paradite

32 ms·

1. 241.▲
   by paradite 2y ago

   Does Microsoft Office in early days of Mac OS count? I guess not.
2. 242.▲
   by paradite 2y ago

   Not enough users, too ahead of its time (nobody wants full-stack JS application, yet), severe performance issues beyond simple demo. I think the team behind Meteor.js went on to build a new product ( https://www.apollographql.com&
3. 243.▲
   by paradite 2y ago

   There was one, it is called Meteor.js. However, it is widely regarded as ahead of its time. Maybe the time is now?
4. 244.▲
   by paradite 2y ago

   I use GitHub Copilot for simple tasks like line completion and writing functions. For bigger tasks I use ChatGPT macOS desktop app. I also built a simple desktop tool ( https://prompt.16x.engineer/ ) that help me embed source
5. 245.▲
   ChatGPT Plus vs. API: Cost Comparison(prompt.16x.engineer)

   1 points by paradite 2y ago|0 comments
6. 246.▲
   by paradite 2y ago

   Cool! Didn't know there's a free service. Gonna give it a try this weekend!
7. 247.▲
   by paradite 2y ago

   Static ip is the problem where I live.
8. 248.▲
   by paradite 2y ago

   I had no idea DigitalOcean pricing has become so uncompetitive. I remember back a few years it was praised by people for how cheap it was.
9. 249.▲
   by paradite 2y ago

   Thanks. Will check it out!
10. 250.▲
    by paradite 2y ago

    I've considered self-hosting plausible but ultimately decided to pay for subscription instead, because I think self-hosting would cause more in terms of VPS hosting. The minimum requirements (4GB RAM) are too high because of the need t
11. 251.▲
    by paradite 2y ago

    One thing that matters a lot is the prompt. A good prompt can dramatically improve the performance and quality of the code output from ChatGPT. It took me months of trial and error to optimize the prompt for using ChatGPT to write code. I w
12. 252.▲
    by paradite 2y ago

    Locally running LLMs in Apr 2024 are no where close to GPT-4 in terms of coding capabilities.
13. 253.▲
    by paradite 2y ago

    My bet is that the future of software engineering will "shift left" towards product requirement completion rather than focusing on writing raw source code. More emphasis will be on how to translate requirements into software, with
14. 254.▲
    by paradite 2y ago

    Cool, so that's what I was missing all along! Unfortunately looks like I can't use it now since I am using `next-plausible` which does require a Node.js proxy...
15. 255.▲
    by paradite 2y ago

    I understand that ISG requires a server (Node.js runtime) to run it, that's why I want to disable it for my SSG Next.js static site, but I can't figure out how. I just want static hosting like S3+Cloudfront which is much faster.
16. 256.▲
    by paradite 2y ago

    Tell me about it. My simple SSG Next.js static site loads much slower than my Jekyll site on GitHub pages. And I can't figure out how to improve its speed or disable the "ISG" feature that I believe is to be blamed for the po
17. 257.▲
    by paradite 2y ago

    I think Vercel and Next.js are built by the same group of people, the same people who made Now.sh, started the company (Zeit), then changed product name to Now.sh, then changed company and product name to Vercel.
18. 258.▲
    by paradite 2y ago

    I built a desktop tool to help reduce the amount of copy-pasting and improve the output quality for coding using ChatGPT or Claude: https://prompt.16x.engineer/
19. 259.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    And how much RAM do you need to run Mixtral 8*22B? Probably not enough on a personal laptop.
20. 260.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    I made an encyclopedia for frontend with json and markdown: https://github.com/paradite/frontend-encyclopedia
21. 261.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    Sometimes they also drive you insane, especially if you are over-attached to them: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33455853
22. 262.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    The real lesson here is that as a founder, don't spend too much time discussing with your users on discord. Gathering feedback good. But getting involved in philosophical discussion or how to run the company looks like a bad idea.
23. 263.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    I use GitHub Copilot for code completion with VS Code, and ChatGPT for small feature development or refactoring. I also built a simple desktop app to streamline the workflow for using ChatGPT (reduce amount of copy-pasting): https:/&#
24. 264.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    Hi, for somewhere between GitHub Copilot and aider, you can try the desktop app 16x Prompt. I have been using it daily for the past few months and it suits my working style nicely. It is capable of handling complex tasks like feature develo
25. 265.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    That's exactly how I started as well, I was using a similar workflow to build an AI-driven game. Then I thought maybe it's a good idea to turn it into something less ad-hoc, more user-friendly, and work for any project.
26. 266.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    If you prefer GUI with more space to write task requirements, or use your existing ChatGPT/Claude subscription without additional API costs, you can check out my desktop app: https://prompt.16x.engineer/
27. 267.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    I've been using 16x Prompt to construct prompts with source code context and pasting the final prompt into ChatGPT web UI: https://prompt.16x.engineer/ Disclosure: I built it.
28. 268.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    You can get the baseline GPT-4 model without new system prompts via ChatGPT Classic: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-YyyyMT9XH-chatgpt-classic It is an official GPT provided by ChatGPT with GPT-4 as backend.
29. 269.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    Well you can get the baseline GPT-4 model without new system prompts via ChatGPT Classic: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-YyyyMT9XH-chatgpt-classic It is an official GPT provided by ChatGPT with GPT-4 as backend.
30. 270.▲
    by paradite 3y ago

    I wrote something similar, but ranging from L1 to L5: https://prompt.16x.engineer/blog/ai-coding-l1-l5