oytis

12 ms·

211.
by oytis 7mo ago
What expects you on the top? Some kind of agentic rapture?
212.
by oytis 7mo ago
Open-source maintainers have no investors to placate, no competition to outrun, why would they want to use agentic coding in the first place?
213.
by oytis 7mo ago
How to differentiate between a drive-by contribution and a first contribution from a potentially long-time contrubutor. And I would say especially for operating systems if it gets any adoption irregular contributions are pretty legit. E.g.
214.
by oytis 7mo ago
Don't ask don't tell looks like a reasonable policy. If no one can tell that your code was written by an LLM and you claim authorship, then whether you have actually written it is a matter of your conscience.
215.
by oytis 7mo ago
That's eliminating of an important part of open source culture.
216.
by oytis 7mo ago
Who reviews the correctness of the second agents' review?
217.
by oytis 7mo ago
Yeah, I would call both CDU and SPD conservatives, SPD is just a left-conservative with a focus on labour rights. CDU is a bigger problem though, because their voter base is more loyal, and the only way their voters are going to migrate if
218.
by oytis 7mo ago
> It's not as simple as 100% of this is on the car manufacturers. Another big lobbyist is chemical industry. They are very reliant on gas.
219.
by oytis 7mo ago
These are very different problems from what Germany has though. And it's a recent issue, while individualism is a core tenet of American culture since independence.
220.
by oytis 7mo ago
Yeah, to me it seems that instead of fighting individualism, Germany needs to make sure that it pays off. Higher taxes for ownership, lower taxes for income from one's work for example.
221.
by oytis 7mo ago
> it's all about individualism and consumption, you can't build societies on these principles Lots of real problems listed, but such a non-sequitur conclusion. US is built on these principles, China seems to be more individuali
222.
by oytis 7mo ago
Government support for reduced working hours is also limited to 12 months
223.
by oytis 7mo ago
Depends on your position I guess. If you are a worker at a conveyor belt, it doesn't make sense to work more to produce more cars nobody needs. I think originally this policy was designed to save jobs during temporary downturns, not
224.
by oytis 7mo ago
Do not worry, the army is going downhill too
225.
by oytis 7mo ago
Such a fascinating blog post! At first I could not believe it was written in 2013. But the more I think about it, the less I understand what he is actually trying to say. Anyway, the point that we (erroneously) see less prestigious jobs as
226.
by oytis 7mo ago
> someone else We have basically 4 companies in the world one can seriously consider, and they all seem to heavily subsidise usage, so under normal market conditions not all of them are going to survive.
227.
by oytis 7mo ago
> you create an adversarial environment Do AI vendors specifically train models to circumvent AI detectors? Why would they?
228.
by oytis 8mo ago
Happy to see that the term "bullshit" has established itself in the scientific literature.
229.
by oytis 8mo ago
Please regulate our competition! Challenging our monopoly is a national security risk!
230.
by oytis 8mo ago
Chatbot log as a submission? Really?
231.
by oytis 8mo ago
Arguably, not even the pre-LLM era, enterprise sales started dominating over technical excellence some time before LLMs were invented.
232.
by oytis 8mo ago
I don't know where it goes, but it sounds pretty dumb for the companies involved too. Tech companies are in the business of nurturing teams knowledgeable in things so they can build something that gives them an advantage over competiti
233.
by oytis 8mo ago
I might still be naive about the industry, but if you don't know how the legacy codebase works, you might either delegate the change to someone else in the company who does, or, if there is no one left, use this opportunity to become t
234.
by oytis 8mo ago
> I have stopped writing code, occasionally I jump into the changes proposed by LLM and make manual edits if it is feasible, otherwise I revert changes and ask it to generate again but based on my learnings from the past rejected output
235.
by oytis 8mo ago
Everyone is mindblown in 3...2...1
236.
by oytis 8mo ago
Is it just me, or HN recently started picking up a social media dynamics with contributions reacting/responding to each other?
237.
by oytis 8mo ago
I wonder if LLMs will push the industry towards protecting their IP with patents like the other branches of engineering rather than copyright. If you patent a general idea of how your software works then no rewrite will be able to lift this
238.
by oytis 8mo ago
> That only matters if expression of the original project really does end up in the rewrite, doesn't it? No, I don't think so. I hate comparing LLMs with humans, but for a human being familiar with the original code might disqu
239.
by oytis 8mo ago
It requires the original project to not be in the training data for the model for it to be a clean room rewrite
240.
by oytis 8mo ago
Like, why have a public discussion if we can have a private one? Public discussions are important, especially as AI is largely a political project

More ›