Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pas
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
271.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
> JQuery already had a feature that rendered the shadow DOM unnecessary, but it would require discipline that most developers did not have nor understand. Could you explain this please?
272.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
> make money vs more people it's the same thing for them they really want more engaged active (addicted) eyeballs, the more friction they can remove the easier it is to make this happen
273.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
if your neighborhood gets denser you will see the benefits if you want to live there you can pick from more options developers capture value, but the buildings are there obviously the usual problem is that the land value goes up, and thus t
274.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
... yet still tens of millions of eligible voters don't even bother the country is very low-density, there's no one obvious point to protest (there was Occupy Wall Street... and then the Seattle TAZ and .... that's it, oh and
275.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
yes and no, as the sibling comment mentions sometimes a message bus is used (Kafka, for example), but Netflix is (was?) all-in with HTTP (low-latency gRPC, HTTP/3, wrapped in nice type-safe SDK packages) but ideally you don't brea
276.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
...well, that's good for scaling the queue, but this means the worker needs to load all relevant state/context from some DB (which might be sped up with a cache, but then things are getting really complex) ideally you pass the con
277.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
you are not the target audience whatever runs on typical investor/C-suite laptops and phones (so new iPhone/MacBook with "stock" Safari, maybe in corporate some cursed Windows setup with Chrome) is okay, and obviously th
278.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
the dealerships did not want them, this already made it unlikely to succeed (towing range mania was the other thing)
279.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
... too bad there's no precedent for some part of an island around there uniting with this fancy free trade group of maverick countries!
280.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
Yep. If the EU wants to direct money to this "problem" then they need to mandate that companies have a "domestic" fallback vendor.
281.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
50K EUR is OK to start. There's no point in trying to outspend the top private firms. Like many other people said there are already thousands of unpaid volunteers doing quality work. If the EU wants "domestic" stuff they need
282.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
> You can have sandboxing and system integrity while still giving the user overrides. How? What kind of overrides? You mean that Safetynet could still report attestations? I have no idea how it works, but doesn't it require a chain
283.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
that might be overdoing it. I don't know where is the current case law, but IMHO storing a random number and identifying the retuning user is not PII (to count how many times that user returned). now of course if it gets joined with ot
284.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
Let's see what happens if they get sucked into supporting the new regime. Amazing prospects already!
285.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
Just a few weeks ago I ordered something from JBL US and somehow on the UPS sticker an "Á" became a caret "^" shrug Most of the world is a circus.
286.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
if you are a US citizen you can have US bank account HSBC UK also is available (and the account can be opened from the US remotely) in the EU there's Santander (OpenBank), and Wise, Revolut debanking is IMHO when simply being too poor
287.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
yes, but that's not de-banking. it's banking being shitty. (it's the same problem as healthcare and construction, a shitton of regulation, some competition, but no real big differences, and a lot of global dependencies [from
288.
▲
by
pas
9mo ago
The usual answer is that there are other people who also need things and cannot pay, so then how should the provider pick between them fairly? (And likely some have a "free clinic", and as you mentioned there are options.) Still a
289.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
what exactly they are doing if they don't look at the acquisitions of the biggest company?
290.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
Of course there's no free lunch, but economic equilibrium includes future obligations too (at a discounted rate), it includes the value of current unfinished things, there's a lot of real economic value backed by demand, because o
291.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
it sounds like there's some kind of coupling, inductive or optoelectronic but yes, I also want the juicy details! so this is the clock https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NIST-F1 or this https://en.wikipedia.
292.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
Money supply management is important for price stability. There's no debt problem in fractional reserve banking. (Exactly because debt is slowly inflated away while real assets keep their value [as their nominal value increases].) Ther
293.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
Sure, but now there's a deadweight loss by allocation inefficiencies (plus the disemployment effects are strongest at the margin, so now many people are working less than they want to, because they cannot sell more of their work for le
294.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
It's extremely lazy "writing". Seems absolutely unnecessary, forced, immeasurably trite, off-puttingly boring, overused, so brazenly cliché that there has to be some kind of counter-intuitive selection going on, like with the
295.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
Still more value than the headline/article!
296.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
Yep, all 4 charges remained in the superseding indictment (filed Aug 27 in 2024 by Smith). One of the problem is the "the DOJ's policy of not prosecuting sitting Presidents", while it's understandable it's definitel
297.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
does it offer easy ways for writing the hot-path in Rust? if yes it might be useful even if the non-optimized requests are a bit slower.
298.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
did people ask the supervisors of the foundation what do they think about this?
299.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
multiple things can be true at once. is that too much money for one person? well, apparently it depends on who do you ask. and even if the board members who approved it might thought it's too much, it still could have been cheaper than
300.
▲
by
pas
10mo ago
it's a completely obvious "problem" -- more users are easier to monetize, even if they "simply" go the Wikipedia donations model many people stated that they are happy to do targeted donations (ie. money earmarked s
More ›