Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pandaman
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
661.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
When were you told to drive gently after starting the engine? That was a legitimate issue with early turbos, which would break if you tried to spin them up cold, and that was eventually solved in order to put a turbo in every car nowadays.
662.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
You cannot take away a right to enter the US from somebody who does not have it in the first place. Only citizens and permanent residents have such a right. Even people given a visa do not have this right, they still can be turned away at t
663.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
> The car coming from the right has to slow down in order to take the roundabout. Why? We are talking about people, who don't pay attention and drive through an intersection, the same people won't pay attention and won't s
664.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
I, on the other hand, have seen much fewer people running red (and that only when the red just switched on, without any cross traffic yet) than people taking left on a roundabout. So by your own method you can ignore people running red ligh
665.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
The protection is just by hiding half of the traffic beyond an obstacle, you can still get t-boned on the roundabout, but only by the cars from your right and not from both directions like on an intersection. I guess it's a plus but wi
666.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
You apparently need to pay fees, get passport stamp, get TB test, register somewhere etc.
667.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
Pretty much feudalism: the current middle class would have to rent housing and agricultural land, owned by corporations, where the heirs of the current upper class hold high-paying but undemanding positions.
668.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
The tax code in 1940 was not the current code with different rates but a different code entirely. To make an example (I am not a CPA and even less so a 1940s CPA): if you could have deducted your living expenses (food, rent/mortgage, c
669.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
You asked "Can someone explain why work visas are an acceptable thing?". It's literally a power of Congress.
670.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
The Congress is given the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations by the Constitution.
671.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
> because the frail old lady can call the police, who outnumber and outgun the strong young men. Indeed, the law is ultimately based on force but it still does allow physically weak to have rights, unlike a natural law.
672.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
They are precisely not that. A frail old lady can have property rights and use them to force strong young men off her property.
673.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
Whatever you have is not a Netherlands work permit though because[1]: "Change of employer or job The residence permit is valid as long as you meet the requirements. This can also be the case if you change employers or job. If you no lo
674.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
>Ownership doesn’t exist in nature What do you call the territorial animals then? A tiger will chase other tigers from the area it considers its own. Same as wolves and many other species. It's not exactly property in the sense that
675.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31113021/
676.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
There is a principal difference between "we won't enforce all laws on some people" and "we won't enforce some laws on all people".
677.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
Yeah, it had different algorithm to render inventory and also could add/remove some objects to the background (those figures in dresses do not move if I recall, only toggle in and out). The inventory was not free camera with only contr
678.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
Unless you mean pre-rendered backgrounds, there was no Gouraud shading in that game. It does seem to have a little texturing on some parts of the model, most likely ramp lighting and pretty expensive as they could not texture the whole char
679.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
As per [1]: "29 000 highly qualified non-EU workers received an EU Blue Card in 2021, giving them comprehensive socio-economic rights and a residence in the EU." it's unclear how many applied but if the process is as easy as
680.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
It's a bound, non-negative function on [0,1], equal 0 at 0 and 1 and having non-zero values at least in some points on (0,1). You are saying it's never been proven that such a function will have a maximum value somewhere in (0,1)
681.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
There are corded blowers, mowers, weed-whackers, and chainsaws. Those are not for indoor use.
682.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
Most people already pay rent for housing, going from rent payments to mortgage payments is not a huge change for them. Down payment is harder as most people usually don't accumulate large quantities of cash.
683.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
Same here, you came out and claimed there is no forced membership in NBA and SAG, which I took in good faith and did some research. It appears that no, you really cannot play in NBA or Hollywood without being a member in some sense (paying
684.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
Well, you said it's not true that you can play in Hollywood and NBA w/o being a union member. Apparently either it's true (even Joh Voight you gave as an example has to become a member to do Hollywood production as in pay due
685.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
>An actor who refuses to join the union will have a harder time getting work This does not make membership an option, does it then? This is exactly the reason programmers like myself oppose the unions. Bringing up SAG in this context see
686.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
>It is much harder in Hollywood than in the NBA Can you expand on this, what is "harder" exactly? They don't enjoy the benefits of the union or they cannot get high paying roles? Also, are you implying Jon Voight is not a
687.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
I am not sure what is the point you are trying to make, had LeBron James and Tom Cruise made a choice to join a union? Was the not joining an option for either of them? From what I know you cannot play in NBA nor you can play in Hollywood w
688.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
I believe you are now trying word games, with going from value to some undefined quantities. Evidently the society values the fund manager's contribution more than a nurse's. If it's "more" or "less" depen
689.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
Is someone digging trenches from dusk to dawn giving a lot to the society even if nobody asked for that and pays nothing for it? From the perspective of "hard work is always great" she or he does, from the perspective "the ma
690.
▲
by
pandaman
3y ago
It's a simple explanation and not a justification. From your comment I figured you don't seem to understand but it appears you don't want to accept it, that's fine too.
More ›