order-matters

10 ms·

121.
by order-matters 10mo ago
I think it's related. The nature of the wage work likely also self-selects for people who simply enjoy coding and being removed from the bigger picture problems they are solving. Im on the side of only enjoy coding to solve problems a
122.
by order-matters 10mo ago
I wonder if DRY is still a principle worth holding onto in the AI coding era. I mean it probably is, but this feels like enough of a shift in coding design that re-evaluating principles designed for human-only coding might be worth the eff
123.
by order-matters 10mo ago
TBH I think its ability to structure unstructured data is what makes it a powerhouse tool and there is so much juice to squeeze there that we can make process improvements for years even if it doesnt get any better at general intelligence.
124.
by order-matters 10mo ago
I would argue I am never required to accept someone elses version of ethics, but the laws do have to agree to some sort of consensus. Generally i think we do a pretty good job with allowing people to adhere to their personal ethics without
125.
by order-matters 11mo ago
no it really isnt. the value of crypto as it relates to FIAT is in trading volume over time, and it does not mean anyone needs to be a fool left holding the bag unless the trading volume decreases and doesnt return. I want to buy something
126.
by order-matters 11mo ago
In addition to the other comment about perishables, storage space is another meaningful limiting factor that can vary with income level. Both the raw volume of available storage and the quality of the storage on things like temperature con
127.
by order-matters 11mo ago
Right so then it is a matter of convenience disguised as an ethical problem. because they still arent boycotting the unethical processes effecting other people (by the same line of ethics that makes AI unethical in their view), just the on
128.
by order-matters 11mo ago
I get that, it's just not the proper way to deliver justice and imo is unethical if the item you are boycotting has the ability to improve people's lives. Whether AI is at the level where we should consider not using it to be unet
129.
by order-matters 11mo ago
I'll admit I did not have something specific in mind for how to disperse with the IP/Profits, that would be open for discussion. the main point would just be that the party breaking ethical standards is held accountable and it ca
130.
by order-matters 11mo ago
>Yes, but since you are out of business you no longer have an opportunity to fix that situation or adapt it to your morals. It's final. Lots of room for nuance here, but generally Id say its more pragmatic to pivot your business to
131.
by order-matters 11mo ago
Yes, actually - being right and out of business is much better than being wrong and in business when it comes to ethics and morals. I am sure you could find a lot of moral values you would simply refuse to compromise on for the sake of bus