Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
parliament32
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Why would you expect "future growth" from something that's literally making negative dollars? If you take a step back it makes zero sense.
32.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Because they're doing the fancy equivalent of selling $20 bills for $15 and chirping about how high their revenue is. You, me, and everyone else could generate $inf revenue with that strategy, but that doesn't make it a viable bus
33.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Interestingly, these are the exact rules they're working to overturn: currently, no matter how many stupid accounting tricks you pull off, you need to actually be profitable to be included in the S&P 500.
34.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
If the business process is fully AI-able, why wouldn't it just be implemented by the next AI in line? I'd argue the only companies to survive will be the ones with either a human input or a human output. Everything else is effec
35.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
I miss when my DoorDash was still subsidized.
36.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Is it qualified at all? Or can you measure anything and multiply it through to get whatever number you want at the end? Along the lines of "in the 4.75 hours starting at 02:35 yesterday we collected invoices worth $X so our run-rate re
37.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
I suspect MS threatened them with a SmartScreen blackhole for the domain, I'm not surprised they pulled it.
38.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
LLMs don't have the capability to say they don't know, because they don't know what they know. They are, after all, just next-token-predictors. I just tried both queries with their same query format, just adding an "I Do
39.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Cherry-picking is fun but most of them are real, verifiable facts that the models get... straight up wrong. > 3c24b5fe "Debian Security Advisory DSA-180-1 describes a buffer overflow vulnerability involving Cyrus SASL usernames.&quo
40.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
I wish HN would do the same for submissions.
41.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Is it really any different than Google wants advertisers on YT, but still labels ads as ads?
42.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Imagine working for an organization where 1) cybersecurity is actually the #1 priority, ahead of "shareholder value" and all the other gobblygook, 2) you get to design systems where you actually have to assume that every other ent
43.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Ultimately, you have to store the file somewhere and sync it to all the places you want it. The magic here is that it decouples the "password manager" and the "file syncer" so you can (and should) use whatever you'r
44.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
I've never seen this happen, because (as far as I can tell) all KeePassXC clients auto-save the file any time a change is made, and all the Nextcloud clients auto-sync as soon as the file changes. Keepass is also resilient to the under
45.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
KeePassXC has always been the one true path.
46.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
My KeePassXC database auto-syncs to my Nextcloud instance. Nextcloud client on PCs, Keepass2Android on my phone, and it's the same end result as Bitwarden but without the shenanigans.
47.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
[flagged]
48.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
I appreciate these comments, because they're a warning. If I'm on the fence about whether a link is worth a click-through or not, I'll have a peek at the comments first, and when I see something like this I don't bother
49.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Has your AWS bill gone down in the last decade? Despite "efficiency" and chip improvements? Why would you expect text-generator-as-a-service to be any different?
50.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
And passwords. Shared secrets in general are a bad idea. If you're copy/pasting strings around to be used for authentication, you've done something wrong. Workload identities and passwordless auth are the one true path.
51.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
If tokens weren't being sold at a loss, Anthropic would be screaming about it from the rooftops. They've been desparately trying to make themselves not look like a money furnace lately, but it's not really working. They might
52.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
I'm very much enjoying how Anthropic is basically an anti-advertisement of how things will go if you try to run a company with text generators. The univerally-despised customer support, constant outages, hilarious bugs in CC, and now h
53.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Gaming might be unique in the sense that it's the only industry where 1) consumers make a one-time purchase of a product, but then 2) the manufacturer remains responsible for the online component.. forever? I can't think of any ot
54.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
> oven-sh locked as off topic and limited conversation to collaborators Strong deja-vu about that time Cursor tried to slop together a browser and tried to bury dissent when people pointed out how hilariously terrible the whole thing was
55.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
> It works 99% of the time I would add the caveat "...as long as you have no competition." If you're in a market where alternatives exist, and they have the certification, you're definitely transparently losing sales.
56.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Little doubt the true motivation behind this is the advertising angle. What better way to advertise to consumers than seeing exactly what they're spending money on, historically and in near-realtime?
57.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
So you slop-coded a tool, you're slop-generating reports, you know it has hallucinations ("false positives").. and you're complaining it's too much work to even verify the output? And you're surprised OSS proje
58.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
They would have to prove the modification caused the accident.
59.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Counterpoints: 1) My auto insurance is already too expensive. I have zero interest in "oh yeah we had to add to your driver factor because telematics says you exceeded the speed limit 11 times last year :^)". Less tracking is just
60.
▲
by
parliament32
5mo ago
Good article. But it concludes with "Open models may be only 4–5 months behind on coding-heavy, benchmark-visible tasks... the gap is likely much larger and closer to 8 months." So, fine. In 2024, being 8 months behind was massive
More ›