oulipo2

4 ms·

31.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Not sure why I would put another software to check that the agent doesn't do "SQL writes", rather than providing them... with a read-only account? It looks like those projects are trying to reinvent service-accounts and permi
32.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
I agree. In Europe we're particularly lucky that, after only a few hours in a train, we can be in a totally different culture, speaking a different language. But even without this, traveling in the country side, getting to learn the hi
33.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Except those "organic pesticide" are largely NOT used in modern organic farming, and when they are, they're used at a much lower level than "conventional pesticides"
34.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Exactly. The OP article is pure nonsense
35.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
There are studies in France that showed it. It's been widely discussed here because of the opposition of the population to the pro-pesticide agro-industrial lobbies.
36.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Exactly. The OP article is nonsense
37.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
That's completely false. It's been proven that, even though they aren't always entirely pesticide free because of pesticide remaining in soil / water / nearby fields that have been spread, their levels are much lowe
38.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Sure, but that's how Governments worked for decades before widespread access to laptops / mobile phones...
39.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
If it's a government employee (as it should), it shouldn't be open to fraud and abuse, no. There should be a trail of what happened
40.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Totally agree, gov pages should be widely accessible. Also gov services should NEVER mandate internet access. There should always be a way for tech-illiterate people to ask someone, and fill their forms
41.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
I think that creativity / intelligence / humour is indissociable from "making errors". A joke is just an "error" - your brain predicted something, and the butt of the joke goes in another direction, and it&#x27
42.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
how does that compare to something like, eg, Orbstack?
43.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
That's not the point of OP. The point of OP is that Google is a direct competitor of Apple for phones / OS, so them giving the "key of the house" to Google is risky
44.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
You won't. Because 80% of the complexity is just "knowing what to build". You will get something that gives you a prototype in 1 min, then you break it, then you get a slightly better prototype one one side, but newly broken
45.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Are you saying that because you recognize that Musk IS trapped in addictions (coke and MDMA), has severe mental health issues (depression and delusion) ?
46.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
You can still build such great visions: - by doing it through governments (that's how we went to the moon, BTW) - by having a collection of smaller companies cooperating and acting together
47.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Exactly. That's a way to force their wealth to become productive or to disappear
48.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Who cares about the stock price. They should be forced to split their companies in smaller, competing companies, so that: 1. there's not a huge asshole controlling enormous companies (and then also buying all the media and ruining the
49.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Yet he has the shittiest possible life, forced to be scared of someone harming him, all his children in age of understanding who he is hates him, same for his ex-wives, most hated person in the world after Putin and Trump
50.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
also a few different para-sql languages that can be useful, to lower the complexity: - https://prql-lang.org/ - https://www.malloydata.dev/
51.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
PRQL, or https://www.malloydata.dev/
52.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
I didn't know the term, but I'll look it up, thanks! :)
53.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
I believe everything is conscious, even stones. On the long timescale, stones decay, their hydrogen is released, they form water, which brings life, which brings plants and animals, but all of this is one big process, and everything is infu
54.
by oulipo2 4mo ago
Article reeks of having been written by ChatGPT
55.
by oulipo2 5mo ago
So then, why change the rules?
56.
by oulipo2 5mo ago
I don't think the AI criticism has anything to do with "thinking we are beyond nature or whatever". It's the realization that this force will only drive societies apart even more Noticed how the proponents of AI are the
57.
by oulipo2 5mo ago
If you think that people working in tech shouldn't be capable of criticizing their own domain, and taking a step back to understand what they're helping build, I can't do much for you
58.
by oulipo2 5mo ago
Then they just lack the realization or understanding that in a capitalistic society, the ONLY possible use for AI is surveillance
59.
by oulipo2 5mo ago
They lack the understanding that technology is not separate from society. Both go together, and CANNOT be analyzed without each other. People who did engineering studies often think that "tech is pure", it's a simple "kn
60.
by oulipo2 5mo ago
Exactly. Each time you criticize the techno-fascist system that props up AI here, people downvote blindly without even trying to understand why authoritarian regimes love surveillance technologies like AI allows

More ›