pauldix

27 ms·

241.
by pauldix 10y ago
We're happy to take PRs. Seems everyone has opinions on packaging and you know what it's like when everyone has opinions, right? :)
242.
by pauldix 10y ago
We'll be doing comparisons against Kairos and OpenTSDB in the coming months. We just get asked about Cassandra specifically quite a bit.
243.
InfluxDB 1.0 GA Released: A Retrospective and What’s Next(influxdata.com)
136 points by pauldix 10y ago|79 comments
244.
by pauldix 10y ago
The tests were run on the same hardware, a single server. Bare metal, not VMs. InfluxDB writes the series string with everything. We tried to imitate what you'd need to do to get close to similar functionality doing time series like I
245.
by pauldix 10y ago
We're working on solving the high cardinality problem. Hopefully soon
246.
by pauldix 10y ago
Yep, community colleges are where it's at. I started at a small local college a half-step up from a community college as it offered 4 year degrees. Got a year's worth of credits there to establish a good record and then transferre
247.
Implementing a Serverless AWS IoT Back End with AWS Lambda and Amazon DynamoDB(aws.amazon.com)
3 points by pauldix 10y ago|0 comments
248.
by pauldix 10y ago
That's the plan. No breaking API changes for a long time. We'll have additive stuff in the 1.x point releases. Tentative plan is to cut 1.1 two months after 1.0 with patch releases in the interim for any necessary bug fixes.
249.
by pauldix 10y ago
1. No reason really, we should probably update. 2. We do have repos, just noticed that they're not listed on the downloads page. See this page for details: http://docs.influxdata.com/influxdb/v0.13/introductio
250.
by pauldix 10y ago
Congrats Daniel and team! Awesome work!
251.
by pauldix 10y ago
After 1.0 is released our two highest priorities are to handle high cardinality data sets (on disk and in memory inverted index) and continuous queries that are more automatic (downsample everything and give users the option for query resul
252.
InfluxDB Clustering Beta and Data Explorer(influxdata.com)
64 points by pauldix 10y ago|18 comments
253.
InfluxDB v1.0.0 Beta 1 is released(influxdata.com)
4 points by pauldix 10y ago|0 comments
254.
InfluxDB Markedly Outperforms Elasticsearch in Time Series Data Benchmark(influxdata.com)
10 points by pauldix 10y ago|0 comments
255.
by pauldix 10y ago
InfluxDB CTO here, thanks for the note! We've definitely had significant improvements even over the last two months. And the breaking API changes will be a thing of the past very soon: https://github.com/influxdata&#x2F
256.
InfluxCloud: Managed InfluxDB Clusters and Grafana on AWS(influxdata.com)
19 points by pauldix 10y ago|2 comments
257.
by pauldix 11y ago
First, that bug is closed. Second, the last comment has nothing to do with TSM. Just because a user thinks it's related to the storage engine and posts that, doesn't mean that's what is actually happening. For that particular
258.
by pauldix 11y ago
I'm not aware of unresolved bugs on TSM1. We have people running it at significant scale in production. You're on 0.10? It's not rhetoric. I know people using it so it seems to me you're trying to spread FUD. There are s
259.
by pauldix 11y ago
The free HA option will be based on this repo here: https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb-relay That will be released and documented with 0.12, which should be in April. What I meant by basic was that it would be a hi
260.
by pauldix 11y ago
And the basic double write HA architecture doesn't work in the short term? It's free and we'll have the code out and OSS with the 0.12 release. And when it comes time to scale out you still won't be able to afford the co
261.
by pauldix 11y ago
I doubt you're an actual InfluxDB user, but I'll bite. If thousands of people are using a free standalone server, is that a bad thing? If VCs subsidized the development of this free software, is that also a bad thing? Software doe
262.
by pauldix 11y ago
Is it useful to you now without clustering?
263.
by pauldix 11y ago
I'm sorry that you feel tricked. I hope that one of the open source options handles your use case if commercial software doesn't work for you. However, we think that the community will be better off if we can continue to contribut
264.
by pauldix 11y ago
Thanks, we do feel that this will lead to a better overall InfluxDB in both standalone and clustered. The current version is siginficantly better than 0.9 and it's only getting better
265.
by pauldix 11y ago
It will be available in the cloud service in the next few months. But if you want to continue running single server that's ok too
266.
by pauldix 11y ago
The reason we think InfluxDB is compelling as a standalone server is that you can get 300k metrics/sec on a single server. The scale is there for many use cases in the current release
267.
by pauldix 11y ago
I'm sorry for the disappointment and understand your frustration. Our hope is that for users for whom a commercial solution isn't an option, there will be open source methods to do what they need. The HA page with open source opti
268.
by pauldix 11y ago
We're committed to making the clustering a world class product. You're right, it'll take time. However, we'll get there. We'll put the same focused effort and testing into it over the coming months and years that we
269.
by pauldix 11y ago
The new query engine work should get merged into master early next week. You'll be able to test against a nightly build then to see what kind of performance improvement will be part of 0.11. What kinds of queries are you seeing poor pe
270.
by pauldix 11y ago
Not yet, but it's on our TODO list. However, we have to finish the clustering implementation before we bother going through that testing. At this point we're telling people it's experimental and not meant for production use.

More ›