Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pdimitar
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
You are reaching quite a bit, and misrepresenting too. But it's actually as simple as: Jarred's post was mature and didn't throw shade; Andrew's threw quite a bit of it while insisting it did not. I and many others don&#
62.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
To comment separately: lack of familiarity is true of course but do consider your bias -- familiarity should come quickly and easily. Long gone are my days where I wanted to wear badges of honor and suffer through difficult tooling, and I a
63.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Super curious then, and I stand corrected. You can put the `cargo clean gc` command on a daily/weekly schedule then, or configure the `gc` option in your Cargo config. Or set `CARGO_UNSTABLE_GC=true` in your shell init. Or all of the a
64.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
IMO from the info given in the OP it seems to me that they never actually needed Haskell, not playing to its strengths anyway, especially if they felt Python was an adequate replacement -- which it absolutely is not if you value the compile
65.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
I don't think it has almost anything to do with vibe-coding. When I tried Haskell and OCaml some 3 years ago, they were infuriating in terms of tooling and just needless friction (don't ask, forgot, but it was mostly around packag
66.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Using a frontier model you can combine it writing high-quality Rust and educate you in the process. You guys were too scared, needlessly. But as others said: if Haskell was not giving you too much in terms of excellent typing system then
67.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Wrong assumption. Not all AI usage leads to slop.
68.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
I know you're sarcastic but still: that is a win-win indeed.
69.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
You're exaggerating quite a lot. Biggest I've seen the cargo directory after 3 months of active Rust development was ~17GB. You can also limit it with an env var. I have capped mine at 10GB.
70.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
With respect, it's difficult to interpret "libertarian sensiblities" as something else than "political leanings". Now "liberal" is a much more general -- I wouldn't necessarily call that political --
71.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Of all the things I expected to read today on HN, "I chose a programming language that appeals to my political leanings" was certainly not one of them.
72.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Really depends on the concrete numbers and the projections. You could be right, I could be right, I am only saying what I've witnessed historically in general. Greed trumps a lot of other fairly rational courses of action.
73.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Yes: historically this is not what I have observed businesses doing. They'd fight tooth and nail to reduce expenses for the fatter profits; cost savings are seldom if ever passed to consumers.
74.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Realistic and historically accurate: Pepsi starts collecting the extra profits with zero price reductions.
75.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
At exactly 22:50 EEST (19:50 UTC) I got the notification email from Anthropic that the "Fable 5 was disabled" incident has been resolved. Sure enough, after restarting Claude Code, I could use it straight away.
76.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
~20:33 now and yeah, still no access.
77.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
It's 14:35 here in Eastern Europe and Fable is still not accessible for me, neither on the web UI nor inside Claude Code. Any exact times when we can expect it? The beginning of workday Pacific time, maybe?
78.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
> You could only use it for what like a week? How is that at all enough time to evaluate? By observing how in 4 workdays it achieved more than Opus in ~11 days. I am my team's backend lead and the Fable 5 model finally turned the
79.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
For the reasons stated above -- that DDR5-gen hardware is expensive right now -- I'd think the DDR4-gen market will remain alive for quite a big longer. Though that's likely much more on the second-hand market side of things. Whil
80.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
The mere "enthusiast" word in your question suggests the percent is not too big. But I am not sure I get your point -- elaborate, please?
81.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Dropping DDR-4 is anything but meaningful. It'll easily last 10 more years, machines from this gen are still much more affordable and quite powerful. In fact for most dev and gaming workflows the difference between the DDR-4 and DDR-5
82.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Indeed it's more like live-rewrite; features are still wanted but the rewrite heavily influences them as they go so it's juggling a lot of balls at the same time. Fable 5 was amazing at helping me with that. Opus 4.8 is... good, r
83.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Having the mechanism does not equal guaranteeing the positive result that this mechanism theoretically allows. Politicians' whole schtick is to promise the sun and the moon and then give their buddies the lucrative government contracts
84.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
I doubt they voted for increased fuel prices.
85.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
It's not that much of a tangent tbf. It's one of the things that is an endless churn in millions of codebases out there and yet no core programming language team has the courage and the grit to solve this problem. Those who tried
86.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Fair question, and I was vague just so as not to balloon the comment. I work in a financial startup. The codebase is a mess and very much spaghettified. One rework that forced us to migrate our data model from 1:1 users<->loans to M:N
87.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Okay, might have mistook 4 work days for 5.
88.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
> Does anyone think a startup with a good product is going to be materially disadvantaged by not having access to an incrementally better security focused LLM release? - It's not "incrementally better". It's a compl
89.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
Very good quote, thank you. And it seems like propaganda worked on these people.
90.
▲
by
pdimitar
3mo ago
A lot of "us" thought quite thoroughly and, you might say, even correctly, about "how to organize work at a fundamental level". News flash: the truly influential people that hold most of the capital on the planet don
More ›