeding up the rate at which you build the wrong thing » Yeah. I keep seeing this over and over with devs who use LLMs. It's painful to watch.
199.
by phyzome 7mo ago
In the sense that it compels speech, essentially? Hmm.
200.
by phyzome 7mo ago
It took me a bit, but the choppy, repetitive sentence structure eventually became apparent.
201.
by phyzome 7mo ago
I've looked at the bill and it sure seems like it would apply to Linux. What's your case that it doesn't?
202.
by phyzome 7mo ago
This doesn't meaningfully increase risk to the Debian project, which is already one of the most prominent Linux projects.
203.
by phyzome 7mo ago
Well, that's not what the page describes. You'd have to train an LLM on everything except tldraw, then use that LLM for code generation.
204.
by phyzome 7mo ago
For each project you want to rip off, you'd have to first train an entirely new LLM on all sources except for the target project. Prohibitively expensive.
205.
by phyzome 7mo ago
It absolutely was.
206.
by phyzome 7mo ago
Flagging this because 1) this was written by an LLM and 2) there's bad information in it, which means it wasn't reviewed particularly carefully by a human. This means the entire article is suspect as a result.
207.
by phyzome 8mo ago
I've seen a variety of approaches used (I'm not usually the one doing the confronting) but I still haven't seen any shame, etc. Which is weird, because it's not like it's one monolithic group? But it's still wh
208.
by phyzome 8mo ago
...normally browsers don't crash at all. Something's wrong with your computer.
209.
by phyzome 8mo ago
I've yet to see a slopper show any kind of shame.
210.
by phyzome 8mo ago
Verify? Seems like no one is even reviewing this stuff.

More ›