orf

8 ms·

121.
by orf 7mo ago
https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/tree/main/Library/Homebrew/... for reference
122.
by orf 7mo ago
i'm guessing it's accounts they have compromised with the stealer.
123.
by orf 7mo ago
It’s only 2 characters - if you use it all the time it becomes muscle memory.
124.
by orf 7mo ago
What’s the point of posting vacuous AI comments here?
125.
by orf 7mo ago
Back office, employee access is a completely different problem to what is described in the post. How do you enforce tenant isolation with that method, or prevent unbounded table reads?
126.
by orf 7mo ago
I mean just use them and compare, the gap is obvious.
127.
by orf 7mo ago
No it’s not?
128.
by orf 7mo ago
Good, Jetbrains desperately need to focus. I love their offerings, but I can see their value rapidly evaporating as Claude code/agents eats their lunch. Meanwhile you can’t open a project’s git worktree without requiring a full and com
129.
by orf 7mo ago
> Fact is that most of the world already gets by with a fraction of the economic data we produce In terms of absolute number of countries, maybe, but is this accurate out of comparable peer countries?
130.
by orf 7mo ago
It’s exactly the same as A/B testing an interface. This is just testing 4 variants of a “page” (the plan), measuring how many people pressed “continue”.
131.
by orf 7mo ago
Think terraform tests, temporary environments, etc. Or anything else: it’s Hyrum's Law.
132.
by orf 7mo ago
That would be a huge breaking change. Any workload that relies on re-using a bucket name would be broken, and at the scale of S3 that would have a non-trivial customer impact. Not to mention the ergonomics would suck - suddenly your terrafo
133.
by orf 7mo ago
Damn, make sure to email Dario and let him know they need to destroy their model entirely
134.
by orf 7mo ago
You’d send me a contributor agreement, after I’ve contributed, to retroactively ask if I used a LLM to write the code, and if I refused you’d then sue me for nebulous ill-defined damages and for breaching a non-existent contract? So in your
135.
by orf 7mo ago
[flagged]
136.
by orf 7mo ago
[flagged]
137.
by orf 7mo ago
[flagged]
138.
by orf 7mo ago
It’s an abstract argument with one pretty clear point that you can’t seem to grasp: people lie, on the internet, all the time. Any system, policy or discussion that pretends this isn’t the case is worthless.
139.
by orf 7mo ago
I couldn’t find anything when I searched for “UK police task force tasked with ensuring people don’t lie on GitHub” could you help me with that thanks
140.
by orf 7mo ago
I’m really struggling to understand why you think any of this means anything? Why would I sign it as my real name? Does the DCO require ID verification? No? So it would be “Mr Ima Dog”. People can lie in the internet, saying “oh but no they
141.
by orf 7mo ago
> At that point you've proven intention, meaning you'll get the chance to argue your viewpoint in front of a judge. Sure, put out an international search warrant for xXImADogOnTheInternet86Xx.
142.
by orf 7mo ago
> what else are you going to lie about? Nothing? Everything? Does it fucking matter? Assigning trust across a boundary like this is stupid, and that’s my point. Oh, would you just accept my blatantly, verbatim copied-from-another-codebas
143.
by orf 7mo ago
Never? That would be tax avoidance and theft, both crimes.
144.
by orf 7mo ago
What a reductive argument. Is this your first day on planet earth? If so, here’s what you need to know: - people can just say things - when people say things, you don’t have to listen to them - not listening to them doesn’t make you superio
145.
by orf 7mo ago
Their boundaries. If they don’t want to accept the code, cool. Nobody is forcing them to, and I respect that. But if they can’t enforce their boundaries, because they can’t tell the difference between AI code and non-AI code witho
146.
by orf 7mo ago
No, just a normal reaction to someone trying to force their beliefs on you.
147.
by orf 7mo ago
They are asking me to author my contributions in a way that they approve of. The essence of the request is the same as asking someone to author them whilst standing on their head. Except they don’t, won’t and can’t control that: the v
148.
by orf 7mo ago
Sure, but back in reality no you’re not? No more than any other contributor? If I want to use an auto-complete then I can, and I will? Restricting that is as regressive as a project trying to specify that I write code from a specific countr
149.
by orf 7mo ago
https://www.google.com/search?q=is+fidonet+alive+today https://www.google.com/search?q=is+fidonet+archived+anywhere
150.
by orf 7mo ago
just like... don't tell them a LLM did it?

More ›