Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
parineum
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
361.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
What I said there was confusing. I was saying that _I_ was fine with an over-tired person being charged with a DUI as I feel it's just as dangerous and just as elective. It is not the law here. That was unclear, sorry. The relevant sec
362.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> Police in the US simply need to be equipped with roadside chemical tests for substances. They exist, they just simply don't use them. I feel like you're not getting my point. > Doesn't that sound like a better solutio
363.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
Theft is a criminal offense as well. The officer can be prosecuted for that. Qualified immunity also applies to the officer who individually. The department can be sued still.
364.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
They'll have an opportunity to prove that in court. I know that's not a great solution (because of the penalties involved in simply being accused of a crime, but that's a different issue) but, remember, they were pulled over
365.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> They have breathalyzers and blood tests. Field sobriety tests are not there to help police arrest drunk drivers, they're there to help police arrest whomever they want to. You're wrong about that. "Sobriety" isn
366.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
Just like "Stand Your Ground" and "Castle Doctrine", people learned a new legal buzzword and think it applies to every story in the news.
367.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
That's a funny thing because, as with all absolutes, it's trivially easy to prove it wrong. All you need is _one_ cop to not be a bastard to prove it wrong. I've known several non-bastard cops.
368.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> 2) the poor stage successful revolutions so they gain access to the means of production and everyone becomes equal Or a handful of the poor become the new rich, which is usually what happens in that scenario.
369.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> Chrome and Search which are both monopolies I'm on Firefox and use DuckDuckGo.
370.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
the first one wasn't a flop. They got sued (abd lost) for patent violation and hsd to stop making it.
371.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
They could easily do both. They could sell the first few for more and settle down to their normal price after a time. There isn't sustainable demand for a $300 steam controller, that's why they didn't price it there, not beca
372.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> I don't know if "anti-natalist" can be so simply placed on the conservative vs. progressive axis. That was kind of my point. I doesn't belong on that axis at all, especially trying to transpose a comment from decade
373.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
>> In 2002, Turner accused Israel of terror That's a funny thing to mark as "progressive" as I don't think that'd have been considered progressive until fairly recently. Plus, he walked it back. > In 2002,
374.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
Frankly, I think it's much less of an issue than it's made out to be. If money meant so much, Donald Trump wouldn't have beat Jeb Bush on the way to beating Hilary Clinton. To me, money in politics is the red herring to keep
375.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
"Full" in full self-driving is a superfluous modifier. But it does is further emphasize that, what a person would consider "self-driving", it can do. Except it can't, of course.
376.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> We need to overturn CU Or we could stop looking at SCOTUS to fix legislation and ask the branch of government who's job it is to fix legislation, Congress.
377.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
Theft and robbery are not just monetary crimes, that's why the penalties are different. Theft almost always has a component of violence done or threatened against a person and robbery involves violating a persons formerly thought-to-be
378.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
Hopefully we can regulate them like California electricity and let one airline be active per airport and let them charge more than triple national rates.
379.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
Your not addressing the dispute. A fever is 38c, great. What the parents said was that you may have misheard because a fever isn't serious until 104. Which is line's up with the language you used. > and they said it's not
380.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
They basically revolutionized the web with the JavaScript V8 engine in chrome. Before them, JavaScript performance was so bad you had to have a really light touch with it.
381.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> Greedy people put the desire for more money above the welfare of the business In my experience, it's much simpler. People are greedy if they make things I want cost more.
382.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> It's largely a vanity ouroboros where someone with more money than sense generates a song, pays bots to get fraudulent streams, and uses those streams to generate vanity metrics. It's actually money laundering. I generate ai
383.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
I'm not a lawyer or anything but the third party doctrine holds because you're willingly and knowingly giving your information to said third party. I expect that the difference there is that the contents of a storage locker or saf
384.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
This is pretty straightforward actually. The third party doctrine [1] has been extrapolated to the digital age to the massive detriment of privacy. All it takes is for Congress to pass a law clarifying to the courts that the third party doc
385.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> If nuclear is so safe, how come nobody is willing to insure it? Almost every plant is bespoke, leading each plant to have unknown failure modes and rates. Additionally, insurance works by pooling risk amongst a large group of individua
386.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
Graphene is available to everyone.
387.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> But beyond whether the OS is good or not, "fuck you, I've got mine"... What about, "I got mine and you can have it to." Nobody is preventing access to graphene.
388.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
How do you pronounce gift?
389.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
https://xkcd.com/605/
390.
▲
by
parineum
6mo ago
> as a farmer you cannot afford not to use them. Yes, because it's a good product. Farmer's can't afford not to use tractors or artificial irrigation either. It's not sinister to develop a product that is better than
More ›