permo-w

5 ms·

31.
by permo-w 8mo ago
For 1300 the only words I'm not sure of are "swie" and "rewth", although from context they presumably mean something like "silence" and "mercy" 1200 is much harder but I can get maybe 60-75%: Hit
32.
by permo-w 8mo ago
surely "paining" is the easiest way to comprehend it
33.
by permo-w 8mo ago
If I were an intelligence agency wanting to throw people off my scent, maybe I'd set up or pay off a blogger to track down my site's "owner" and then do some immature shit in response to absolutely confirm forever that t
34.
by permo-w 8mo ago
They could just buy Sponsorblock
35.
by permo-w 8mo ago
I could be wrong, but I think I've seen it fail on more obscure sites. But yeah it seems unlikely they're maintaining so many premium accounts. On the other hand they could simply be state-backed. Let's say there are 1000 lik
36.
by permo-w 8mo ago
I never said that modding isn't important, I said that it's not as important as people in this thread are making it out to be
37.
by permo-w 8mo ago
These are minor tweaks. You could remove these and the speedrunning community/HC would lose little. A second account in spectator mode is a slightly less convenient version of freecam and the speedrunning community is kidding themselve
38.
by permo-w 8mo ago
Also redstone is different, there's no F3 menu, generally far less vanilla customisability, far more micro-transaction prompting, far fewer commands and I'm sure 20 other things that someone who has actually played Bedrock recentl
39.
by permo-w 8mo ago
(Not saying you are but) I think people here are overstating modding and understating Bedrock's inferiority for content creation. The bugs, the differing technical surface and redstone logic, the basic missing key technical features fr
40.
by permo-w 8mo ago
Put more simply, a large proportion of the existing playerbase, including most large content creators, despises Bedrock.
41.
by permo-w 8mo ago
or potentially the account posting it
42.
by permo-w 8mo ago
Do it
43.
by permo-w 8mo ago
What percentage of YouTube's revenue do you think is from subs? The slop is already there. Even without the slop, which it would be borderline impossible to identify en masse, the hosting costs are still astronomical. I appreciate your
44.
by permo-w 8mo ago
It would be dead. Google would shut it down or sell it, but who is going to buy billions of dollars a year in costs for no advertising revenue in return? Youtube's hosting costs would put a massive dent in even some hypothetical really
45.
by permo-w 8mo ago
It's the eternal hacker news debate: "let's regulate x" "but surely we can't regulate x because defining x is complicated" "plenty of things are complex and are regulated, also here is a definition th
46.
by permo-w 8mo ago
And it's part owner of the forces keeping fundamentalist religion under wraps too. Why fight over god when you can fight over your football team or your games console or your phone brand or your car
47.
by permo-w 8mo ago
The major loss would be Youtube. Youtube is possibly the greatest educational tool the world has ever seen. Yeah there's some bad stuff, but you want to know how to do almost anything from tying your shoelaces to building a mega laser
48.
by permo-w 8mo ago
I'm sure this is part of it, but I suspect it goes deeper than that. I'd guess they probably have some kind automated categorisation algorithm that can extract features from the videos
49.
by permo-w 8mo ago
I absolutely get what you're saying in theory--discussions about how and why are far more valuable than dialectic no yes no yes no yes debates--but in practice for this case, I feel like those how why conversations would perhaps feel a
50.
by permo-w 8mo ago
And yet consistently the arguments you hear against regulation are these "let's pretend there's no such thing as nuance, how can we ever regulate an extreme case of something when we don't regulate minor cases?" arg
51.
by permo-w 8mo ago
The secret is how it chooses videos to recommend, not the tech stack it uses and how fast it is
52.
by permo-w 8mo ago
I'm sorry to point out the obvious here, but who is going to perceive their recommended feed as slow or unfresh if it doesn't learn from exactly the last video you clicked on within 1 second? The bar simply is not that high. The s
53.
by permo-w 8mo ago
You think that that's not been the case for the entirety of human history?
54.
by permo-w 8mo ago
Read the comment and then reply.
55.
by permo-w 8mo ago
There are some countries in East Asia that would be able to disagree with this
56.
by permo-w 8mo ago
What is a rhetorical game if "ignoring the entire comment and then complaining you didn't answer one question that's entirely irrelevant to the central point" isn't? Read the comment again and try to figure out why
57.
by permo-w 8mo ago
That's simply a logical conclusion from your own thought process. You keep saying that any job is okay if the person is desperate. i.e. it's okay to force people to do what you want if they've got no other choice
58.
by permo-w 8mo ago
Your perspective is consistently too black and white. No one in this comment chain has once said that this should not be allowed. At most it's been said that paying poor people to take trauma is concerning. Your response has consistent
59.
by permo-w 8mo ago
>Have you considered that I have more knowledge of poverty, not because I have experienced it, but because I have spent time understanding it? If this is true, you haven't shown any evidence of it. >Lets make it clear here: peopl
60.
by permo-w 8mo ago
He likely betrayed his real motivations a few comments back. He's annoyed about candidates getting elected by "low IQ" voters, and he wants them to get smarter by eating more so they can vote for the right people.

More ›