Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pandaman
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
451.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
I understand that. But even if you come up with a classifier that gives better false positives and false negatives rates than the existing process, it's still going to be tuned towards minimizing false positives and leaving false negat
452.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
This is what we get for replacing education with googling... Are you suggesting replacing interviews with some other metrics?
453.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
The more you try to decrease false positives, the more you get false negatives, this is something taught in any intermediate Statistics class. Different people may have different opinions on what rate of false positives is acceptable but on
454.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
According to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue_Act_of_1913#:~:text=... . that "lot" was just 3% of the population.
455.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
UK courts could be different, or you actually might not know the law as much as you think you do, or you might not be informed of job prospects of people who had access to important business info and no non-compete... Fact is that if what y
456.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
So, in the US all such "unpacking" is done by lawyers at $500+ per hour. You just showed that in absence of non-compete hiring someone from a competitor could turn into a multi-million lawsuit. This is why such a legal climate is
457.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
>If the clients are already customers of the new company, then he can make them offers which he knows they would find tempting. There'd be nothing to suggest he ever did anything untoward, and even if a case was made, it'd be t
458.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
I gave you an example in my first response to you: a sales manager, knowing the current contracts, can offer better contracts from a competitor without revealing any protected data. I am not interested in ethics, I asked how do existing thi
459.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
>Taking customer data would be considered as a form of corporate espionage Again, the same point: if you left the job where you used customer data then how do you deal with that data in your memory? Either you don't give any reason
460.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
So it appears the US non-competes are more relaxed than UK ones? In the US non-competes are limited to the actual competition though the pay may or may not be reduced if you work. >Typically, if the employee took commercially sensitive c
461.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
> In the EU and UK, the general rule is that you employment contract ends as soon as the company stops paying you. It's essentially the same in the US, you cannot really enforce a non-compete without pay. Some companies still do th
462.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
>I disagree. I don't think this is true. That's a given. You believe most people who own a truck never driven in snow, never put anything in the bed, never drove over water, never towed anything, right? Your right to believe su
463.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
You do get invalid states with exceptions in much worse way. Think exception thrown from a constructor, or, even better, from a constructor of one of the members even before the constructor's body is reached. Not to mention managing st
464.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
>Most people never do that stuff. Most people who don't own a truck, I suppose? Because most people who own one do some truck-y things with it once in a while. > Coupes are certainly not cheaper nor more efficient The base model
465.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
Yeah, people usually don't tow, off-road, drive through unplowed streets covered with snow 3 feet high, ford through a flash flood, transport vehicles or big appliances, or gardening or construction supplies etc. But people still do
466.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
Put two mountain bikes in a Prius and drive to a singletrack trailhead then tell again how it's objectively better. But on a serious note, there are many more reasons to have a truck than towing. I understand that it's disturbin
467.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
That's because of the fixed cost of making another model of a car. Look at what happened to Stellantis trying to bring Fiat 500: after three years of great sales it started to drop pretty quickly to the point where they sold only 16 in
468.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
That's because few really like unbound density, people who move to cities want more density than a SFH-on-an-acre and/or perhaps can tolerate more of it but they do not enjoy density per se and don't "upgrade" by mo
469.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
>Does anyone know in general why rental properties aren't negotiated further in advance? Define "in general". All big landlords (Greystar and such) want you to sign lease extension 3-4 months before the current term ends w
470.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
I am not an off-roader by any stretch of imagination, but I figure the AWD works like single axle drive with a simple diff on each axle i.e. if one wheel has no traction then all torque goes to that wheel and zero goes to the opposite one.
471.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
>There was no "er,...,hhmmm, wow, ugh" in the commenter's post Why lie if a simple search can prove you wrong?
472.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
Changing incentives does not change what people want , it can only change what people do , IME. And I am pretty sure I described why I think so in my post - the incentives in the USSR were against private ownership of cars yet people stil
473.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
This is a tired meme and essentially an ad hominem "silly Americans never experienced civilization so they don't know better", often repeated by American "urbanists" too. I grew up in Moscow, USSR. With 2 min subway
474.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
This is because of nuisance and the lack of private law enforcement. People will still park illegally if there is no parking in your establishment and the other people who will be affected by the illegal parking, will get upset, will call p
475.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
So if I got you right, you are saying that not enough money had been spent on the government housing (after insisting it will cost mere pittance to build and maintain)? These programs were not cheap already so whatever you propose should co
476.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
Getting a person a room is, indeed, cheaper than running the whole criminal justice system if there had been such a person, giving a room to whom would stop all the homeless crime I'd be first to pay for their room my own personal mone
477.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
Not really, they existed before cars. As I said they are dictated by the fire safety, flooding danger and nuisance concerns. All the stuff you read on Reddit ("people want to live in tiny apartments but those are illegal to build"
478.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
I don't know where you live but in every city in the US I had been there are minimum lot sizes and setbacks to prevent fires and flooding and those leave plenty of room for parking so I don't see how walking could change that (it&
479.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
The pre-car Europe and the US were not low traffic. E.g. the main street (Nevsky Avenue) in St. Petersburg, Russia is 200 feet wide since 1760s (and it was expanded from the original 65 feet because that was not enough for traffic).
480.
▲
by
pandaman
2y ago
I usually eat out so my diet is quite varied, which is another problem for walking advocates because they are limited only to the restaurants in their walking distance, or cold soggy deliveries, or, ultimately, have to spend a lot of time c
More ›