Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
peteradio
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Let me tell you about my LLM project called grandma. It's fine tuned in order to replace your grandma but in principle it could replace your great-grandma.
92.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Why should decline be exponential?
93.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
How about they just put a checkbox in the settings (checked by default of course) to install the malware. If you have a problem with it you can navigate to the settings and uncheck the install malware box. Now of course you may need to ch
94.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
If you've worked on building any simple little object you know King Murphy sabotages all steps. The problem with Mr. Murphy is that he doesn't tell you when he's going to strike. Having a Murphy Larper would at least give y
95.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Haha, sourcecode routinely doesn't exist to be scrutinized (despite company policy). Just modify the code in prod who's going to go poking around after you there?
96.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
One 1 hour doing code review is not really stolen from doing feature work really is it? For the vast majority its stolen from playing video games or some other non-work.
97.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
The social order is fundamentally nepotistic. Family/Tribe/Caste matters more than experience/performance within the managerial bubble. Keeping the actual workers down helps to keep them desperate to put food on the table,
98.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
> I hope his replacement is more like the pre-merger CEOs than the accounting-focused recent ones. ... womp womp
99.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Yes! Incompetent manager: "Hey uh can you pop open that firewall for me?" Me: "That's against corporate policy. You'd need to follow procedure xyz." Incompetent manager: "My good friend, J could open that
100.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
I've seen this happen. Start pushing off the work of the old job and doing the new job before the promotion.
101.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
How have you ever gotten the full story so many times to know that these people exist in such numbers? You'd have to hear their bad idea (apparently be intelligent enough to understand them completely) and then you'd also be ther
102.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Look buddy if you don't like your freedom panels then you can giiiiiiiiiiiit out.
103.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Conspiracy... some adversary is waiting for opportunities during unfavorable/aberrant conditions and triggering simple failures at impossibly inopportune times. Without any redundancy, conditions it looks like a freak accident. It wo
104.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Somebody should do a side-by-side of that scene with this threads scene in gif.
105.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
It looks like the nominal trajectory takes it very close to the pylon. Why wouldn't nominal be towards the middle of the two pylons?
106.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Why don't they just fine the shit out of that rocket boat company every time they pull that outrageous prank? Or throw someone in jail. Who thinks that is in any an ok prank? Can you imagine someone doing that in a car? Its just a
107.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
> Mines are starting to convert fleets into self driving trucks. What mines?
108.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Or it could wind up being a pretty big waste of resources. On the one hand you have the ability to extract "apparent knowledge" in a conversational form. On the other hand you are killing the ability to create new knowledge and
109.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
How well does that utility argument play out when companies see fit to grant 0 dividend?
110.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Does trading stocks somehow cause an increase production of actual stuff? If not, I don't see how everyone ends up better off.
111.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
At the end of the day nothing about the number of commits was used in your thoughtful analysis, it was only the contents of the commits which you attribute any value.
112.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
I've never seen a person with those titles. On the cloud we are all just developers.
113.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
> It appears to have been an infrastructure security vulnerability in the Change Healthcare business unit UHG developers would be responsible for the infrastructure right? And wouldn't Change have been brought under the UHG network
114.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Inevitably the cause of the breach will be something like an open firewall.
115.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
> The Biden administration announced Wednesday that it has launched an investigation into the company due to the “unprecedented magnitude of the cyberattack.” Let the coverup begin, well actually they probably started wiping days after t
116.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Something that only lasts 30 days is going to partially start breaking down on day 1, I don't think people want that touching their meat.
117.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
1M is the target today. What does that have to do with 50 years from now?
118.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
But its Agile! This way you can release a known broken product and "fix" it for the next decade under a maintenance contract.
119.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
6 degrees of separation between bacon and anything else.
120.
▲
by
peteradio
3y ago
Personal bubble deflation
More ›