Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pgeorgi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
241.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
> And if the harpejji was invented in 2007, then I believe it should go out of patents next year? Patent lifetimes are at least 20 years after the filing date as per TRIPS treaty. There's the priority mechanism for international fil
242.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
Maybe: "AI startups raised billions of dollars" => "The megacorps had to jump into that market, relatively unprepared, to avoid surprises down the road" => "The megacorps couldn't pull through with even m
243.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
> Not exactly cherry-picked, these were from things I submitted myself and noticed that were shadow flagged. Definitely not random, in any case. > Also, even if "balanced" censorship was the desired goal, Nobody claimed that
244.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
That's what "random 10 out of 67k sites" gives you. Your set was cherry-picked, dang's wasn't. That said, dailykos.com seems to be banned. Happy now?
245.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
Google has tons of office real estate that's assigned a certain value on balance sheets. If that tanks, the C-suite compensation plans and (slight conjecture here) the value of Brin's & Page's stock-secured liquidity will
246.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
Proprietary software is "viral", indeed. As soon as it's part of a combined work, the entire work devolves into proprietary software.
247.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
They push to their own server and ask you to pull from there. See https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/6/25/128 for an example.
248.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
That's something the church decided to set up. Being a member of an organization means following their rules, and yes, that can become complex when you're in an organization with many chapters (e.g. international) where each chapt
249.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
> If it was BS, I would expect Suse to deny, and blame it on a disgruntled ex employee. Denying bullshit gives it more coverage. Sometimes it's smarter to just wait it out, and have whatever bullshit comes next (targetted at somebod
250.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
> The state even collects the tithe! Separation of state and church... It's a collection service to simplify processes that costs the religious or philosophical organizations who participate (not all do) about 3% of their revenue. A
251.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
https://store.planetcom.co.uk/products/gemini-pda-wifi-only was an option but sadly they pivoted to devices with baseband only... There's https://pyra-handheld.com/ but it's semi-existent not
252.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
Try : + drop drop 5 ;
253.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
> it's a 300mm fab. 300mm wafer diameter, yes. That's state of the art, with some vendors looking at 450mm with little to show for now.
254.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
Because Qualcomm _really_ dislikes letting others take a look at their (usually very boring) secret sauce. Even partners working on projects shoveling revenue counted with a sizable number of digits their way. That's also why QCSBI (or
255.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
RISC-V is the ISA plus some auxiliary specs. A CPU, and even more so a SoC, contains enough other stuff that Qualcomm can torment their partners (and their lawyers) with. And of course they will do that.
256.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
This is a thread about Qualcomm looking into RISC-V. Seeing how "great" their ARM-based designs are, they will manage to make a real mess out of SBI soon enough and there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. I'll stock up o
257.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
There's Open Source SMM as well (e.g. https://review.coreboot.org/plugins/gitiles/coreboot/+/HEAD/... ) and it's still a pain. "There's services outside the kernel's control
258.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
ARM: "This document defines the Boot and Runtime Services expected by an enterprise platform Operating System or hypervisor, for an SBSA-compliant Arm AArch64 server which follows the UEFI and ACPI specifications." ( https:/&
259.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
That's a reasonable approximation of the stance adopted by the French monarchy. Improve quality of life for "everyone" if you want to achieve a different outcome for your kin.
260.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
Because Microsoft, Apple and Mozilla can still exert pressure: "Support this feature we enabled and benefit from 20% less traffic with users of our browsers" and "Use Edge/Safari/Firefox to browse the web faster (an
261.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
Under US law, typefaces aren't copyrightable, and even in other copyright regimes, they only get a shorter protection duration. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property_protecti... for an overview.
262.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
- Polyfills (there _is_ polyfill-enabling code - maintained by Chrome devs.) - Microsoft enabling the flag in Edge by default and telling people that websites can be 30% smaller/faster in Edge, automatically adding JXL conversion in th
263.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
Same with av1. It's not verbatim vp10, but incorporates concepts developed by xiph.org and Cisco (and whoever else).
264.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
That article you post as [1] refers to https://opensource.org/osd/ for "The official definition of open source software (which is published by the Open Source Initiative and is too long to include here)" The
265.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
JPEG XL can losslessy transcode JPEG into a smaller format. JPEG2000 (or WebP or anything but Lepton[0]) didn't offer that. Besides, we have gif and png for approximately the same space. gif still isn't gone. Displacement isn'
266.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
According to the article, WebP requires more CPU to decode. JPEG XL also supports lossless transcoding from JPEG, so it could be used for old image sets with no loss in image fidelity. There are arguments for the new format, but the Chrome
267.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
Provide alternative formats, making the browser autoselect. Or provide a JXL polyfill. In either case: Have Chrome telemetry report home that "user could have 20% faster page load with JXL support".
268.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
JPEG2000 ran into a patent license trap. JPEG XL is explicitly royalty free.
269.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
> so do we think Chrome will reverse their decision to drop support? The argument was that there's no industry support (apparently this means: beyond words in an issue tracker), let's see how acceptance is with Safari supportin
270.
▲
by
pgeorgi
3y ago
You replied to "You deny your users the most basic freedom there is, the freedom to use your software for any purpose without discrimination." and caim that open source isn't about that. Let's see https://open
More ›