Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
petersellers
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
Either way, people have options now. If one doesn't like the compromises of the thin phone, they can buy the thick phone. Seems silly to complain about the thinness if you're not the target demographic.
32.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
I find Silksong to be easier than at least Cuphead and Super Meat Boy, but I could totally see how one who isn't experienced with platformers may find it frustratingly challenging.
33.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
When dealing with timestamps, it's easiest to store and process them in UTC for as much of your code as possible. This means pretty much all of your backend and database code. Only convert these values from UTC to other timezones whe
34.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
There's a lot of assumptions being made in this comment and none of them are correct.
35.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
> Twitter/X is the reason DJT became President. I really don't think so, at least not in isolation. It probably contributed a small part but the right wing media machine is multi-faceted. There were a lot of podcasters (i.e.
36.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
Limits the blast radius to only the files that the more limited user has write access to.
37.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
It's still easier if you use virtual environments so infrequently that you have to look up how to do it every time.
38.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
Or: `uvx ruff` Which one is easier to run, especially for someone who doesn't use python everyday?
39.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
> it’s always been done in that ENVs python shell . What if you don't have an environment set up? I'm admittedly not a python expert by any means but that's always been a pain point for me. uvx makes that so much easier.
40.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
Hyper-V is a type 1 hypervisor, so Linux and Windows are both running as virtual machines but they have direct access to hardware resources. It's possible that Apple has implemented a similar hypervisor here.
41.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
> In your own words, a project that would take 5-10 engineers is now feasible to be tackled with 1 or 2. Your own words. That statement != lower demand for software engineers. If a firm needs to perform project X that previously cost 10
42.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
I disagree strongly with this conclusion. I've seen firsthand what happens to large software projects that collapse under their own weight of tech debt. The software literally could not function as intended - customers were lost, the
43.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
I didn't frame it that way - perhaps you are thinking of the person you replied to? Nevertheless, I don't think they are trying to frame it that way, either. The point is that making software development easier can actually incre
44.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
If a business has the budget for 1 or 2 engineers though, they might be able to task them with work that previously required 5-10 engineers (in theory, anyways).
45.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
I'm not so sure that would work well in practice. How would the inexperienced developer know that the code created by the AI was correct? What if subtle bugs are introduced that the inexperienced developer didn't catch until it
46.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
I understand what you are saying, I just don't agree with it. "AI" is not going to wholesale replace software development anytime soon, and certainly not within a year's time because of the reasons I mentioned. The way
47.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
If replacing Jira is really as easy as you claim, then it would have happened by now. At the very least, we'd be getting hit by a deluge of HN posts and articles about how to spin up your very own project management application with a
48.
▲
by
petersellers
1y ago
The person you are replying to isn't claiming that the seller pays the tariffs, they are saying that it's not in the seller's interest to notify buyers of the tariff charge because it's essentially free anti-tariff messa
49.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
> as for Spotify: https://bit.ly/samson_music I'm not sure what you are trying to say here - that this website is comparable to Spotify? Even if you are talking about just the "core experience", this exam
50.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
I don't have friends for the sake of "having friends". I choose the people I want to hang out with because I enjoy their company and like/respect them. Being around them makes me happy. Similarly, people I dislike (rud
51.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
That is far different (and much less severe) than the original claim of accelerationism that was being made earlier.
52.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
> Lots options. All require a united front. So in other words "no options" because we will never have a unified front in the legislative branch.
53.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
The USG is pretty old at this point, so that's not too surprising. I wonder if their newer hardware suffers from the same issues.
54.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
I had to check your account to see whether it was made just for this comment. Well done!
55.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
> The audience of people that would get a Steam Deck and then emulate Switch games is so small that this is a no-issue for Nintendo Given how Nintendo handled the situation with Ryujinx and Yuzu, they clearly thought it was an issue for
56.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
Not true in New York, where this particular trial took place. From your own link: S 380.30 Time for pronouncing sentence. In general. Sentence must be pronounced without unreasonable delay. Court to fix time. Upon entering a convi
57.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
> The person in question, Trump, was not sentenced and therefore not "convicted" of anything. Sentencing != conviction. Conviction is the legal finding of guilt, sentencing is the appropriation of punishment. Given your excess
58.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
> The point being, you can't just assume corporate taxes are always paid by the rich or the owners of the company. I was just pulling the numbers off of the source you gave. I'm not sure what methodology they used to compute t
59.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
Thank you for clarifying and providing that source, it's very informative. The numbers I was looking at before were referring to the overall tax rate, which included both income tax and corporate taxes. With that said, the overall tax
60.
▲
by
petersellers
2y ago
Federal Receipts as a percent of GDP doesn't address my point whatsoever. GDP is not income. Federal receipts aggregated across all tax brackets provides zero information about what the highest tax bracket paid.
More ›