petegrif

21 ms·

181.
by petegrif 14y ago
A lot of the comments, imho, don't seem to understand Andrew Chen's post and are just fixating on some of the terminology. In fairness it would be easier to do so had the reader of this post been a regular reader of his blog. It is more r
182.
by petegrif 14y ago
Cool dog.
183.
by petegrif 14y ago
Stalking - excellent!
184.
by petegrif 14y ago
Agreed. <2000 is pretty common.
185.
by petegrif 14y ago
Mind blowing. And so great you publish it all to improve the product.
186.
by petegrif 14y ago
This is a BIG problem for my use case. Worrying. I applaud the motivation but am very disturbed by the unilateral way this has been sprung on us.
187.
by petegrif 14y ago
I'm sorry. This is NOT a meaningful channel. And this is NOT appropriate communication. But to be honest, what I find most scary about this is the fact that you think it is.
188.
by petegrif 14y ago
Good god.
189.
by petegrif 14y ago
You know as well as I do that you can't. It is an absolutely absurd statement. This is just typical of a lot of the completely misinformed nonsense that passes for comment on patents.
190.
by petegrif 14y ago
Yeah - I was pretty amused by that one.
191.
by petegrif 14y ago
This is a horrible article. It makes no effort to seriously examine the issues. It is just a rant. If this is what passes for journalism then god help us all.
192.
by petegrif 14y ago
Semantec has done several detailed analyses of Stuxnet. They are in no doubt this was an extremely well resourced project that was state financed.
193.
by petegrif 14y ago
This post makes an extremely important and very very very poorly understood point. You are absolutely correct that whilst the conventional wisdom is that the US nuked Japan to avoid the loss of 500,000 lives invading the mainland the histo
194.
by petegrif 14y ago
Yes.
195.
by petegrif 14y ago
I think the (debatable ) key point here is that the treaty was a bargain between the then possessors of nuclear weapons and non-nuclear states. The deal was that non-nuclear states wouldn't develop weapons and the nuclear states would disa
196.
by petegrif 14y ago
Wow. That is truly weird.
197.
by petegrif 14y ago
This is interesting - who is doing this? and where?
198.
by petegrif 14y ago
I wouldn't have any problem hiring him. And I'm sure I am not alone in feeling this way.
199.
by petegrif 14y ago
Very cool.
200.
by petegrif 14y ago
Very true.
201.
by petegrif 14y ago
Spell 'seasoned' properly.
202.
by petegrif 14y ago
Tillbrook - might of known his team would win. Anyone else remember tips and arlo?
203.
by petegrif 14y ago
Love the pencil. Nice period touch.
204.
by petegrif 15y ago
Unless I missed it there is one key point the the article didn't mention. The strength of the web is links and hence the ability to access anything that we can uniquely identify as a resource. Apps don't have links.
205.
by petegrif 15y ago
Cool.
206.
by petegrif 15y ago
It is obviously not proposing 'watering down' anything. All it recommends is a recognition that people come to college with very different degrees of experience and that it can be intimidating and offputting to the less experienced. As th
207.
by petegrif 15y ago
Great piece - thanks.
208.
by petegrif 15y ago
I strongly recommend 'A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the World's Largest Experiment Reveals about Human Desire' by Sai Gaddam and Ogi Ogas. It's big data applied to the study of human sexuality. Essential reading!
209.
by petegrif 15y ago
"...not that it should be their choice in the first place." what the heck does that mean????????
210.
Google search problems - is it just me?
1 points by petegrif 15y ago|0 comments

More ›