panick21_

5 ms·

31.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Yes, you want to do more IPC, its basically linear with the increase in performance. So the amount of overhead stays the same basically. At least in IPC benchmarks and those tend to be important. Making that fast is fundamental to any OS.
32.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
The solution is that we should give humans and waymo way less tolerance.
33.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
If you live in car sewer then slightly better shit is considered acceptable. I prefer not to live like that.
34.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Capex for countries isn't really that big of a problem. You can raise lots of capital for long term, a proper investment should increase land values (or property values). Generally societies that invest a lot of capex in high capacity
35.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
I live in Switzerland and it actually saves money for your society. Its universally considered a fantastic investment for the country and many people are happy to pay it, both in taxes and in ticket cost. You are simply applying two differe
36.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Easiest to understand their value as a pedestrian in a place that doesn't care about pedestrian and looks at their deaths as irrelevant. We know a lot about how to improve road safety for pedestrians, but its just not valued in some pl
37.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
If large corps see the value and build whole data-centers with oxide racks, a few large costumers alone can be huge. I suspect part of this raise has to with Antropic using Oxide at pretty large scale. If its really true that things will mo
38.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
I don't think that's true. Oracle just came in with clearly higher price then anybody else was willing to even consider. They could also have fired a lot of people and likely survived. But the CEO clearly had no interest in that p
39.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
You still need to do devops on your own infrastructure.
40.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
IBM stuff is likely to expensive and optimized for different things. Same for the other Post-Mainframe stuff. You would pay for a lot of stuff you don't need, and there is a reason very few new costumers adopt it. Oxide costumers want
41.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
They mean is that they are much harder to acquire. Their goal is to become an independent public company.
42.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
If all you know about public transit is CA building HIGH SPEED rail then you are not worth talking about.
43.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
> Any public dollar that gets contributed to housing ... in the US > Building housing with no parking is not feasible for 95% of deals. You simply won't get financing Because of completely broken land use, transportation polices,
44.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Some of their larger costumer might want to buy them instead so it doesn't happen.
45.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Preempted the blog post. Man, they are just sucking up capital. If somebody like Antropic has made them the primary 'CPU' rack, then that's they kind of cash you need. I mean, you could probably get multiple GIGAbytes of RAM
46.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Your point is so fucking pointless, meaningless and pedantic. People are not 'hung up' on it. Its just an irrelevant fucking point that has no practical meaning and you keep repeating it as if it had any relevance what so ever.
47.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Refueling and moon mission is not primary motivation, Starlink and so on are. You would likely have called it naive to try to develop reusability in the first place. Yes its harder. But they also have a much, much bigger team. They have an
48.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
To be fair, oil nationalization and nationalization of incredibly advanced technology companies are not the same thing. See Norway as for what's possible if you do resource nationalization correctly. But of course they do understand th
49.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Yeah so you just don't actually understand the economics. The thing is, unless you massively increase the volume of Falcon 9, you are not going to get it that much cheaper. Its already incredibly cheap given that its made out of fancy
50.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
I think one important point to stress, is yes SpaceX advantage is reusability, but even when Falcon 9 was not reusable is was utterly dominating the market and was far cheaper then anything else. It was developed cheaper with less capital a
51.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Funny how people how hate Musk always reach for the 'but Gwynne Shotwell' nonsense. Gwynne Shotwell was incredibly frustrated with the aerospace industry. So frustrated that she thought about leaving the industry. She didn't
52.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Have you actually looked up the history of government owning its own defense contractors? Please tell me you have actually learned about this history. Because if you think having things like this be nationalized, I suggest you read some of
53.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
What do you think happens to this profit? Where does it go? > You can never convince me profit is not a cost. It is a cost, but with the cost you are getting something. And NASA (the US) as it happens literally got the best deal maybe i
54.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
These are their normal prices, its actually reasonable cheap for military launch. And they have a fantastic margin on Falcon 9, at least 50% likely more.
55.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
> planning to retire in 2028. Yeah and that is not happened, its just the typical Musk style claim.
56.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Man if only SpaceX had IPO without all the xAI crap attached to it. Then it might actually be worth looking into. I wanted to invest in SpaceX for a long time but now its laughably overvalued.
57.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
They are literally the only option, the other options are strongly delayed and even when they come online they will have a large backlog and missing launch infrastructure. What do you want them to do, you magic to launch the sats?
58.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
What is this nonsense argument? Can you share more then one sentence about this? NASA own analysis suggest that Falcon 9 development (just the initial nonreusable) version would have cost 10x as much (and that is with their estimation metho
59.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
Once you add all that need on IRC its 2x as complex as matrix and harder to get into. There is a reason nobody does it.
60.
by panick21_ 2mo ago
I disagree. All these things are pretty needed. They had a lot of other projects ongoing that they spent time one, like full time developers for VR and a bunch of other things. But overall its just a tricky thing to run a project like this.

More ›