Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
p_ing
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
181.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Depends on what you're building an ARM system for. There are proper ARM servers out there; server work isn't the exclusive domain of x86, after all. For homelabs, that's out the window. Do whatever you want/fits your nee
182.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Typically you want stability and predictability in a server. A platform that has a long support lifecycle is often more attractive than one with a short lifecycle. If you can stay on v12.x for 10 years versus having to upgrade yearly yo mai
183.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Well, except the FreeBSD Foundation explicitly says MIT was chosen for interoperability. Are you disputing the FreeBSD Foundation document?
184.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
This [0] may provide a hint. Heimdal was developed outside of the US and not subject to export restrictions, unlike MIT. So perhaps in the beginning it wasn’t the package of choice to begin with. And this [1] says for interoperability reaso
185.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Dang, your failure modes certainly are extreme. What companies actually performed a from-scratch rebuild because they failed to take a backup or thought "today's thursday, it's too complicated to restore!"? If an "O
186.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Again, I don't think this was reviewed. It was an assignment to a vendor 'write document and I'll hit publish'. There's a great chance the MSFT document _owner_ has no experience in the relevant area.
187.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
What? This is how it works. There are too many people here like the op that make assumptions on what the process is/should be.
188.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Did the one MSFT employee that “reviewed” it know of this image? If not, it doesn’t matter how many people “on the Internet” recognized this image. I’ll never understand the implied projection. (I don’t think this was reviewed closely if at
189.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
There is no singular publishing org at MSFT. Each product publishes its own docs, generally following a style guide. But the doc process is up to the doc owner(s).
190.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
You said it takes multiple people screwing up, implying that publishing content had multiple gates/reviewers. It doesn’t.
191.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
You’re incorrect on how the publishing process works. If a vendor wrote the document, it has a single repo owner (all those docs are in github) that would need to sign off on a PR. There isn’t multiple layers or really any friction to get
192.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Become an FTE at MSFT. All of the FTEs go to meetings all day while the vendors do the work!
193.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Correct title: AI Sprite Generator Pixel artists dominate the indie scene, these aren't the people losing their jobs to AI. Major developers at the behest of fans dissuade the use of AI for art generation (at least the art that gets pu
194.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
For HN, it would be better to point to the website rather than an app - https://www.oddsrabbit.com/ . Looks like it has the same poisonous new reddit-style infinite scroll/low post density where any discussion is a seco
195.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Playing TFC, I always got faster ping times than the early cable users. ISDN was great.
196.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1998/09/02/i-don-t-care-lat...
197.
▲
History of AT&T Long Lines
(telephoneworld.org)
85 points
by
p_ing
8mo ago
|
51 comments
198.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Why is an oft-wrong rumor site which churns out clickbait left and right being pushed up on HN? There's no story, here. It has no reliable source and nothing coming directly from Apple. macrumors.com, 9to5mac.com should have been [dead
199.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Sure, you can take on that technical debt! ;-)
200.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Did you not read that it was a joke?
201.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
You're misremembering the young web.
202.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
The young WWW had garish flashing banner ads.
203.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Hey I have a PC running 98SE ;-) I feel for those who have to support an OS no longer supported by the vendor. That's a tough position to be in, not only if a customer comes across a bug that is due to the OS, but it keeps you from adv
204.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/main/release-notes/10.0/... .NET 10 supports a Windows 10 build from 10 years ago.
205.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
.NET runtime is not shipped with Windows, but once installed can be updated by WU. Only the latest .NET Framework 4.8 is shipped with Windows at this point.
206.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
OS/2 is likely where that came from - https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/21/successor_to_unix_pla...
207.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Microsoft's eye wasn't on open sourcing their OS and describing the deep internals. They still don't want you to develop against the NT API, even though developers certainly do (and Microsoft makes compatibility shims for app
208.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Better than being seen driving a Tesla Nazi car! I'd take an Edsel before being caught dead in a bootlicking Teslamobile. I mean, Tesla build quality is hot garbage regardless. They're frankly boring cars with awful UX.
209.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
Oh right, this must exclude all of the accidents where FSD cut off ~1 second before impact.
210.
▲
by
p_ing
8mo ago
It's a joke and a poke that macOS isn't certified UNIX as shipped.
More ›