philippejara

21 ms·

91.
by philippejara 4y ago
a...brianna wu tweet? are we in 2015 again? How is she being quoted talking about stock prices
92.
by philippejara 4y ago
>And when you consider that hard drives have stagnated in price over the past few years, YouTube is doomed if it does not delete unprofitable videos Not necessarily, is storage(and not retrieval) that much of a cost? and if so is youtube
93.
by philippejara 4y ago
longer than 4 years is normal, expected even, but when you start going into >7 years it gets...weird.
94.
by philippejara 4y ago
could you give me an example of him "taking the side" of trump? all I remember is him trying to not be fast and loose with the facts to beat the dead horse the entire media was already doing, themselves unconcerned with the truth
95.
by philippejara 4y ago
I still stand confused as to what relation it has to the topic
96.
by philippejara 4y ago
are there no maximum time for a course in the US? where i'm from if you take more than 50% of the time the course would normally take you just lose it
97.
by philippejara 4y ago
Tech journalism most often then not doesn't know tech in the first place.Safe from a very small number, often in specialized outlets like techdirt, they're effectively "culture" journalists in regards to social media, so
98.
by philippejara 4y ago
I fail to see how having a law against incitement in germany - that doesn't even sound like would apply to jan 6th if it was done there- makes the article of merkel and several other EU leaders condemning twitter's action not ma
99.
by philippejara 4y ago
and hopefully he'll get prosecuted for it if it is really the case, but that didn't stop even european leaders from saying the ban was a mistake and concerning[0]. [0]: https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart
100.
by philippejara 4y ago
is it a conspiracy theory because they said it was? you don't know and neither do I, it does sound like he thought that asking the NSA for what he has a right to ask for, a warrant to give up data, wouldn't impact his chances of r
101.
by philippejara 4y ago
I'm not going to claim to be an american law expert, but when the agencies can just say "nope" to evidence against them in said court of law, it becomes hard to claim strong legal protections. I may be wrong and misunderstand
102.
by philippejara 4y ago
Greenwald stuck to his guns as he always did when his audience decided that they'd rather embrace the overbearing/surveillance state as long as the court jester didn't win the election again, that's how I see it at least
103.
by philippejara 4y ago
>In short, the collective well-being of humanity should always be a top priority, and this includes moderating harmful or extremist content on the internet. Who defines what is harmful or extremist in the government? Sounds like you eith
104.
by philippejara 4y ago
One would hope that after the patriot act, the bush jr wars, cablegate, the nsa leaks and so on just in the last 20 years people would desire to not keep the old habits, but I suppose all it took was one buffoon to take presidency and all t
105.
by philippejara 4y ago
It's a huge case being watched by the entire world, even if there is a minuscule chance of it causing an actual issue, or there is the possible bad optics, I fail to see why the judge wouldn't do it. Nobody is going to excuse them
106.
by philippejara 4y ago
"oh I need to structurally modify these 20 lines, might as well craft a regex to do it" 30 minutes later... well got to keep my regex skills up to date else i'll lose them
107.
by philippejara 4y ago
why do you want bigger productions? especially now where we have the new lord of the rings, the MCU, the DCU and a new avatar that will most likely be forgotten just as quickly as the previous one to show for bigger budget productions. Ther
108.
by philippejara 4y ago
Like elon or not it makes absolutely no sense to compare social media with effectively newspapers, they're completely different things. The only comparison I guess you could realistically have is zuckerberg, but even then it wouldn&#x2
109.
by philippejara 4y ago
I can guarantee you there are plenty of people who do, you really don't need an ex-social media CEO or whatever to do it. Would be absolutely hilarious if he somehow managed to get moot to be the CEO.
110.
by philippejara 4y ago
I don't disagree that dedicated servers only would be better, much to the contrary, but sadly matchmaking is here to stay and there's nothing we can do about it. You can have parallel dedicated servers that have no impact at all o
111.
by philippejara 4y ago
I can play the game in the hardware that it was advertised to work at the time, 32bit(?) macs, the same way I can play a ps2 game on a ps2 but not a ps5. Removing official servers when there is no alternative means I can't use the prod
112.
by philippejara 4y ago
you can just disable cosmetic drops/leveling/whatever else on private servers since it's sadly such a massive part of multiplayer games nowadays, problem solved.
113.
by philippejara 4y ago
Honestly the saddest part is how you could have both the private servers and matchmaking almost seamlessly, have official servers flagged for matchmaking and allow for a server browser like csgo, team fortress 2, etc, and yet so many act as
114.
by philippejara 4y ago
let's not turn this into a chain of saying obvious things that everyone involved already knows about, it's not going to add to the conversation and -hopefully- nor will it give you internet points in this website.
115.
by philippejara 4y ago
everyone knows that public transport is the solution to it but I can't buy a railroad track and a train to take to work so people are going to do what they can do
116.
by philippejara 4y ago
the account that hosted his clip wasn't suspended, it was deleted, doesn't seem like anyone banned it. for example here's a banned account: https://twitter.com/h3h3productions/ here's the account t
117.
by philippejara 4y ago
I don't get your point, I want to be anonymous generally and am all for it, but the risks being cited for half the article have been known for a decade already and it's pointless wasting this much time on it as if it were news.
118.
by philippejara 4y ago
he already specified it in is his comment: > In the case of USDC it allows USD to exist on the blockchain so that it can interact with smart contracts. if you wanna question whether smart contracts are useful or not feel free, I sure do,
119.
by philippejara 4y ago
I'm not sure why they ham up the risk of privacy loss regarding unmasking anon players, the only "risk" I can think of would be someone developing and testing new strategies but then I'd assume the fingerprinting would b
120.
by philippejara 4y ago
Indeed false advertising is a thing and it's not legal(depending on where you live ? it is in most of the world that has teslas at least). The government reaching further than going for false advertising is where the slope gp mentioned

More ›