osoba

8 ms·

31.
by osoba 11y ago
The text looks readable but the formulas are missing pieces since the TeX fonts arent loaded. Printing to PDF worked for me
32.
by osoba 11y ago
That worked. Thanks
33.
by osoba 11y ago
Does anybody know how to make the book actually readable? http://i.imgur.com/C4rhclk.png
34.
by osoba 11y ago
Could you name a specific course you found too difficult to complete? My experience was the exact opposite - most Udacity courses seemed (disappointingly) lightweight. I remember taking their Object-Oriented JavaScript course, which is mark
35.
by osoba 11y ago
I thought multicellularity on Earth evolved independently around 50 times? So it does kind of make sense that it would be the result of something as simple as a single SNP that changes a function of a protein from whatever to binding to pro
36.
by osoba 11y ago
It's fixed now. Thanks
37.
by osoba 11y ago
Could you move the puzzle on amazon a few (20?) pixels to the right, the. (.)(.)(.)(.)\4\3\2\1. regex gets cut off on the left when you rotate http://i.imgur.com/qcG1kav.png
38.
by osoba 11y ago
This is just out of the top of my head so could be wrong but isnt't there a simple analytic solution by using Riemann sums: Pick any point in the intersection A (can be on border too). Divide the interval from 0 to 2pi into many small
39.
by osoba 12y ago
Hmm ok Thanks for actually testing it
40.
by osoba 12y ago
Oh yeah you're right Although, wouldn't variable overflow be the case for any algorithm, since already the 100th or so Fibonacci number takes more space than 2^64 And if you were to use the full float precision of sqr5 (and not ju
41.
by osoba 12y ago
There is, actually, an even simpler formula. While the explicit formula for the n-th Fibbonacci number is indeed F_n = 1/sqrt5 * [ ((1+sqrt5)/2)^n - ((1-sqrt5)/2)^n ] or F_n = (1.6180^n + 0.6180^n)/2.2361 you can notice
42.
by osoba 12y ago
I will try to list resources in a linear fashion, in a way that one naturally adds onto the previous (in terms of knowledge) [PREREQUISITES] First things first, I assume you went to a highschool, so you don't have a need for a full pre
43.
by osoba 12y ago
The one big positive side to MOOCs is that they offer breadth (even if it's somewhat watered down). My own real life academic curriculum is 90% pure math, with programming and theoretical physics covering the other 10%, and having a wi
44.
by osoba 12y ago
Part 1 is mostly about permeability of the neuronal cell membrane to the various ions, the equation that governs this (the Nernst equation), and the way that the concentrations and charge of these ions interplay to create a neural impulse,
45.
by osoba 12y ago
I took this course (part 1 of 3) last year and passed it with about 90%. It left me with a question in the back of my mind about whether this is a very watered down version of the actual Harvard course (I hope it isn't) or if they&#x27
46.
Somebody Googled something before it was discovered? - You found a time traveler(sciencenews.org)
2 points by osoba 13y ago|0 comments