panick21

26 ms·

211.
by panick21 5y ago
Not sure if I understand. You can have battery be structural and easy to swap, these to things are not in conflict. In fact, on the Pack level, many packs are already structural. Switching individual modules inside of packs is pretty terrib
212.
by panick21 5y ago
Model S Plaid just had amazing reviews by pretty much ever reviewer. Check list make sense for all manufactures. > These things are built in tents by staff that is treated quite poorly, and you should be skeptical in proportion to that
213.
by panick21 5y ago
> The Hyperloop, is something Musk spent over a calendar year and numerous engineering assets working on before he decided to give up and open-source their work. If any of his projects was an unreserved failure, it was the hyperloop. Can
214.
by panick21 5y ago
I am talking about the overall architecture to make your typical highway standard lane keeping solution. Pretty much every manufacture now has one and they always use forward facing camera and radar in combination. Of course the radar can&#
215.
by panick21 5y ago
If anything I think they would 'sell' this as a cloud service I would think. But it would be a while before that happens.
216.
by panick21 5y ago
All radar based lane keeping solutions have this problem. That is why Tesla is moving away from them. The current version of Autopilot already will no longer have the same issue. If you buy a Model Y or Model 3 in the US, it has no radar an
217.
by panick21 5y ago
The Autopilot is also moving away from Radar. In the US, new Model 3 or Y don't have Radar anymore.
218.
by panick21 5y ago
They do use maps but not HD maps.
219.
by panick21 5y ago
Is this power from the top method something other people do?
220.
by panick21 5y ago
The waste majority of the event was not him talking.
221.
by panick21 5y ago
As usual, anytime Elon say anything a army of expert come out overstating what he actually said and saying what a gigantic moron he is. Where did they claim they will make a better product next year then Boston Dynamics? I am pretty sure th
222.
by panick21 5y ago
Man, you really lake a sense of humor. I was literally a joke. Comparing that to a scam is the dumbest thing I have read in these comments. > That's on top of the news that the Cybertruck just got delayed. A major industrial project
223.
by panick21 5y ago
> SolarCity SolarCity was not Musk lead company, he was just an investor. SolarCity was acquired and is part of Tesla and while they had to remove resources from Solar during the manufacturing difficulty and scaling difficulty the solar
224.
by panick21 5y ago
Ah this old Musk-Hater mantra. The 'Gwynne' does everything trope. Gwynne is an excellent manager and I don't want to say anything bad about her and SpaceX is lucky to have her but the idea that she is 'main driver'
225.
by panick21 5y ago
I really don't get the problem here. They want to work on a very difficult problem, they have admitted it is difficult. Are people angry that Musk said he will have a prototype in a 18 month? Are they angry because he dared even mentio
226.
by panick21 5y ago
No it isn't. That literally the dumbest thing I have read in this thread. So your friend is the CEO two of the most successful tech companies of the decade. Specially a person with the history of having the exact follow-through you cri
227.
by panick21 5y ago
This is just such nonsense, sometimes I question if people ever actually adsorb information or just form lose association and then form an opinion based on how much they like the person involved. > Remember the Cybertruck? Cybertruck is
228.
by panick21 5y ago
> First, no one denies that reusability is still not profitable. This includes Musk himself and heads of all the other rocket companies who have all made it clear they aren't pursing it because these is simply no business case for i
229.
by panick21 5y ago
> I realize they explained how they source the videos, which is in direct contradiction to previous claims. No it isn't. You don't seem to understand the billions miles of driving compared to how much of that was actually uploa
230.
by panick21 5y ago
> - They only use SRAM, no DRAM. This is a huge mistake This seems pretty interesting. They must have had a reason for this approach. Maybe it doesn't matter as much for their usecase. They clearly had the option of adding DRAM if t
231.
by panick21 5y ago
> Waymo and cruise especially, but even a number of others, have demonstrated better autonomy than Tesla. Have they? They have a different approach where they focus huge effort on individual Geo-fenced locations and they both are losing
232.
by panick21 5y ago
There are more the 1 million Tesla on the road. And they say they are using 1.5 million clips for the training. How is that even remotely unreasonable? And they are not uploading hours of video at the time. They literally explained in detai
233.
by panick21 5y ago
I'm not sure how that disproves anything I said. Just announcing a electric version and producing a million of them are quite different. Even if the F-150 electric becomes the best selling electric vehicle, that doesn't change my
234.
by panick21 5y ago
Like a year ago people were 'omg Tesla PE ratio is 1000'. Its actually 174.87 now. PE is literally the worst way to evaluate a company that is growing. But seriously, that is one of the single worst ways to evaluate a company and
235.
by panick21 5y ago
That not at all the case. The robot was not supposed to be 'out' next year. He said they might have the first prototype built next year. Those are very different things. And Dojo is clearly advanced state, as they show the hardwar
236.
by panick21 5y ago
Why are people so obsessed with this. I mean literally he said he was not gone work on it. He said that literally from the beginning. Yet people think 'He never build Hyperloop' is a great comeback to anything any of his companies
237.
by panick21 5y ago
A lot of people want to talk about the Tesla Bot. That is clearly in the early stages. Can we talk about Dojo? This seems like a pretty crazy projects. A fully integrated super computer designed from core to multi-rack design. I have never
238.
by panick21 5y ago
There is a reason the evaluations are different: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9FARebWUAYd5NI?format=jpg&name=... Many of the production facilities that Ford uses, and huge sunk cost in things like engine production
239.
by panick21 5y ago
I disagree, I think its much more fundamental then simply saving a few $. This goes for lidar and the interior, is simply what the believe the right solution is. If they could save 100$ per car and have a traditional interior, I don't
240.
by panick21 5y ago
Can you point me to literally any evidence what so ever that the results fake? Is the FSD Beta regularly crashing into things it put at the wrong range? Tesla has cars with Lidar on the road to check the models as well. And who says anythin

More ›