Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pas
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
47 ms
·
901.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
difficult seems like the right word. it's definitely not a walk in the park to run a brutal dictatorship like North Korea.
902.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
Yes, but the game matrix is not that simple. There's a whole gamut of possible actions between defect and sleep with Elon. Cross-posting to a Mastodon account is not that hard. I look at this from two viewpoints. One is that it's
903.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
So you're saying Head of AI of Google of Jeff can't choose a better venue? He's not the first Jeffery with a lot of power who doesn't care.
904.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
Hm, interesting! Then probably lots of "bandwidth conscious" folks pounced on on their fancy new PoP. Whatever the reason, rather strange to do this without even a few days of notice.
905.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
... but still, they have just about as much chance as the other guys, no? Competition is a given usually anyway. Maybe even in the same batch having very similar companies makes sense -- see the recent rush of YC funded companies that build
906.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
Are they going to use some kind of video verification (which is just some AI/ML guessing the age based on the video?) and usual signals (ie. if the user likes too many stuff that kids like they will be flagged, and their account suspen
907.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
That but also privacy too. The damage is real, yes, but the negative effect on privacy will also be. (And the Aus gov is extremely far from any kind of principled actor in this to trust them with this experiment. Though I'm very curiou
908.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
So what's the most likely outcome here? Savvy 15 year olds "buying" accounts of older people? IRC and email making a comeback?
909.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
Sorry, what's the implication here, what is the disgrace? Why parental controls are bad? (Or what was implied was a /s tag? :))
910.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
of course there's no perfectly privacy preserving solution for this, but ... zero-knowledge proofs have come a pretty long way. if I understand correctly it's possible to give 16+ people tokens and then they can make the signups (
911.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
in person? sure, that's harder, but we're talking about online services, right? many times verification is simply uploading a photo, GenAI can make a nice fake ID. are these id verification sites linked to government databases? fo
912.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
They recently entered the US market, so almost surely there was some honeymoon period (ie. investment to gain market share), but likely there's a significant difference between how the IXP/bandwidth/peering market works in th
913.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
Good for you, my bash on balls was unfortunately not able to solve service based meshtainer architecture :( I remember how kernel module params for ALG/bonding/teaming had to be figured out for each fancy NIC/driver, it was f
914.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
how does it work? how many nodes? what do you use for consensus, request routing, etc...?
915.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
seems very logical considering the last centuries. nation state needs military, military needs people to STFU and do what needs to be done. and unfair, considering that rich people always found ways to dodge the draft or serve in armchair p
916.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
postgresql operators are pretty nice, so it makes sense to run stateful stuff on k8s (ie. for CI, testing, staging, dev, etc.. and probably even for prod if there's a need to orchestrate shards) > exec kubectl exec is good, and it&#
917.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
My problem is the brittleness. Sure, I am playing with fire (k3s, bare metal, cilium, direct assigned IP to Ingresses), but a few weeks ago on one cluster suddenly something stopped working in the external IP -> internal cluster IP netwo
918.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
this was simply a targeted operation at people who use cash instead of credit cards, right? (I mean business trips, corporate people usually use credit cards.)
919.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
Doing anything in the EU is hard, and since CABM is not even live yet it was unnecessarily extra-hard. And then it seems they were completely incompetent. (Custom middling quality machines ordered from Asia, they then weren't able to s
920.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
The implicit argument is that there's some irreducible non-negotiable project complexity in real-world software, and the explicit argument in the post is that you can either put it into the language/compiler or keep it in wetware.
921.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
Because a startup scene needs a fucking scene. Having exactly one darling company in each sector is recipe for the classic yet seemingly every time unavoidable "too precious to fail" failure mode. It's the same thing that al
922.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
fiscal multiplier != trickle down
923.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
> what makes someone go such a great length to bash ... """ Inherent complexity does not go away if you close your eyes. When you choose not to care about complexity, you're merely pushing it onto other developers in
924.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
... what do you mean it cannot be cached? isn't it a tree of cache servers? as origin sends the frames they're cached. and as load grows the tree has to grow too, and when it cannot resorting to degrading bitrate, and ultimately t
925.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
it's not that simple """ Intuitively, an overparameterized model will generalize well if the model’s representations capture the essential information necessary for the best model in the model class to perform well "
926.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
can you expand on that? which parts are ok, which are bad? and more importantly is it possible to do better with the available resources available to a "regular" researcher? is there even some hard data on ghost job openings? (ie.
927.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
the naive keyword search shows 1.6%, the GPT-then-BERT shows 21%, there's a 50% estimate from the literature confounders abound, of course, but the proposed mechanism and other aspects all make sense
928.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
I appreciated the answer by manquer. HN is tech-focused but not tech-only, right?
929.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
well, it is work. quite a lot! when you feel you want to "write more online" what do you want? why do you want to write online? do you want to participate in some discourse? understand a topic, do a deep dive? communicate somethin
930.
▲
by
pas
2y ago
Hm, so the point of adding this additional hop (which is also a JSON under the .well-known/ prefix), is that I can always put the domain of my homepage into WebFinger aware OIDC login boxes, no need to remember the domain of my OIDC pr
More ›