otterley

11 ms·

271.
by otterley 2mo ago
That’s why you ship the logs off host to a central collector.
272.
by otterley 2mo ago
> syslog experience? very efficient also on heavy load production instances, never lost a log, You’re lucky. The original syslog protocol was fire-and-forget UDP (which I believe is still the default, though it’s been ages and I could be
273.
by otterley 2mo ago
The syslog architecture never had a filter component in the middle that could drop logs before they reached syslogd.
274.
by otterley 2mo ago
systemd was funded and implemented by the biggest commercial distro, Red Hat, first. Other distros were influenced by its decision (RH has always had a lot of influence on distro direction generally) and followed suit. I’m not sure Red Hat
275.
by otterley 2mo ago
This design predates the IBM acquisition by seven years.
276.
by otterley 2mo ago
My interpretation of what they said is that it’s dangerous to make the assumption that the 4th Amendment will cause the exclusion of evidence yielded by ALPRs if the question is adjudicated today, based on current law. I agree with this, an
277.
by otterley 2mo ago
That “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard is just the first step of the analysis and goes into the threshold question of “is this a search?” Because if the answer is “no,” then there’s nothing more to be done, not a search, no warra
278.
by otterley 2mo ago
> It's actually far more dangerous to presume we are already protected (your position) particularly based on reading tea leaves in flimsy ancillary opinions when the Court has shown itself fully happy to blow precedent out of the wa
279.
by otterley 2mo ago
You’re citing that concurrence again. While that concurrence supports your argument, it’s not binding legal precedent. Perhaps someday it will be, but not today.
280.
by otterley 2mo ago
Probably because the overall impact is not as bad as extremely vocal people on GitHub and HN would have you believe, and more people like systemd than dislike it.
281.
by otterley 2mo ago
Not if you use the correct cache hint flags on the write.
282.
by otterley 2mo ago
> that is unlikely to be the full story at the end of the day since it is a fishing expedition at the moment. This suit, assuming it's like most shareholder derivative "failure to disclose material information which led to a st
283.
by otterley 2mo ago
Indeed. It also means "don't come to me with problems alone ." Yes, one can come with a problem, but the exhortation is to come with possible solutions as well and seek guidance on which one is best.
284.
by otterley 2mo ago
You may be confusing me with estearum. I'm just adding data to the discussion. I did say earlier, though: > although the "plain view" doctrine has been weakened somewhat over the last couple decades, it's not complete
285.
by otterley 2mo ago
fluidcruft is not wrong about this particular point. And even if they were, while you may disagree passionately with the state of the law today, that doesn't give you the right to be a dick to them about their analysis. Knock it off.
286.
by otterley 2mo ago
The Supreme Court has already held in three cases that air surveillance, even from an altitude as low as 400 feet, does not constitute a search: California v. Ciraolo (1986), Dow Chemical Co. v. United States (1986), and Florida v. Riley (1
287.
by otterley 2mo ago
> That's what I did Please explain, because it's not coming across that way. It's coming across as needlessly picky and combative, especially after I told you what I meant (or, at least, didn't mean) and you continued
288.
by otterley 2mo ago
That would make for a fun experiment for a syslog service. I encourage anyone who wants to give it a shot!
289.
by otterley 2mo ago
Well, I didn't intend to suggest an obligation, more of a best practice or challenge. Please put more faith in my intentions over whatever interpretation of my words you want to make. Per our Guidelines: > Please respond to the stro
290.
by otterley 2mo ago
> Anyone with any sort of scale where you actually need indexing immediately drops journald and uses loki or elasticsearch instead. Journald is not even remotely a contender in that space. That I agree with. I don't personally use j
291.
by otterley 2mo ago
The difference between grep/ripgrep and querying by field is the difference between a full table scan and an index query. Query performance is a very good reason to have databases. ripgrep is certainly fast, but it's still O(N). D
292.
by otterley 2mo ago
Cite a case, statute, or legal commentary, please.
293.
by otterley 2mo ago
Is that true even with PRAGMA journal_mode = WAL? https://www.sqlite.org/wal.html
294.
by otterley 2mo ago
It feels like you didn't read the design rationale, because the use cases and issues are listed therein. Maybe you don't see the value, but that doesn't mean it's not there for others. I certainly find its query featur
295.
by otterley 2mo ago
Nobody's talking about an obligation here. It's open source, and the maintainer owes non-paying users nothing. So if you want something fixed, it's now easier than ever to get involved in the fix. Nothing more, nothing less.
296.
by otterley 2mo ago
> we may even know what part of their break-even calculations CDN costs are in the future. That's unlikely to come out publicly as a result of this suit. Courts routinely grant motions to seal records that contain trade secrets.
297.
by otterley 2mo ago
> I'm probably the main person responsible for making journald usable at all. Thank you for your service!
298.
by otterley 2mo ago
> This is a huge issue for btrfs and for COW FS in general, because they have massive write amplification for small and frequent writes Have you considered using a different fstype like XFS for this? btrfs is good for homedirs, but I wou
299.
by otterley 2mo ago
The mailing list archives are here: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/ It doesn't look like there was an open design review; Lennart Poettering just dropped it in in v38. https:/&#x2F
300.
by otterley 2mo ago
Something must have happened along the way, because this was not the original design intent of the database (emphasis mine): """ The native journal file format is inspired by classic log files as well as git repositories. It

More ›