pegasus

9 ms·

121.
by pegasus 7mo ago
That's orthography, not semantics, but it's still part of the professional style steering the model on the "professional path" as GP put it.
122.
by pegasus 7mo ago
> Why would that be desirable? If we never try, we'll never know. I wouldn't be surprised if there is something to gain from a form of deterministic computation which is still integrated with the NN architecture. After all, too
123.
by pegasus 7mo ago
Sorry, but now you just sound straight-up pompous. Starting with that absurd first paragraph offering proof for the otherwise inconceivable idea that there are are indeed topics that you aren't qualified to comment on - on one hand, an
124.
by pegasus 7mo ago
I disagree. To my ears, "to help me find wording that conveys my thoughts the way I want them to be understood by the reader" conveys the same meaning as "to search for a way to formulate my thoughts like I intend them to be
125.
by pegasus 7mo ago
> The rewritten paragraph sounds written in the notorious "LLM voice". It's less direct, more pandering and removes injection points for further discussion. Does it? I don't see it. If anything, it is more direct and
126.
by pegasus 7mo ago
We do worry much more about animal well-being than we worry about our "lumps of metal" (as a cousin comment fittingly put it). As we should, and generally I think we should worry much more about animal welfare. I find concerns f
127.
by pegasus 7mo ago
Check out Code Bubbles: https://www.andrewbragdon.com/codebubbles_site.asp
128.
by pegasus 8mo ago
I would be very surprised if that would be the case. Maybe you mean deepfake content generated by organized crime or state actors, but that surely is a tiny fraction of what's being generated on Grok or other platforms.
129.
by pegasus 8mo ago
I imagine it would be the same for making (use of) models which don't add these watermarks, no? The punishable crime is providing or using the service.
130.
by pegasus 8mo ago
Long-form content from controlled providers is by far the lion's share of what needs this regulation, at least at the moment. Perfect is the enemy of good enough. Or at least of better than the status-quo.
131.
by pegasus 8mo ago
You generate it with that particular AI and look for the watermark :/
132.
by pegasus 8mo ago
Yeah, they also outlawed murder. And stealing. And bribing officials. All universally unenforceable. Weird...
133.
by pegasus 8mo ago
> Formulating theories is all nice and dandy, but it ain't science. Formulating theories ain't the whole of science, but it's a big part of it.
134.
by pegasus 8mo ago
It could be that they live in an area with more variable or more unpredictable weather than you. Or that they are much more outdoorsy. Or something else altogether. I'm surprised by your surprise. People live wildly different lifes a
135.
by pegasus 8mo ago
Aqua Voice does (at least some of) that as well.
136.
by pegasus 8mo ago
If you'd write the code yourself, you'd be much more likely to remember to handle those cases as well.
137.
by pegasus 8mo ago
Some very bright Jetbrains folks were able to solve most of those issues. Check out their MPS IDE [1], its structured/projectional editing experience is in a class of its own. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvCc0D
138.
by pegasus 8mo ago
They must be, I can't imagine they're all on Android. I'm on iOS and didn't know there was an issue with the keyboard. Maybe it's because I've not tried out any competing ones or maybe because I don't type
139.
by pegasus 8mo ago
Interesting, what were the instructions if you don't mind sharing?
140.
by pegasus 8mo ago
In case you're wondering why you're being downvoted: the history is much more nuanced. While the Archimedes Palimpsest is a genuine and tragic example of lost text, the broader claim that Christianity engendered a period of scient
141.
by pegasus 8mo ago
Mathematics is indeed one of those rare fields where intimate knowledge of human nature is not paramount. But even there, I don't expect LLMs to replace top-level researchers. The same evolutionary "baggage" which makes simul
142.
by pegasus 8mo ago
Sure, but at the risk of running into completely unforeseen and potentially catastrophic misunderstandings. We humans are wired to use human language to interact with other humans, who share our human experience, which AIs can only imperfec
143.
by pegasus 8mo ago
They are transient only in those rare domains that can be fully formalized/specified. Like chess. Anything that depends on the messy world of human - world interactions will require humans in the loop for translation and verification p
144.
by pegasus 8mo ago
But then he went on to spite the pope for no good reason, leading to all that trouble with the church.
145.
by pegasus 8mo ago
These two are not unrelated. It's just a step further along the same path.
146.
by pegasus 8mo ago
But could they do the same to goat herders with bigger guns, drones, bombs, etc?
147.
by pegasus 9mo ago
Actually, what you're listing above is just another set of beautiful (to you) abstractions. No, "banksters" are not "100% parasitical". The percent is definitely less than 100. But, you know, as they say: the devil
148.
by pegasus 9mo ago
Yet it won't be easy not to anthropomorphize it, expecting it to just know what we mean, as any human would. And most of the time it will, but once in a while it will betray its unthinking nature, taking the user by surprise.
149.
by pegasus 9mo ago
The same way you test any system - you find a sampling of test subjects, have them interact with the system and then evaluate those interactions. No system is guaranteed to never fail, it's all about degree of effectiveness and resilie
150.
by pegasus 9mo ago
Those of us who've ventured this far into the conversation would appreciate if you'd share your findings with us. Cheers!

More ›