par1970

6 ms·

31.
by par1970 7mo ago
What models + versions are you using? Is it bad at designing systems that don't have a bunch of integrations?
32.
by par1970 7mo ago
> I don't use ChatGPT, but i've been using an agent with Claude Sonnet 4. Are you using Sonnet 4.6? > So this AI Agent... It is much faster at doing code when given specific instructions. But it keeps loosing context on arch
33.
by par1970 7mo ago
Which models + versions are you using? Can you give a specific problem that you found them to be bad at?
34.
Ask HN: Are the newest LLMs better than you at programming?
4 points by par1970 7mo ago|19 comments
35.
by par1970 11mo ago
Maybe we are talking past one another. > Right, but that's explicitly not the body of government meant to represent people. I haven't claimed that the Senate was intended to represent the people. I also haven't claimed th
36.
by par1970 11mo ago
I think OP is arguing that because they literally said "The Senate is fundamentally a ridiculous way of representing 350 million people and we’re going to continue to get absurd unrepresentative outcomes for as long as it remains a rel
37.
by par1970 11mo ago
Are you arguing this? (Premise 1) If a country has 350 million people, then the Senate will produce unrepresentative outcomes. (Premise 2) America has 350 million people. (Conclusion 1) So, the Senate will produce unrepresentative outcomes
38.
by par1970 1y ago
> We're nowhere close to AGI and don't have a clue how to get there. Do you have an argument?
39.
by par1970 1y ago
So do we already do this? And if not, why not?
40.
by par1970 1y ago
> Sadly, the answer is that you can't. Suppose there are two distinct entities, each such that if it is learned about, then it kills the learner, call them Geigh and Ritaar. What happens when Geigh learns about Ritaar?
41.
by par1970 1y ago
How did you make a blank comment? I thought hn prevented it
42.
by par1970 1y ago
How is that the same thing?
43.
by par1970 2y ago
Okay. So, in your original comment are you asserting that teachers are mostly telling students to believe propositions without giving any epistemic justification for those propositions?
44.
by par1970 2y ago
Does “self-evident” just mean that anyone who knows the sentence’s meaning can determine that it is true without any need to gather empirical data? eg, All bachelors are unmarried. eg, If X is a triangle, then X has three sides. eg, the wor
45.
by par1970 2y ago
> In order to not have to explain everything, almost all lessons are mostly teaching you some axioms, even if they really are disputed, or have caveats, etc. Good teachers make clear where there is an axiom, and where something is just b
46.
by par1970 4y ago
What about the guys who thought it was obviously a remote starter?
47.
by par1970 5y ago
It looks to me that you are expressing a preference for democracy relative to autocracy. I assume this preference is based on a historical evaluation of the performance of democratic and autocratic governments? For example, Nazi Germany a
48.
by par1970 5y ago
In what way does it feel different and why does this difference suggest a higher probability of truth?
49.
by par1970 5y ago
I think that anyone who believed in Santa Clause as a kid should automatically discredit any “intuition” they have about things. How much more evidence do you need that you’ll just believe in kooky nice sounding things? Maybe you didn’t be
50.
by par1970 5y ago
Right, what I’m trying to say is that I don’t think the label genocide adds anything to the conversation. We can say there were this many murders and this many sterilizations and this much property damage and then do whatever restitution c
51.
by par1970 5y ago
What is the test for deciding whether a policy is “genocidal”? And are “genocidal” policies somehow different from policies that can be shown to have caused harm? And if so are they somehow worse or more deserving of recompense than this ca
52.
by par1970 5y ago
> Ah, I see you're an adherent of the "finders-genocide, finders'-grandkids'-keepers" sociopolitical philosophy. Are you saying that I and every other human are owed for any and all unrecompensed wrongs committed
53.
by par1970 5y ago
> It's also probably the reason so many of our sports teams bear the images of peoples we committed quasi-genocide [3] against. Who is “we”? You weren’t alive for the so-called genocide and neither was I nor anyone else on hn for t