Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
panstromek
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
I have no intention to stop writing on my blog for AI reasons and I don't even see why I should. I suspect a majority of people who post here are the same.
92.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
That's a false dichotomy - clearly there's more options than these two. There's definitely a better way to address this issue. On the other hand, between those two, it arguably is worse, because we now live in worst of both w
93.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
If the law incentivises bad behaviour, it's a bad law.
94.
▲
You can't rob a bank to take its fortune
(yoyo-code.com)
2 points
by
panstromek
1y ago
|
0 comments
95.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
I find both the article and the title a bit too simplistic for the topic. This is the classic "build vs buy" problem and I think it's one of the hardest problems in softare development and maybe engineering in general. I'
96.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
I also don't quite like TigerBeetle as an example, because it is very new startup. They are pre-1.0 and just a bit more than a year since production release. It's way too early to tell whether their approach actually paid off.
97.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
> some are able to operate even when affected by electronic signal jamming Not even that. The new hotness are the fiber optic cable ones that don't even use radio signals, that's some scary stuff.
98.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
Note that most of the emissions come from fairly mundane stuff, notably heating and road transport. Tackling those is fairly straghtforward without that many changes in lifestyle. The last ~20% is where it becomes really difficult without m
99.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
Honestly, these articles are borderline misinformation in my opinion. All of them do a lot of guesswork and cherry picking data to make cool headlines. The first one chooses somewhat arbitrary date of 2019 to make the 51% figure stand out.
100.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
Glad I'm not the only one to see the disconnect here. I thought I'm somehow missing rest of the paper text, it really doesn't say all that much compared to the article interpretation.
101.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
No, it wasn't wrong, because "oil reserves" are defined as: "quantities of crude oil and natural gas from known fields that can be profitably produced/recovered from an approved development", which means they c
102.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
That was true back then though. It boils down to how oil "reserve" is defined, which is all about oil we know how to extract.
103.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
The keyword here is "Long term" I suppose, that can mean anything. I couldn't actually find where this claim comes from. The referenced paper doesn't seem to say anything about doubling CO2 concetrations.
104.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
> The damage, and yet not a single country is willing to do anything serious in that regard. This just doesn't correspond to reality. A lot of serious stuff is happening in this space.
105.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
I don't quite like littering the code with logs, but I understand there's a value to it. The problem is that if you only log problems or "important" things, then you have a selection bias in the log and don't have a
106.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
Sure, but you said that "businesses on the web directly benefit from things being not accessible." which is obviously not true in gereal. Every business would be stupid to not make their checkout form accesible, for example.
107.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
That's pretty selective view of the problem. And I'm also pretty sure it's at least partially a fallacy that even some these businesses are fooled by. Removing friction often increases your revenue, that's been shown in
108.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
Concept Processor actually sounds pretty good, I like it. That's pretty close to how I treat LLMs.
109.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
Interesting. This says a different thing than what I thought from the title. I thought this will be about cognitive overload from having to process and review all the text the LLM generates. I had to disable copilot for my blog project in t
110.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
The curb cut is not even that good, the new hotness are elevated crosswalks. Smooth paving also makes a big diffeerence. My wife is on a wheelchair and it's hard to overstate how much these little things improve her life. > We all b
111.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
Those are some good reasons, and I can admit that they work on me. The testing one is big, I don't want add a bunch of artificial attributes just match an element in test, it's much more natural to just target elements semanticall
112.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
This is somewhat true but also a bit misleading. Lot of the problems comes from how rust interacts with it, and how are rust projects structured. This ultimately shows up as time in LLVM, but LLVM is not entirely responsible for it.
113.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
Just to clarify - polymorphization is not automatic dyn dyspatch or anything related. I'm talking about compile time optimization that avoids duplicating generic functions.
114.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
There are many more mundane examples of language design choices in rust that are problematic for compile time. Polymorphization (which has big potential to speed up compile time) has been blocked on pretty obscure problems with TypeId. Proc
115.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
cargo check exists for option 1. For 2.) it depends on the project structure. Either way, they don't help as much as you would hope for.
116.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
The original title is: Why doesn't Rust care more about compiler performance?
117.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
The biggest reason for this is reuse between libraries - if you use 10 libraries, you don't want each of them to add its own leftpad. This is especially a problem if this happens in client code and you then send duplicate code to the b
118.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
Richard Hickey talked about this in his "Hammock driven development" talk: https://youtu.be/f84n5oFoZBc?si=Ups64pcKCl47nNCY
119.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
We got and update from somebody at firebase on reddit and they confirmed it was marked incorrectly: https://www.reddit.com/r/Firebase/comments/1ky75x3/comment/m... Now you can also see the warning f
120.
▲
by
panstromek
1y ago
I wrote a nostalgic post on opera mini few weeks ago ( https://yoyo-code.com/love-letter-to-opera-mini/ ) and somebody linked a project that does similar architecture but running chrome in the cloud instead, to enable fe
More ›