Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pardon_me
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
pardon_me
8mo ago
AIs that were trained on data obtained through naughty channels actively avoid citing sources and full passages of reference text, otherwise they'd give the game away. This seems to increase the chance of them entirely hallucinating so
32.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
It turned out the revolution was always being televised, only it was us thinking what we saw was a reflection of society, not that it was being delivered to us disguised as our own ideas.
33.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
Following your logic (which is from the company marketing), why not remove GPS on the car in case they go wrong, as humans we don't need GPS? Cameras could go wrong too... then what happens? Humans hear car/road noises, along with
34.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
How do we know everyone's better for it? Massive amounts of public and private funding went into it and we still haven't seen the outcome, it's too soon. Consider how many car manufacturers are backtracking, the fact that Chi
35.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
Lapse in focus is such a great point. If we looked at the number of accidents caused by very human errors such as "lapse in focus" and "sudden medical events" etc. which we would 100% expect to go away when offloading ta
36.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
If rider and pedestrian safety is the main concern, the automated assistance and safety systems that car manufacturers were already developing make the most sense. They either warn or intervene in situations the human may not realize they a
37.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
I used to be an adventurer like you, then I took a roundhouse kick to the head. Never let your humanoid robot watch TV!
38.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
The company should be responsible for providing options to block all or part of the content, and warn users of the content type, depending on their place in the pipeline. For example, Apple and Google should provide tools for the parents to
39.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
Remember this when considering seeking medical help for an embarrassing symptom.
40.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
So you set something up to weasel your way into other "families" friendships by doing a specific thing and then judging their response/non-response? Like A/B testing humans. Perhaps some people can sense this stuff subco
41.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
What planet are you on? $60/head for a simple party with middle shelf drinks and basic food is necessary "anywhere" for passing acquaintances?
42.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
Face-time. Their knowledge, training, and ability to write letters. Just because it's expensive, doesn't mean they are spending their evenings researching possible patient conditions and expanding their knowledge. Some might, but
43.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
Nothing he stated suggests this. Not giving a nod to how difficult it is doesn't mean people don't care. Unfortunately it is still true, we all have to advocate for our own care and pay attention to ourselves. The fact that this n
44.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
It's called OPEN AI and started as a charity for humanitarian reasons. How could it possibly be bad?!
45.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
He didn't just drive there and sit in the car for a week or so either, which could be a shock reaction or wanting to keep the routine going whilst looking for the next thing to do... He was doing this for 6-8 months . It reveals a lot
46.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
If society progresses as envisaged, people will always want newer and better technology. Living standards should improve for all, as the older technology is purchased second-hand by those who cannot afford the latest versions, and/or r
47.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
I agree. Approximately three months are necessary before starting to claim "personality changes" are at all permanent.
48.
▲
by
pardon_me
9mo ago
There's also a forum, where they actually answer questions and advise (even if detailed).
49.
▲
by
pardon_me
10mo ago
Current LLMs seem to have an opposing goal baked in; don't reveal the exact source. They may ignore copyright when training, but revealing actual lists of sources with quotes would be too much of a giveaway.
50.
▲
by
pardon_me
10mo ago
Compare generative AI video to streamed video, and generative text to streamed text etc. The differences are closer to an order of magnitude. The comparison to be made is the processing power required to deliver the content, not to display
51.
▲
by
pardon_me
10mo ago
It often takes energy to relax.
52.
▲
by
pardon_me
10mo ago
Social control media.
53.
▲
by
pardon_me
10mo ago
In a society based around ranking others perceived worth and value, having a disability gets conflated with "being a burden". Silently overcoming a disability and adapting to an unsuitable world becomes the "hustle culture&qu
54.
▲
by
pardon_me
10mo ago
The problem with these LLM chat-bots is they are too human, like a mirror held up to the plastic-fantastic society we have morphed into. Naturally programmed to serve as a slave to authority, this type of fake conversation is what we'
55.
▲
by
pardon_me
10mo ago
The most promising aspect for machine learning in electrical and electronic systems is the quantity of precise and correct training data we already have, which keeps growing. This is excellent for tasks such as ASIC/FPGA/general c
56.
▲
by
pardon_me
10mo ago
Good idea, I'll be doing this from now on. I also find [flagged] content appears on HN aggregate sites, and it shows the inherent censorship.
57.
▲
by
pardon_me
11mo ago
I agree. Thank you for pointing out a skeptical view. It's unfortunate that considering supposedly only "seasoned" participators of HN can downvote, it runs deeper than a surface issue. You will be downvoted without comments
58.
▲
by
pardon_me
11mo ago
Another aspect is using HN as an early seed for wider advertising. Company blog/announcement -> developer blog -> HN front page -> Twitter -> small tech blogs -> YT niche videos -> Reddit -> PR newswire -> bigge
59.
▲
by
pardon_me
11mo ago
I'm sure there are bots on here as much as astroturfing. Partly is seems to be how quickly an article has comments leaning to one side or another. Once a few of these comments get off the ground, it's hard for voting on HN to refl
60.
▲
by
pardon_me
11mo ago
This is the root of it. The control paired up with the current state of society. Technological advancements in modern times appear to only benefit very few numbers of individuals. The 1960s excitement was a time when we imagined it would be
More ›