Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
overfeed
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
631.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> Your high end hardware is not their target market / competition until you get into very purposeful tasks. Here's the kicker: it cost about the same as the highest end Macbook pro before the RAM madness. > The market segmen
632.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
Why the restriction to laptops? I don't get why prosumers would marry themselves 24/7 to a single portable device, when their conflicting requirements vary by task and circumstances: portability, high performance, low energy usage
633.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> if you explicitly ask agents to write/run tests, after a while agents just forget to do that Add a single task using your project's preferred task-runner that performs all the checks you want the agent to adhere to: linting,
634.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> Hard to share the things people use at the same time. How many TVs do you have in your living area?
635.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> When you have no workforce, you'll do no work - hell, there is just...nothing, nonexistence, no consumers either. But for a beautiful moment in time, we created a lot of value for shareholders https://www.insidehook.c
636.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> It's less a revolution and more a matter of catching the tide of shifting world powers — and seizing a rare shot at building something other than the last failed experiment The Arab spring wasn't that long ago, was it? We a
637.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> When context is 70% raw logs and snapshots, the model starts losing track of the actual task Which frontier model will (re)introduce the radical idea of separating data from executable instructions?
638.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> I can only imagine there some level of employee discontent. The rank and file mutinied for the return of Altman after his board fired him for deception. They knew what they were getting, though they may find it shameful to admit that t
639.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> That is working on the assumption that those employees are meaningfully better The assumption that people who get hired after interviewing are "better" than those who are fall off the hiring funnel underpins the entire hiring
640.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
So, is Anthropic a threat to, or indispensable to National Security? You can't have it both ways. The US used to act like a nation with the rule of law, anyone cheering for the erosion will be hit by the downstream effects sooner or la
641.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
"these days"? Too many countries/HNers are only just figuring out it's not fun being at the sharp-end of imperialism.
642.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
Attrition by definition implies no cuts: just people leaving for the usual reasons people leave, and not replacing them. Attrition can be accelerated by providing incentives like exit bonuses.
643.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
Young people love to be paid to switch jobs too - who would refuse 20 weeks of doubled income? From Squares perspective, this would lead to an adverse selection, because Square would lose the people who can easily get jobs elsewhere.
644.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> Isn't that basically the same as me giving you $80? In your accounting, you can claim that you have an investment worth $100 and book $100 worth of revenue. You're juicing your sales numbers to impress shareholders - presum
645.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
You can check for yourself, if you RTFA. Everything I said was based off of jack's post, as I quoted it. If you take issue with the non-specificity ot think he was being less than honest - take it up with jack.
646.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
I directly quoted jack - take it up with him.
647.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. I hope this gets drilled into the heads of everyone who sells their labor. The compan
648.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> BTW this likely means quite a bit of land used up by such a reservoir which is ideally never needed, but must be present This is enough to earn chemical plants a spot on a future "BANNED in California 2" article, because it&#
649.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
I understand why businesses would want to maximize work done in an area - I hope you're self-aware enough to realize this. The tension you may be blind to, is that society wants to maximize safety in an area - and any work done shoul
650.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
That's a lot of words to say business won't be driven away by regulations.
651.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> It's a collateral damage of all the (even well-intentioned, good) regulation that drives business away. I keep hearing this, but it never happens. Despite attempts to get jurisdictions to race to the bottom, businesses simply foll
652.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> I believe in procedural symmetry: if you ACTUALLY care about people and the environment, then you wouldn't let other poorer do these thing America barely cares about the domestic poor[1] - do you think its captains of industry wil
653.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
The Silicon Valley founderati is chock-full of (right wing) libertarians. I can't tell if they were always that way, or are increasingly disgruntled by state-taxes the wealthier they get.
654.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> I guess there should be an ability to do this farther from the population centers though. Maybe Texas is far enough? The [l]one-star state has laissez-faire regulations, and may be more to author's speed.
655.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
No it has not - if it had, there'd be no need to shout down folk who disagree. Not everyone buys into the inevitabilism. Why should I read code "author" didn't bother to write?
656.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
I bet every single AI-startup dude who does it thinks they've stumbled on a brilliant, original, gold-mine of an idea to use AI to shill their product/service on internet forums, or to astroturf against "AI Haters".
657.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
> But Google was at fault for not correcting their blacklist. If all it takes to be taken from the blacklist was to temporarily delete the NS record - the list would be useless against malware.
658.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
Why IPO at all, if they will release a "negligible number of shares"?
659.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
The VC likely already has ownership, and a board seat - public companies are susceptible to activist-investors and hostile bids: outsiders who hold little/no stake, but an outsized influence.
660.
▲
by
overfeed
8mo ago
Necessary - but not adequate.
More ›