otterdude

6 ms·

31.
by otterdude 9mo ago
If you're sharing the IP that harms the credibility in the first place for an established system.
32.
by otterdude 9mo ago
The 65K IP addresses cost 1.638M dollars, thats alot more than they would spend doing the exact same thing today. The idea is to accept bad actors but make it more expensive and also you can directly identify cliques by IP ect.
33.
by otterdude 9mo ago
I think residential proxy IP's still have the same associated cost, and arent those often for bundled traffic? I'm not much of a blackhat so excuse my lack of knowledge on tricks of the trade
34.
by otterdude 10mo ago
256 Processes x 10k clients (per the article) = 256K RPS
35.
by otterdude 10mo ago
When people talk about a single server they're not talking about one hunk of metal, they're talking about 1 server process. This article describes the 10k client connection problem, you should be handling 256K clients :)
36.
by otterdude 11mo ago
did you forget up is down and down is up?
37.
by otterdude 11mo ago
First off you should get a better, less douchy domain provider than GoDaddy. I like namecheap. You're better off just dumping them and changing domains don't put up with this kind of BS. You could try suing them but they'd pr
38.
by otterdude 11mo ago
"We're not just reselling Postgres. We're trying to create something both novel and foundational at the same time. It's not easy!"
39.
by otterdude 11mo ago
No but i think you get more accountability and visibility. Right now we could never do this but in a functioning democracy I think it would be prudent. In civil law when there is no clear precedent congress gets involved preventing the kind
40.
by otterdude 11mo ago
I would like to see the law defining that!
41.
by otterdude 11mo ago
My argument is created to test the original "corporations are people" legality in common law. - slavery, the owning of people, is prohibited by the 13th amendment. - the law of the land is that corporations are a type of legal pe
42.
by otterdude 11mo ago
My point is the benefit greatly from the distinction, never codified in law. They have more rights and fewer responsibilities than actual people! They way it "should" be is that congress creates a legal framework for coporations,
43.
by otterdude 11mo ago
My arguments are as bad-faith as the arguments that lead to corporate personhood and citizens united. Fight fire with fire.
44.
by otterdude 11mo ago
I guess my larger point is that words are manipulated to get to a desired effect in the justice system. Slavery is defined as the practice of owning a "person" which the 13th amendment prohibits. As corporations are people why cou
45.
by otterdude 11mo ago
The answer if for congress to make a legal definition of corporation, instead we get the justice system coming up with a handwavy explanation that helps out their golfing buddies. The answer is to get rid of the common law justice system an
46.
by otterdude 11mo ago
The definition for person is "a living human". This argument is just ridiculous, a corporation is a corporation. That contains subsets of people who have rights (shareholders, employees).
47.
by otterdude 11mo ago
The problem is judges, especially in a common law system. Computers follow the machine code PERFECTLY. For the legal system judges get to embark on a jazz odyssey of bullshit. Were living in an easy to track, decades long legal conspiracy t
48.
by otterdude 11mo ago
Its just not logical to argue, either they are or they arent. For instance, corporations can be bought or sold, but people cannot per the 13th amendment. Help me understand how these inconsistent principles are allowed in the supposedly rig
49.
by otterdude 11mo ago
I am continually baffled by the "logic" behind laws and the justice system. If corporations are people, then how can they be bought or sold considering the 13th amendment? How can money be speech, if the constitution allows congre
50.
by otterdude 1y ago
All I'm saying Its a complete 360 from the marketing they did to establish their brand... you know, save the world kind of stuff, especially from google. From 2000-2016 most tech marketing\branding was aimed at some kind of social bene
51.
by otterdude 1y ago
What Amazon, Azure, and Google are showing with their platform crashes amid layoffs, while they supports governments that are Oppressing's Citizens and Ignoring the Law, is that they do not care about anything other than the bottom lin
52.
by otterdude 1y ago
naw dude we gotta get these quarters numbers up by degrading quality on windows/chromecast. It just reeks of incompetence and insincerity
53.
by otterdude 1y ago
Also, that reputation was earned before 2010 when every asshole jumped into "technology" for the fat paycheck. It used to be hard and a liability to be a nerd
54.
by otterdude 1y ago
Facebook, Twitter and Instagram all took advantage of "viral marketing", ontop of lots of venture funding for advertising potential. Distributed/P2P tech is essential because of the income from marketing maintains these syste
55.
by otterdude 1y ago
All those out of work programmers here's an opprotunity to create some disruption, pad your resume, and possibly create a job. While we still have a free internet, it would be great to see efforts to create technology to replace centra
56.
by otterdude 1y ago
Apple is the new dogshit. Having serious issues with nearly every one of their offerings. Apple TV app needs to be logged in every time. iTunes plays video/audio out of sync. hardware failures on macbook pro / apple watch. I'
57.
by otterdude 1y ago
until people starting giving a shit to form alternatives, they're the only option that exists. Were not in a college classroom debating ideals, this is a real life triage situation
58.
by otterdude 1y ago
You're completely right, the supremacy of the legal domain over the scientific i think is ultimately to blame. We need specialized courts for technological matters instead of letting seniors who can't even open their email make th
59.
by otterdude 1y ago
I believe you're analysis is ultimately correct, but we wont fix things by staying silent. We should be building technology and organizing to fight this BS
60.
Ex-Mar-a-Lago employee granted broad AI search patent (US12,277,125) – thoughts? [pdf](patentimages.storage.googleapis.com)
9 points by otterdude 1y ago|6 comments

More ›