Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pandaman
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
211.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
Cyclists can slow down when there is an obstacle in front of them. But they cannot teleport away when a pedestrian runs into the side of the bike.
212.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
That's an issue on any bike path in the US, even if it's a fire road in the middle of nowhere. I bet there are people walking their dogs or checking Instagram on the single track course that is used for the Red Bull Rampage.
213.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
I don't follow. The example in the wikipedia uses the opposite error rates to what you have given: it falsely flags a sober driver in 5% of cases. And it works because the stipulated rate of drunkenness is much lower than 5% (0.1%) so
214.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
You asked and LLM but don't seem to be able to understand the reply. Again, you proclaimed that dual intent means something else initially. >"H-1B is “coming temporarily,” while permanent residence is handled through the employ
215.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
I am just factually dug on this. You are correct that H1B applicants can intend to immigrate. It's what "dual intent" means. It does not mean the H1B is an immigrant visa or a "path to a Green Card" like you claimed
216.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
> it's both a temporary working visa and a path to a Green Card. It's not though. It's a DoS policy wrt of issuing non-immigrant visas. >Yes, the government issues I-140s to H1-Bs So? The government issues I-140s to non
217.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
Most, if not all, politicians have a higher education of some kind. Higher education institutions make big money from international students, who only go for their overpriced education because of the possibility to work in the US. And it&#x
218.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
What doe "dual intent" mean and can you show me any government statement confirming that it's a path to a Green Card?
219.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
I feel you want to talk about ICE and DHS instead of the topic at hand, the Deep State/"civil service". I feel the government contracting private companies is fine, the government is accountable so are the private companies.
220.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
There are many things that are not in the Constitution: the USAF, computers, antibiotics, sea cruises, cars, steak, etc. Not being in the Constitution does not make them unconstitutional. Hope this helps. As for dissolution of those agencie
221.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
That means the whole Executive branch is the president and if he can delegate his power to some other people he also should be able to revoke the delegation and fire those people, which is not the case now. The president is semi-successful
222.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
The Constitution defines just three branches of power, if the "civil service system" has a power and is not one of the branches then it unconstitutional by common sense and elementary logic. And this "civil servant system&quo
223.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
Then back to the system defined in the Constitution, it gives enough guidance. If you think the President is not enough for the Executive - amend the Constitution, used to be enough for ~200 years though.
224.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
Calling it "civil service" instead of "deep state" does not make it any better. We don't have either in the Constitution so whatever you call it, it has to be removed from power.
225.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
You have not heard people complaining about cities impeding traffic, likely, because of the bubble you live in. That is the thing that makes regular people to run for the city offices. A whole lot of recent "urbanization" is not g
226.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
Many people are not driven entirely by their economic interests, thus you can see people wearing clothes not from the Walmart bargain bin, driving cars with electric windows, and eating out instead of cooking rice and beans at home. Renters
227.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
There is a difference but not in the way you think. Producing an asset is just buying other assets and labor. The difference with buying an asset is that a part of the assets you bought for production is illiquid for a term of the productio
228.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
Nailguns are not as complicated as you think, anybody with IQ over 80 can be trained to the top proficiency in 30 mins. Same goes for other power tools, they are generally much easier to use and more productive than their human-powered equi
229.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
Not sure what this revelation has to do with what I wrote, could you elaborate?
230.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
For the 2003 Iraq war, US managed to goad 48 countries to get involved [1] For the 2026 Iran war, it looks more like the US was goaded itself. The current coalition consists of Israel and a dozen of Middle East countries providing bases to
231.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
So here's your answer, nobody is obligated to address every BS. There are no US/Israel assets in Afghanistan and Iran hasn't attacked Afghanistan.
232.
▲
by
pandaman
7mo ago
>What US/Israel assets are in Afghanistan? When did Iran attack Afghanistan? I've never heard of this and googling does not return anything.
233.
▲
by
pandaman
8mo ago
Is this an AI slop or you just don't understand English? I pointed out that a city with tons of infrastructure still has the vast majority of winter trips (and other trips too, but bike ridership drops in winter) not done on bikes and
234.
▲
by
pandaman
8mo ago
So Canadians bike less in winter than some Finns (not all, as the author of the video himself mentions that Oulu stands out among Finnish cities in this regard) yet those Finns make only 12% of winter trips by bike. That means the vast majo
235.
▲
by
pandaman
8mo ago
West Berlin was a part of Germany under US/UK/French occupation, I have not heard anybody referring to it as being "behind the iron curtain" before. What would be the reason for the above countries to completely erase mu
236.
▲
by
pandaman
8mo ago
Which Aeroflot flights were hijacked and flown to West Berlin? I've never heard of this. Funny though that Windows Copilot believes this happened and says that: "On December 12, 1978, two Soviet citizens hijacked an Aeroflot Yak‑4
237.
▲
by
pandaman
8mo ago
>Finland retained its independence. As same as all other Axis powers and their allies, nobody wanted to annex them.
238.
▲
by
pandaman
8mo ago
> India announced they will not buy Russian oil I am not sure where did you get this, there is no such announcement publicly available. > but it will be difficult to get back to normal as long as Putin is alive There won't be a r
239.
▲
by
pandaman
8mo ago
Saying the same thing without exaggerating doesn't make it true. Russian economy is growing, it's the rate of growth is going down. As for Russia returning to normal relations with the rest of the world: it's normal already.
240.
▲
by
pandaman
8mo ago
Russia had been under sanctions since 2014 and in January of 2015 its economy was already "in tatters", as reported by Obama in the State of the Union that year. Then, in March of 2022, great Joe Biden proclaimed that he has turne
More ›