Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
opo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
241.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>It doesn't replace getting real sunlight though. Or if you're an Inuit, eating polar bear livers. Not that I expect HN readers to likely end up in a situation where they have to decide whether to eat a polar bear liver, but th
242.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
Wilson was also very racist: >...While Wilson's tenure is often noted for progressive achievement, his time in office was one of unprecedented regression in regard to racial equality.[1] He removed most federal officeholders who wer
243.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
Before all these price gouging laws, in natural disasters there used to be marginal producers (people with a pickup truck etc.) who would load up on some supplies like ice etc. and bring them to the area that was hit to make a quick profit.
244.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>I see this argument made more and more, as all the other arguments against solar are proved beyond doubt to have been total nonsense. I see this logical fallacy made more and more where people start out by begging the question. No need
245.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>You are positing a zero-sum game between utility solar and rooftop solar. Consumer rooftop solar is the most expensive way ever thought of to provide electrical power. Money is fungible. A dollar tied up in building a one-off consumer
246.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>Utility solar just means the utility company can soak up more profits. Utilities are generally considered natural monopolies and their rates are regulated. If there are higher costs because they have to literally buy power at the retail
247.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
Solar energy comes up often on HN, but it is misleading to talk about solar without differentiating between utility grid solar and consumer rooftop solar. Simply put, utility grid solar provides low cost power and consumer rooftop solar do
248.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
The podcast 99% Invisible did a good podcast covering the Red Car. From their overview article on the episode: >...Henry Huntington took his money and headed for Los Angeles. He purchased the biggest transportation system in the city, th
249.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
This does likely include roof mounted residential solar. >Most solar in a solar-powered world will be on the ground. It is probably more accurate to say that most solar in a solar-powered world should be on the ground. The reality is th
250.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>Reagan took the solar panels off the White House for a reason, so his buddy James Watt could kill off any alternatives to fossil energy. The panels installed on the White House were not photovoltaic solar panels - they were solar water
251.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
In many jurisdictions, this won't help you and may actually increase your change of being held liable. For example: >...A Beware of Dog sign may or may not count as protection against lawsuits. In Alabama, the court is likely to co
252.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
You can see the cost differences here: https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-... Rooftops are unused space, but the land use is generally a small part of the cost. Utility scale solar has real ec
253.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
Rooftop solar is far more expensive than solar put on land. The cost of rooftop solar (particularly homeowner solar) is usually hidden by implementing a big subsidy to wealthy consumers that is paid for by less wealthy consumers - sort of
254.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>...They used wax pencils, or crayons as we call them, until they got the space pen technology without spending on it. It looks like both the Soviet Union and NASA got their pens from Fisher: >...the Fisher pen was developed using pri
255.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>We didn't have conscription in WW1, ... There was a military draft in WW I: >...By the end of World War I, some two million men volunteered for various branches of the armed services, and some 2.8 million had been drafted. http
256.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>…See the total cost of the energy produced (integrating capacity/load factors): https://www.lazard.com/perspective/lcoe2020 From your lazard source on levelized costs, take a look at the Unsubsidized Levelized
257.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
The 79 oil crisis and rationing was caused by the disruption of oil from the Iran, but the US suffered much more from the disruption of the oil from Iran than other countries that also relied on this oil. It would be wrong to ignore the rol
258.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>> capacity factor >Is way less a criteria for production units not consuming any fuel (wind, solar...) not waste. Not really. Capacity factor affects everything about a power source - it is stilly to pretend it is not a big deal.
259.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>...wind resources alone are sufficient to provide baseline power production If I recall, the paper was based on wind data for 1 year. Unclear how much variability there is over time or will be in the future with climate change. The es
260.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>Compare with renewables: 790GW already running (26% of the gridpower), Something to remember here is that the vast majority of that 26% is hydroelectric (maybe 18% or so). Wind and solar provide only a few percent of the power that is
261.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
It is misleading to talk about solar when there is utility grid solar which provides low cost power and consumer rooftop solar which does not. Rooftop solar was never, is not and will not ever be cheap and yet is usually highly promoted by
262.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
The subsidies for nuclear likely saved more than a million lives that would have been lost to air pollution if the industry did not exist and coal had been used instead. One might argue those subsidies were a good value for money - if you
263.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
Your post seems to imply that solar and wind have not been heavily subsidized. >Solar + wind arent the same or cheaper, theyre much cheaper. Wind has received many different government subsidies over time. The GAO found 82 different typ
264.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
>...We’ll probably muddle through with fossil + renewables for a while, which is the cheapest combo. Only cheapest since the externalized costs of fossil fuels are not accounted for. >...Nukes are getting more expensive not less, so I
265.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
I haven't seen an estimate done for the US, but for Germany one estimate is that to rely on solar and wind would require about 6,000 pumped storage plants which is literally 183 times their current capacity. https://www.eco
266.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
You might want to contact the Mayo Clinic (particularly at the MN location) and see if they have what you are looking for. For example, they tend to do programs for executives where they get a comprehensive physical over a few days: http
267.
▲
by
opo
4y ago
There were obviously billionaires back then. For example, J. Paul Getty was worth an estimated 6 billion when he died in 1976. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Paul_Getty
268.
▲
by
opo
5y ago
The panels installed on the White House were not photovoltaic solar panels - they were solar water heater panels.
269.
▲
by
opo
5y ago
The 79 oil crisis and rationing was caused by the disruption of oil from the Iran, but the US suffered much more from the disruption of the oil from Iran than other countries that also relied on this oil. It would be wrong to ignore the rol
270.
▲
by
opo
5y ago
>...Also the incident in Chernobyl was 99% a political problem, not a technical one. The Chernobyl design was dangerous enough it would have been illegal to build in any other country.
More ›