Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pferde
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
301.
▲
Home Invasion – Mastodon's Eternal September Begins
(hughrundle.net)
9 points
by
pferde
4y ago
|
4 comments
302.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Indeed. I like this article/transcript, because it has a lot of criticism about the horrible state this whole "web3" thing is, while remaining cautiously optimistic about its future.
303.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
For now, after logging in, it only says: "You're here early! We can't wait to show you the new Teams, but we're not quite ready for you. We'll let you know when it's time." As a daily Linux MS Teams user a
304.
▲
Is Web3 Bullshit? (Transcript)
(blog.mollywhite.net)
124 points
by
pferde
4y ago
|
176 comments
305.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Absolutely, yes to all of that. (Off topic, but I love the juxtaposition of your handle and the topic being discussed. :) )
306.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
A thousand times this. Shellcheck is a godsend that will save you tons of headaches if you have to deal with longer shell scripts - whether you are writing new scripts or maintaining old ones.
307.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Are you one of those people who take everything literally, so any and all jokes fly far over their heads? This rule of ten lines or less is clearly meant as an illustrative guideline. Obviously if you have a shell script that has 11 lines,
308.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Wait, what? The way to pay for things you need to function in society are taxes, and direct payments coming out of your wages (or equivalent thereof). Ads are something completely disconnected from "things you need to function in socie
309.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
The main difference here is that on the web, you can get rid of the ads *for yourself and yourself only*, without affecting anyone else. You are merely processing the incoming stream of data in a different way. In the real world, there is n
310.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
I do not believe it's nitpicking. I was supporting the post you replied to ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33313036 ), which claimed that git indeed does not have review tools, and that the review tools/flows
311.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
I am not doubting you, but I'm surprised that it was cheaper. Every time this is discussed here on HN, or on other forums, the prevailing narrative is that it is increasingly difficult to buy a non-smart TV, and that the only option is
312.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Yes, but you do not reply via git. You review the patches in the MUA of your choice (outside of git) or in editor or IDE of your choice, after applying them in your local repository clone (applied maybe by git, maybe by the "patch"
313.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Exactly - don't pay money, make your user agent work for you, the user.
314.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
I know of at least three huge, multi-national corporations using Github extensively - either via separate, protected orgs and repos directly on github.com, or a separate Github Enterprise instances on their own domains.
315.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Those are tools to facilitate moving the code from one repo to another, not to facilitate a review of that code. So I think the GP's point stands.
316.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Yes, you can get that badge safely only if you adjust your project's development flow. This exactly proves the central point of the article - gamification affects software developers.
317.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Lot of emphasis by whom? Yes, certain constructs are subtly encouraged (by documentation, community blogs, etc.), but there is no python police to enforce the One True Way(tm). You can still write your quick&dirty prototype using not-qu
318.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
It's not even in the "old" days, what you described is still the situation today, for C and C++ languages - as I'm sure you are aware. You have to know about all your dependencies, and curate them all manually. This desp
319.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
That is an odd take on Python particularly, which has been widely lauded as a good language for exploratory coding - easy and quick to put something together and iterate on it. You seem to be claiming the opposite here.
320.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
A good first approximation of such a setting is to never publish on Github in the first place. Of course, someone else can still upload your elsewhere-published code to GH. You cannot win.
321.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
No javascript, no paywall. Just the meat of the article, as web was meant to be. :)
322.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Yeah, if my employer wants me to use a smartphone app, they better cough up a smartphone for me to use. I'm not installing anything work-related on my private one, because I am in no position to guarantee that I won't break it or
323.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
No, you're moving the goalposts. You were specifically talking saying "to wirelessly read a few specific bytes of data from the brain of an unknowing person". You do not read bytes of data from the brain, because there are no
324.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Not necessarily. A person could remember a password that contains name of their loved one differently in their brain than some arbitrary string of letters and numbers. Those letters and numbers can each be "encoded" differently in
325.
▲
Log4j Software Flaw 'Endemic,' New Cyber Safety Panel Says
(securityweek.com)
1 points
by
pferde
4y ago
|
0 comments
326.
▲
Global automakers face electric shock in China
(reuters.com)
2 points
by
pferde
4y ago
|
1 comments
327.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
What about e-mail clients which allow you to configure multiple accounts at different e-mail providers? Those will be able to access your Gmail data, and also "data from or through third-party servers" in form of receiving or send
328.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
I tried using Nextcloud several times in the past, but the experience on Android was always sketchy for me. Contacts and calendar that would randomly (and silently) stop synchronizing, their mobile app stuck on endless spinner when browsing
329.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
The history of that entire fiasco is quite comprehensivly summarized at https://phil.tech/2013/wtf-is-t-paamayim-nekudotayim/ .
330.
▲
by
pferde
4y ago
Please read the original post - the QR code (nor the TOTP secret in any other format) is simply not available until you enable either SMS authentication or the authentication app. Afterwards, yes, you have the TOTP secret available for use
More ›