otterley

19 ms·

481.
by otterley 4mo ago
"Slightly immature." You make it sound like his biggest sin is farting in an elevator and laughing about it. Would you tolerate the sort of behavior Musk exhibits from your own children? (I'm assuming you are fully aware of a
482.
by otterley 4mo ago
You don’t have to pay if you stop using the feature. This is a huge nothing-burger.
483.
by otterley 4mo ago
The BSD license (which is the one at issue here) does not explicitly permit the licensee to change the license terms of covered software upon redistribution. Perhaps it would be permitted under an expansive interpretation, but under a narro
484.
by otterley 4mo ago
I would agree with you but for the author’s attempt to publish it under a new license. I think they can either claim it’s a new work (in which case it’s public domain) or claim it’s a derivative work (in which case I don’t think they can ch
485.
by otterley 4mo ago
I’m not sure it’s so easily severable in this case.
486.
by otterley 4mo ago
A comic book is a physical object. This analogy doesn’t hold. When you give a comic book to someone, you’re only transferring the copy and its implied license that carries with it. You can set the terms of the physical object, but you can’t
487.
by otterley 4mo ago
IAAL (not legal advice) and I’m not sure the issue is settled. The BSD license only explicitly permits the author “to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written
488.
by otterley 4mo ago
You might be right, if it is a derivative work and not a new one. There’s some evidence that the authors consider it a new one because they’re attempting to change its license. The BSD license doesn’t explicitly convey the right to create
489.
by otterley 4mo ago
If this software was written by a mechanical process, the license is a nullity. It’s public domain.
490.
by otterley 4mo ago
I’ll interpret this circular answer as “no impact whatsoever upon me personally, or upon society in a way that I can concretely identify.” This argument seems to otherwise come down to “people are adding nuance to a word that I believe to b
491.
by otterley 4mo ago
I thought we were talking about what LLMs and people say, not something the Government is doing. You don’t have to agree with either of them. I’m still very curious as to what concrete—not theoretical—impact the issue of gender attribution
492.
by otterley 4mo ago
“Terrifying”? Really? What frightening consequences do you believe will result? What will the impact be to society—and to you personally—if some LLM happens to say this?
493.
by otterley 4mo ago
By that logic, any reduction in punishment for a crime is "pro crime." On the contrary, reducing the maximum fine for speeding is not "pro speeding," and eliminating the death penalty for murder is not "pro murder.&
494.
by otterley 4mo ago
It is possible to be known for both.
495.
by otterley 4mo ago
Most of the world would beg to differ!
496.
by otterley 4mo ago
It boggles my mind that people are still dying on this silly hill.
497.
by otterley 4mo ago
It was a comedic naming. You might be taking things too seriously.
498.
by otterley 4mo ago
I think you're watching the news too much, or are perhaps paying too much attention to how the right characterizes the left. It distorts reality. Time to touch grass. People on the left aren't generally against ICE and immigration
499.
by otterley 4mo ago
Not wanting to be affiliated with Elon Musk or his business enterprises is not "derangement."
500.
by otterley 4mo ago
These are not left-wing values. You're being incredibly reductive. Only a few nut jobs at the far left wing support some of these things, and even then, not all of them. Nobody is "for" crime.
501.
by otterley 4mo ago
This paragraph makes no sense whatsoever.
502.
by otterley 4mo ago
Reality has a well-known liberal bias.
503.
by otterley 4mo ago
You keep saying you'll provide specifics, but I haven't seen anything. Instead of saying you'll provide them, actually provide them! Be forthcoming. This conversation feels like the "disturbance in the kitchen" scen
504.
by otterley 4mo ago
Despite the references to recent cases like Carpenter , this isn’t a cogent legal analysis. These recent cases have been focused on the question as to whether law enforcement activity involving cameras, cell phone locations, etc. constitut
505.
by otterley 4mo ago
Ignored, or just unaware? Perhaps you could reach out to the author and point them to such writers.
506.
by otterley 4mo ago
There’s no S3 bandwidth bill for traffic to and from EC2 in the same region.
507.
by otterley 4mo ago
> Then he knowingly blew it all up overnight to ally with Trump. He blew it up years before that with his "pedo guy" false accusation drama.
508.
by otterley 4mo ago
I think this is also a good lesson on why it's best to isolate mission-critical services like databases on their own compute nodes.
509.
by otterley 4mo ago
Oh? Why not? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001
510.
by otterley 4mo ago
The Copyright Office hasn’t changed its analysis, and courts will likely defer to it when they’re asked to settle a dispute about it.

More ›