philk

152 ms·

1. 601.▲
   by philk 17y ago

   It's an interesting idea, but I can think of three other possible explanations for the individuals who rise to the top being the least adept at research: 1) The individuals who rise to the top may be the most socially/politically able - dev
2. 602.▲
   by philk 17y ago

   People aren't "letting the state do their thinking for them". More correctly, members of the anti-vaccine movement don't seem to be doing much thinking at all: 1) Why has the anti-vaccine movment failed to produce any credible evidence at
3. 603.▲
   by philk 17y ago

   I'm unsure of the advantages you describe in your second paragraph: 1) Seasonal isn't an advantage; I'd much rather be able to enjoy broccoli (or whatever) all year round rather than have to make do with it for a quarter of the year. 2) Loc
4. 604.▲
   by philk 17y ago

   The ability (and willingness) to pay to pitch to angel investors is a filter of a kind, but it's selecting for traits that you don't want in startup founders: 1) An inability to network and sell - if they can't get to see angel investors wi
5. 605.▲
   by philk 17y ago

   Focusing on just a few things is a great idea. However, in his case study he doesn't list any outcomes. He describes what he's going to do. I think it would have worked better if he'd implemented it, then posted this in a months time and s