othmanosx

7 ms·

61.
by othmanosx 3mo ago
Human reviews do still matter a lot. our goal is to speed this up, not replace it completely with AI reviews. I think AI should complement the human review, not replace it, and I think everyone already agrees with me on this. The problem wi
62.
by othmanosx 3mo ago
I still believe that I can write better code compared to what the AI can produce. But is it really... cost-effective? Probably not.
63.
by othmanosx 3mo ago
Human reviews do still matter a lot. our goal is to speed this up, not replace it completely with AI reviews. I think AI should complement the human review, not replace it, and I think everyone already agrees with me on this. The problem wi
64.
by othmanosx 3mo ago
I think AI should complement the human review, not replace it, and I think everyone already agrees with me on this. The problem with AI reviews, is that they add a lot more text to read, the PR description is another wall of text, test step
65.
I'm opening VSCode less and less every day
21 points by othmanosx 3mo ago|23 comments
66.
by othmanosx 3mo ago
That's how I review code nowadays: 1. Start an AI review. 2. Test the app myself, note any bugs or visual issues. 3. Review the code on www.pyor.review, compared to Github, Pyor allows me to categorize the files and changes then review
67.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
Arabic is so dense, and Quran came to perfect it. Reading the following verse from Quran, makes me proud that I'm a native Arabic speaker: "إِنَّا أَنزَلْنَاهُ قُرْآنًا عَرَبِيًّا لَّعَلَّكُمْ تَعْقِلُونَ" "Indeed, We ha
68.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
Good read, and I can relate to it. Agents tend to be great at the mechanical pass or the review, style or obvious bugs or missing tests, the part that already had linters, the part that doesn't delegate is intent, "Does this chang
69.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
We already are using software that is ancient, with many vulnerabilities that are already in the public, we already use insecure software more than we care to admit, if Mythos is gonna help with that, it's gonna make finding (not disco
70.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
Thanks!
71.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
With the increase of work with AI tools, I see myself using work trees a hell of a lot more compared to before the AI agents. And I think having too many work trees in a single repo is just choking VS Code. As it's not really built for
72.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
I tried Zed too. It's really performant and all, but I feel like I got used to VS Code too much and even looking at a different themed editor feels... awkward. Extensions is a must for me. I have plenty of extensions and I think Zed wo
73.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
What else would you use instead of VS Code?
74.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
I'm curious to know how you got yourself into such a situation.
75.
Show HN: Hatchr – Share Claude Designs with a public link(hatchr.link)
1 points by othmanosx 4mo ago|0 comments
76.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
looks nice! trying the build the same thing in a web+desktop app format pyor.review
77.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
I kinda got this feeling when I saw that button in the upper right corner, clicking it transforms VSCode from a code editor to a Claude/Codex clone.
78.
I feel like VSCode is falling apart
16 points by othmanosx 4mo ago|19 comments
79.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
>"Low-risk, well-covered changes can flow through automated gates without waiting for ritual approval. A utility function with 95% test coverage and no security findings does not require the same scrutiny as a change to your authent
80.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
Crazy that on one hand Fable is getting banned for being too good at finding security holes while there are other models that can probably do the same while running locally on your machine like GLM. No one's going to ban you from using
81.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
https://www.pyor.review
82.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
What about gaming on a mac?
83.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
You still have to read the code anyways. the output is also on you. AI is just shifting the bottleneck. we're now shipping code 10X faster, but still reviewing code like we always do. I'm working on a solution for the latter now.
84.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
Well... I guess squiggly lines are more useful now than ever with agents shipping tons of code every day
85.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
Just run the /insights command on your Claude and see what it gives you, you'd be shocked what it knows about you just talking to it.
86.
Show HN: Pyor – A desktop PR reviewer for the diffs GitHub chokes on
4 points by othmanosx 4mo ago|2 comments
87.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
Looks cool, goes into flames when I tick a few more things
88.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
Virtualization missing, that's commonly a difficult task to nail on a messages list. another thing is mounting and unmounting complex elements efficiently, that was part of why switching threads or sessions felt heavy. btw, native apps
89.
by othmanosx 4mo ago
That's why they have an "auto" mode that you should be using over the "bypass permissions". no matter how many guardrails you put on it. AI is not deterministic, so sometimes it likes to do whatever it wants.
90.
Why are pull requests so hard to review?(pyor.review)
2 points by othmanosx 4mo ago|0 comments

More ›