pbear2k23

10 ms·

31.
Multithreaded AI Swatting(twitter.com)
1 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|0 comments
32.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
It's been 11 years and I've left the blackhat life behind - so whatever - I did it. Articles: https://uk.pcmag.com/opinion/110826/massive-phishing-attack-... https://www.adweek.com/perfor
33.
I phished the hell out of Tumblr in 2011(twitter.com)
1 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|1 comments
34.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
huh? i'm an irish-american from maine. it's boring here
35.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
tru still had to crack into a top ~300 website and shell it before wall clipping into archive.org's wp and shelling that too i'm of the opinion most everything has been shelled. indeed i was probably not the first nor will be the
36.
Archive.org was quietly hacked in 2012(twitter.com)
2 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|4 comments
37.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
at the very least - this is spectacular bait
38.
New Bitcoin Botnet Attack(twitter.com)
1 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|0 comments
39.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
they are
40.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
>Is there any way to detect if someone is doing this? hope so >Any idea if it'll work on ethereum? hope not this one might be bad
41.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
well - botnet operators don't care - and download is cheaper than upload
42.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
i found the "exploit" it's pretty frightening how simple/easy this is happy to answer questions and/or have this claim disproven
43.
How to disable the Bitcoin network with a botnet(twitter.com)
3 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|10 comments
44.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
Fast blockchains with sub-second block times actually fit. I agree that most implementations of blockchain are awful - but this just technically makes use of the nature of its immutability - and would showcase Ricardian contracts (600+ page
45.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
The official white house website is vulnerable to being DNS hijacked or shelled.
46.
Blockchain Based Anti-Deepfake Proposal(chat.openai.com)
1 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|11 comments
47.
Eliminating Deepfakes: A Multilayered Verification Solution(g.livejournal.com)
1 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|1 comments
48.
A simple, elegant solution to deepfakes(twitter.com)
1 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|0 comments
49.
FBI Declares War on the Community(twitter.com)
3 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|0 comments
50.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
some old articles about it: https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna31610125 https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/hackers-blam... https://www.billboard.com/music/music-
51.
Twitter Hack (2009)(twitter.com)
2 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|1 comments
52.
The Aim Hack of 2003(twitter.com)
3 points by pbear2k23 3y ago|0 comments
53.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
yes - that's why i never made the claim that the entire network was vulnerable to the attack. you are correct :thumbsup:
54.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
the conclusion of your argument is "this has absolutely no chance of making any dent in the network as a whole" which is faulty. much of the network is hosted by providers that charge for upstream overage: https://bitno
55.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
you seem to be mixing up that mining pools expose tcp/8333 and if one pool's full node is attacked - many miners are caught in the crossfire unless in some type of special firewalled whitelist.
56.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
>it's a minor issue with an impact that is greatly exaggerated or sensationalised by the person reporting it. until, again, a botnet makes huge swaths of the bitcoin network unprofitable. this is computer science - not how you feel
57.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
it's an issue. it shouldn't be possible to pull a range of 2000 block headers in an unthrottled way from a remote bitcoin node. while you make some valid points - i find it humorous that you have tasked yourself with defining what
58.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
that's actually not correct. apples and oranges. we're talking about mining rigs - not websites and apps maintained by sysadmins who can apply a simple fix or waf during an upstream overage attack. if this was a non-issue they wou
59.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
until a botnet makes mining unprofitable for huge swaths of the network - effectively turning the nodes offline
60.
by pbear2k23 3y ago
>This appears to be a description of a theoretical attack not theoretical https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/issues/3243 - i've attacked several of my own nodes. anyone could launch a botnet against

More ›