pbak

35 ms·

121.
by pbak 5y ago
What is OPM ? Office of Personnel Management ?
122.
by pbak 5y ago
Yes, mostly. The 12 Russians, and the 3 Russian companies all hired attorneys to represent them and counter sue for defamation. When their attorney went in front of the judge, all charges were dropped by the Justice Dept, refusing document
123.
by pbak 5y ago
Done
124.
by pbak 5y ago
I didn't suggest he was a pedophile. I know my syntax is not perfect, but still... Please re-read it. The false "witness" alleging Assange hacked, "Siggi the Hacker" was a pedophile, con-man and thief, not Assange.
125.
by pbak 5y ago
The point of the article is precisely that the hacking allegations against Assange were made up by Icelander "Siggi the Hacker", a sociopath, liar, con-man, pedophile. One of the crimes was stealing funds from wikileaks. The FBI k
126.
by pbak 5y ago
So, subtle insinuations settle the discussion ?
127.
by pbak 5y ago
You are most probably arguing against a troll paid by a PR agency.
128.
by pbak 5y ago
Fully got it now, thanks. edit: As I wrote you the above, and explored the subject further, this just dropped into pre-print, which might be of interest, as it seemingly gives a number to the risk difference : https://res.mdpi.co
129.
by pbak 5y ago
In regards to your first sentence : The text was long, you probably missed it. It do now preach moral relativism. I preach against civilizational value judgment relatively with one's own. As I wrote : I argue against making value judg
130.
by pbak 5y ago
You have fallen victim to and are repeating a propaganda lie. As documented by judicial procedure (Swedish equivalent to FOIA), the "stealthing" was a pure invention by the police. It was added days later _as ordered by email_ by
131.
by pbak 5y ago
Your answer shows that either I used the wrong method in conveying my message (maybe incompetent, quick and dirty application of the Socratic method), or, that my comment was actually on point. TLDR: Your make a lot of unfounded assumptions
132.
by pbak 5y ago
Who are you to decide of the superiority scale ? How would you even know if you are correctly setting it, even against what you think are your own standards ? What if your worldview is extremely warped, but you can't realize it, becaus
133.
by pbak 5y ago
I've got some vat grown meat to sell you.
134.
by pbak 5y ago
Thank you for your answer. I think I got it. I propose an anectode from personal experience, with an actual risk realized and my understanding in conclusion, to see if I got what you wrote clearly : It is advised not to drink at all before
135.
by pbak 5y ago
Alternative non-communist view : You change minimum wage. There's a 3-10y. period for prices signals, supply chains, and the structure of various credit markets to adjust across the economy. You begin to notice, as time goes, that nobo
136.
by pbak 5y ago
You have reversed the logical sequence. You can't know how efficient a vaccine is without a trial. You need an authorization first to do that. But you wouldn't get an authorization if something exists, even "only" 70% be
137.
by pbak 5y ago
As per the latest meta study of June 6, for over on whole year, 549 authors in 60 conclusive studies published on medRxiv, Nature, Wiley (basically the usual medical research forums) during the last year => free and shared, as you asked
138.
by pbak 5y ago
Have you read the headline ? They banned an interview with the inventor of mRNA vaccine tech for saying it might be dangerous and needs more caution and study.
139.
by pbak 5y ago
Nice "motte-and-bailey" argument. But a little transparent, no ?
140.
by pbak 5y ago
The interviewee's saying "Belgrade is not that insecure we don't need it", the police is saying "there's no facial rec", and the other guy responds "we don't know how the police uses it, who has
141.
by pbak 5y ago
I had a discussion on another social platform, in which we came to an hypothesis for that phenomenon : We now have two or three generations of very educated urban denizens which have lived in relatively efficient but very wealthy social mac
142.
by pbak 5y ago
I'm not certain I get how it is better. As far as I understand the mechanics of immunity, and what was recently published : - Natural immunity in this case means recognizing at a minimum the particular coronavirus of Covid. It also me
143.
by pbak 5y ago
No, nothing as pedestrian as Coke, nothing as exciting as a single secret group running the world. Maybe one or more worldwide conspiracies with a very banal kind of evil at their core :greed. Here's a scenario. Something like a bunch
144.
by pbak 5y ago
So they will not "prevent" the government, they will cajole and corrupt people in the legislative and executive branches so it doesn't get changed.
145.
by pbak 5y ago
I forgot to add /sarcasm
146.
by pbak 5y ago
Well, we _are_ living in democracies, aren't we ?
147.
by pbak 5y ago
Touché my friend, touché indeed. ;-)
148.
by pbak 5y ago
Thanks !
149.
by pbak 5y ago
The difference being that you can't "catch" being obese with a viral infection.
150.
by pbak 5y ago
If we are talking death, OK, but what about other issues in the "harm spectrum" in either the case of Covid or Vaccine ? I mean there's still stuff between "fully healthy" or "deadly dead".

More ›