paxys

4 ms·

31.
by paxys 1mo ago
The accusation brings up an interesting point. If I publish something, and disclose that I used AI for assistance, do I have to credit everyone who previously used the same AI to try the same problem? Because their prompts inevitably made i
32.
by paxys 1mo ago
I read through those tweets, and can’t see the bullying everyone is referring to. Mind elaborating?
33.
by paxys 1mo ago
So someone can make public accusations of theft against you and if you publicly reply denying it you’re the bully?
34.
by paxys 1mo ago
This is how internet discourse works on Reddit/Twitter/HN and the rest. Someone said something which confirms your biases so it’ll now be treated as a fact and repeated endlessly in the echo chamber.
35.
by paxys 1mo ago
People should realize by now that they aren't giving out thousands of dollars worth of compute in a $20 subscription out of the goodness of their hearts. The base level plans aren't meant for any kind of serious work beyond the eq
36.
by paxys 1mo ago
Software engineers have been trying to put themselves out of a job ever since the profession first came into being. Whenever an engineer gets a task their very first thought is "how can I automate this?" Going by mainstream consen
37.
by paxys 1mo ago
I don't understand what you are trying to say. Do you believe AI is not an arms race?
38.
by paxys 1mo ago
These researchers are paid millions of dollars for their work. I doubt trust is really an issue at that level.
39.
by paxys 1mo ago
Plus you can offload a lot of work to a cheaper model
40.
by paxys 1mo ago
There are plenty of people out there who find vulnerabilities and sell them to the highest bidder. Anyone is welcome to do it, including the researchers and hackers reporting them responsibly. There's no need to try and make a convolut
41.
by paxys 1mo ago
That's a pretty genius internal incentive to move fast.
42.
by paxys 1mo ago
Let the man run a porn seedbox in peace
43.
by paxys 1mo ago
That's a lot of ifs. Equally likely that the guy was just running a seedbox.
44.
by paxys 1mo ago
Nah they should have released it in a 14-part tweet instead.
45.
by paxys 1mo ago
OpenAI does not
46.
by paxys 1mo ago
OpenAI was rushing and making last minute changes for a big product launch. Easy to mess something up in that situation. The outage lasted like 20 minutes. Anthropic is down a lot regardless, and in this case only specific models were affec
47.
by paxys 1mo ago
Why are people surprised? Trump promoted his personal lawyer to Attorney General. This is how the administration works.
48.
by paxys 1mo ago
Cool try explaining any of these terms to the average sysadmin. Email security is hopelessly broken, and the best you can do is try to limit exposure. Removing Gmail as an attack vector is one of those decisions.
49.
by paxys 1mo ago
Because ownership can change. I can still use Gmail to send email from my old university address that I lost access to 15+ years ago. This should not be possible.
50.
by paxys 1mo ago
I'm really curious to see two or more swarms of agents from different models/providers interact with each other. So far we've seen perfect cooperation because they have the same training process, thoughts, goals, and so it&#x
51.
by paxys 1mo ago
Remember that LLMs are still computer programs, and so are inherently deterministic. A model given the same input multiple times will always produce the same output. The randomness is added on top. This is why LLM-produced text, websites, i
52.
by paxys 1mo ago
All these problems can be fixed by a "pretend to be an average human to pass a turing test" prompt
53.
by paxys 1mo ago
Because it looks good in a marketing video
54.
by paxys 1mo ago
Downloading and installing an app from a source other than the official store included with the OS. Because that is a mouthful people named it "sideloading".
55.
by paxys 1mo ago
Hosted on Azure is different from provided by Azure. The former just uses Azure as an infra provider. The latter is a managed offering that is operated and billed by Microsoft using tech licensed from OpenAI.
56.
by paxys 1mo ago
If the motive is satisfaction/enjoyment then it shouldn't matter what an AI is capable of. You should be happy with your own creation. If the motive is profit then you should be adopting AI just like you have adopted any other ski
57.
by paxys 1mo ago
Why does it matter if others are "cheating" or not? Your own creation isn't affected by it.
58.
by paxys 1mo ago
I don't know if they have formally attempted this test in the last couple years, but I'm pretty sure any mainstream LLM will be able to crack it with ease.
59.
by paxys 1mo ago
Is there a point in playing Chess or Go when you know there's a computer out there that can beat you (and everyone else)?
60.
by paxys 1mo ago
Why are you making the assumption that a person's time is worthless? I'd argue that it is the single most valuable resource we all have.

More ›