pennomi

15 ms·

271.
by pennomi 3y ago
Exactly. People don’t like the DMCA at all. People would be happier in a world with very few IP restrictions at all. But businesses do like it, and profits are what drive these legal decisions. This will always be the case as long as mo
272.
by pennomi 3y ago
With that in mind, isn’t the legal burden on the model output rather than the model weights and training? An artist has the capability to reproduce something copyrighted, but that’s generally only a problem if they try to sell that repr
273.
by pennomi 3y ago
This was around a decade ago, but I remember having a use case where sending too much data to the Bluetooth stack on iPhone would crash the Bluetooth stack so hard that only a factory reset would fix it. I have no doubt that lingering vulne
274.
by pennomi 3y ago
Even if it is, we can fork and move on.
275.
by pennomi 3y ago
The current mid-sized model they’ve released for Gemini is pretty garbage, and fails all the tests I personally use to separate the smart LLMs from the stupid ones. I can run several local models faster and better.
276.
by pennomi 3y ago
I didn’t have time to watch yet, but did he take into consideration lunar crater telescopes? I always thought that would be an excellent reason to establish a lunar base.
277.
by pennomi 3y ago
They know this. It’s not a tool to prevent such AIs from being created, but instead a tool to protect businesses from publicly distributing an AI that could cause them market backlash, and therefore loss of profits. In the end it’s always a
278.
by pennomi 3y ago
It seems that as far as warfare goes, this is a downright polite munition to explode. That being the case, I don’t think it’ll see much more use.
279.
by pennomi 3y ago
Reminds me of something I heard: AIs will be convincing long before they are smart. Humans are wired to think that because a phrase is clever, that it must be true. For example, the Rhyme-as-reason Effect: https://en.m.wikipedia.