paxys

24 ms·

661.
by paxys 8mo ago
You don't want to give the agent a raw key, so you give it a dummy one which will automatically be converted into the real key in the proxy. So how does that help exactly? The agent can still do exactly what it could have done if it ha
662.
by paxys 8mo ago
I read through the thing and don't quite understand what this adds that the dozens of LLM coding wrappers don't already do. You write a markdown spec. The script takes it and feeds it to an LLM API. The API generates code. Okay? W
663.
by paxys 8mo ago
Why will we need 1000 companies tomorrow to do the same thing that 100 companies are doing today? If they are really so efficient because of AI then won't 10 companies be able to solve the same problems?
664.
by paxys 8mo ago
One key line about ATMs is buried deep in the article: > the number of tellers per branch fell by more than a third between 1988 and 2004, but the number of urban bank branches (also encouraged by a wave of bank deregulation allowing mor
665.
by paxys 8mo ago
Atlassian also issues billions worth of RSUs to employees every year. The buybacks are necessary to offset that. Shareholders are getting nothing out of it, and the fact that the stock price has been in freefall for years despite the buybac
666.
by paxys 8mo ago
Atlassian has 16,000 employees worldwide and reported a net loss of $257 million last year. In fact it has not had a single profitable year since its IPO in 2015. And as expected its stock price is in the dumpster, down to $75 from its pe
667.
by paxys 8mo ago
A lot of problems (I’d say the majority in tech) can be solved faster and better by 100 people than 1600.
668.
by paxys 8mo ago
TL;DR - Perplexity-branded OpenClaw
669.
by paxys 8mo ago
Which side are you implying AWS is on?
670.
by paxys 8mo ago
Whatever happened to Preplexity? They were all the rage a year or two ago, and now I hear...nothing. Is the product still being used? Making money? Or just overtaken by the base LLMs it was relying on?
671.
by paxys 8mo ago
Software engineering as a profession isn’t going anywhere, but what makes AI different from previous fads is that engineers who fail to adapt and update their skills will definitely be replaced.
672.
by paxys 8mo ago
This reads like a fanfic. "My manager wants to get rid of me because I'm too good with computers and he is jealous." No, he wants to get rid of you because you are an operating expense for the company. If they can achieve t
673.
by paxys 8mo ago
RIP Wave
674.
by paxys 8mo ago
That’s what they are doing. This is a textbook protection racket. “Buy Cloudflare bot protection, otherwise it would be a shame if your site got scraped and ddos’d.” Who is doing the scraping and ddosing? Cloudflare.
675.
by paxys 8mo ago
"Musk says he'll fix the corrupt Democrat-run government and reduce two trillion in spending and given his track record I have no reason not to believe him." Real quote from a friend when this whole thing was going down.
676.
by paxys 8mo ago
> named after the first professional woman hired by the firm in 1945 Going out of their way to find a woman's name for an AI assistant and bragging about it is not as empowering as the creators probably thought in their heads.
677.
by paxys 8mo ago
Less than pocket change. The money is irrelevant but it does show that Zuck is all out of ideas and desperate to keep up in the AI race.
678.
by paxys 8mo ago
I remember back when everyone thought Meta was ten steps ahead of the rest of the AI industry and Llama would dominate the field and put OpenAI and Anthropic out of business. Nope, turns out it is just a bunch of out of touch execs throwing
679.
by paxys 8mo ago
That number 2 is Alexandr Wang, who most definitely initiated this acquisition (after being rejected by the OpenClaw guy).
680.
by paxys 8mo ago
Someone should teach the decision makers how pipelines work. If AI-created diffs are being churned out at 10x the previous rate but manual reviews are the bottleneck then the overall system is producing at the exact same rate as before. The
681.
by paxys 8mo ago
If someone was confident enough to push through an AI change without even reading/reviewing it themselves adding more buttons to the UI isn't going to change anything.
682.
by paxys 8mo ago
Why can't you do just that? You can configure file path permissions in Claude or via an external tool.
683.
by paxys 8mo ago
I feel like I'm the only one not getting the world models hype. We've been talking about them for decades now, and all of it is still theoretical. Meanwhile LLMs and text foundation models showed up, proved to be insanely effect
684.
by paxys 8mo ago
Striking public infrastructure is the oldest kind of war there is. The article does raise an important question though - would an AWS data center be considered a civilian target or military?
685.
by paxys 8mo ago
> The tech industry often talks about “the cloud” as though it were something abstract and untouchable. But the cloud runs on data centers, those data centers have an address, and that address can be hit by a drone. Nominating this as th
686.
by paxys 8mo ago
> The missing part is that current gpus are already money making machine in 2026 Are they? Unless you are Nvidia that is very far from the case. OpenAI's current revenue is $25 billion a year. They are expected to spend $600 billion
687.
by paxys 8mo ago
Until there is a capable open source open weight AI that is easily hostable by an average person - no, we still have a long way to go. You aren't going to have software freedom when the tool that enables it is controlled by a handful o
688.
by paxys 8mo ago
The act of training by itself has been ruled to be fair use over and over again, including for LLMs, and there isn't much debate left there. The test for infringement is if the output is transformative enough, and that is what NYT vs
689.
by paxys 8mo ago
The formula is what is patented, not the process to come up with it.
690.
by paxys 8mo ago
You've just described why every SaaS stock has taken a beating in the last 6 months.

More ›