ovao

40 ms·

331.
by ovao 8y ago
Prematurely axing X-Frame-Options would expose a security risk, not a “bug”, per se.
332.
by ovao 8y ago
Coils emit a relatively high-frequency sound, so your best bet is a case with thick panels, that’s fairly well enclosed, and has some acoustic dampening. Most cases made today don’t have any significant dampening material. It’s pretty tri
333.
by ovao 8y ago
One could argue that the headers comprise a very important 0.1%, but any wasted time the client spends waiting for and parsing headers will almost always be utterly dominated by the unavoidable wait for HTML parsing, JavaScript parsing, pai
334.
by ovao 8y ago
Thanks for the response! Transparency is always appreciated. It looks like the age range is a component of the plus.login scope. You’re not storing any data associated with that scope, so you can instead use the userinfo.email scope (and, p
335.
by ovao 8y ago
That doesn’t quite answer his question. Why is the age range mandatory to create an account via Google? The basic permissions — notably the ID for each user Google will hand back to you — should be sufficient for that purpose.
336.
by ovao 8y ago
I built a fanless (technically had fans, but only turned on if needed), semi-high-performance open bench-style system several years ago. It's really pretty nice in theory. The reality is that some components still emit a good bit of no
337.
by ovao 8y ago
It may register below 0dB SPL (in an anechoic chamber, anyway) depending on the manner in which it's measured, which is a complex discipline in itself. Sound pressure dissipates over distance, for example, so the distance at which the
338.
by ovao 8y ago
Jobs built his empire out of his garage. Is that not how the quintessential self-made success story usually starts?
339.
by ovao 8y ago
I don't believe it's a ploy. I think John's just doing what he feels to be the right thing given that he is — at least to the audience he writes to — a high-ranking employee of Facebook. I couldn't even tell you if he ev
340.
by ovao 8y ago
If your application requires multiple servers running multiple domains, you're probably better off with a microservice architecture.
341.
by ovao 8y ago
The overall approach to folder structure can be a personal thing, and doesn't matter too much what you settle on. My own preference is for something like: github.com/<user>/<repo> |- main.go | |- config&#
342.
by ovao 8y ago
It wasn't a serious comment.
343.
by ovao 8y ago
An interesting question, actually. Presumably very, very large.
344.
by ovao 8y ago
While not cost effective in the slightest, jettisoning nuclear waste into outer space is one proposition. Naturally, launching rockets filled with nuclear waste comes with its own safety concerns.
345.
by ovao 8y ago
I’ve actually never seen it approached any other way (triggered by a direct action), which is somehow even more obnoxious than the prompt itself.
346.
by ovao 8y ago
Sounds great! Lack of HTTP 2.0 support in hyper has been the major hang-up for me.
347.
by ovao 8y ago
Frankly I don't know if Go passes any barometer for "important". I don't think it's significantly disrupting any particular space, so if that's the measure of a language's importance, I don't think Go
348.
by ovao 8y ago
It also spends money developing genuinely unencumbered programming languages that are, in general fact, quite pleasant. Google can make money in one way and still provide real value in others, and that’s what they (and all of Go’s contribut
349.
by ovao 8y ago
If the Rust ecosystem was up to snuff on the HTTP front, I'd be writing a lot more of it. At the moment, Go's HTTP implementation is just pretty much unbeatable. I'm confident it'll get there — and there's a ton of
350.
by ovao 8y ago
Interesting work. In general, how does it perform compared to LMDB, BoltDB, Badger, etc.? What kind of performance increases would you expect from the optimizations you didn't get around to?
351.
by ovao 8y ago
The post doesn’t go into much detail about how the new i128 and u128 types are implemented, so for anyone who’s as curious as I was, the RFC is here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text&#x2
352.
by ovao 8y ago
I'm sorry, but we can't have a productive discussion if you're simply going to mischaracterize what I've said and make false assertions as to what my own beliefs are. I've been cordial to this point, but if cordiali
353.
by ovao 8y ago
We can still try to hold ISPs accountable for lying (or even misrepresenting) to elected officials, which is what the EFF is attempting to do.
354.
by ovao 8y ago
I believe users should have control of their data. I don’t have any issue with the GDPR in that respect, and that’s not what I’ve taken issue with. When you say “no thanks”, that’s a user exercising control over their data, and is an acti
355.
by ovao 8y ago
Can you give me an example of someone who isn’t in a position to — in simple terms — take their business elsewhere when it comes to dealing with some sort of online company with whom they’re voluntarily sharing data?
356.
by ovao 8y ago
Either we’re not talking about the same thing, or I don’t quite understand how your comment relates to mine. I really can’t answer your question.
357.
by ovao 8y ago
Given that a significant component to the determination of interest rates is risk, I don’t think one could reasonably expect a non-public system of lending to operate any other way. We’re getting pretty off-topic though, so if you’d like to
358.
by ovao 8y ago
I think the issue is that it really hasn't been a "take it or leave it" environment in the past years. Things have been done against the interest of user privacy by burying the explanations in long privacy policies filled w
359.
by ovao 8y ago
Sorry if it wasn't clear. I'm suggesting that a business should have some right to deny service to a user who chooses not to participate in tracking, so long as it's made abundantly and plainly clear to said user that they&#x
360.
by ovao 8y ago
I'm not referring to Facebook specifically. The dialog that Facebook's displaying to EU users (according to the tweet) isn't actually very clear in itself about what they're asking users for. "Clear consent", i

More ›