opello

8 ms·

91.
by opello 11mo ago
And they can be hidden, so it's not exactly entirely up to them, nor should it be. If they wanted them in the video content they could put them there.
92.
by opello 11mo ago
It seems neatly organized to say "that we can explain all brain activity" and yet not necessarily bound exactly what is "brain activity." I think prior to recent research [1] people would have concluded that memory was
93.
by opello 11mo ago
I also enjoyed reading through it, but wish I'd seen this comment first and avoided missing out on the moment of success too. :)
94.
by opello 11mo ago
Seems right to me, same link as in the PDF's Data Availability section.
95.
by opello 11mo ago
> Their mother had held on to the comic books since she and her brother bought them between the Great Depression and the beginning of World War Two, Heritage said. It seems unlikely that in that time frame it would have been a 5 digit pu
96.
by opello 11mo ago
It was also a really nice MythTV frontend at some point which was easier to set up than additional home theater PCs that connected to the central PVR.
97.
by opello 11mo ago
It is strange, cursory digging for an explanation was a little more complex than I bargained for... https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.17/fs/binfmt_scrip... I think it makes it to calling ope
98.
by opello 11mo ago
I did a little digging and found that the `|| eno == ENOENT` was added quite a bit earlier[1] than the actual pathprog lookup[2]. While I could find the "issue discussion" for the pathprog change[3] I wasn't able to find it
99.
by opello 11mo ago
> I take a slightly more narrow definition of “thoughts” that may be more akin to “expressions” - ideas that can be communicated, so excluding non-linguistic mental processes. I was glad to read this because it seemed too neat and tidy f
100.
by opello 11mo ago
> There are also other kinds of compound nouns, where the compound noun does not have the meaning of its component words Wouldn't cranberry morphemes be good examples this type of relationship? I don't know if, in the eponymou
101.
by opello 11mo ago
Enter: the morpheme
102.
by opello 11mo ago
That was excellent, thanks for sharing it! I enjoyed the appearance of the Cray X-MP.
103.
by opello 11mo ago
As much as I like PuTTY the ergonomics for "monitor this port as I plug/unplug the USB-to-Serial adapter" are so much better in TeraTerm.
104.
by opello 11mo ago
I was thinking MPEG-1 until around 1996 when MPEG-2 adds interlaced and transport stream support, among other things. But you're right, MPEG bitrates for quality were too high for what I was thinking. More like QuickTime Video or Sma
105.
by opello 11mo ago
> This site was paused as it reached its usage limits. https://web.archive.org/web/20251111071832/https://www.bwplo...
106.
by opello 11mo ago
> Which is why zooming and panning exist. Which loses fidelity in your raster format screenshot world. Alternatively, when text is presented as text, a user can scale it independently for readability. Or as another commenter pointed ou
107.
by opello 11mo ago
> In 1994-1995, all the pieces for digital cinema were there, but they weren't integrated, and there were no installed projectors. I agree with that. The article's quote from Pixar's "Making The Cut at Pixar" bo
108.
by opello 11mo ago
David Simon talked about this for the HD release of The Wire: https://davidsimon.com/the-wire-hd-with-videos/ It seems like the video examples are unfortunately now unavailable, but the discussion is still interesting
109.
by opello 11mo ago
> He [David DiFrancesco] broke ground in film printing — specifically, in putting digital images on analog film. > Their system was fairly straightforward. Every frame of Toy Story ’s negative was exposed, three times, in front of a
110.
by opello 11mo ago
This is an interesting take when you look at the gas station Toy Story example and consider the night sky. In the digital version the stars are very washed out but in the film version the sky is dark and it's easy to appreciate the st
111.
by opello 11mo ago
I bumped on this too, since 1994-1995 was about the time when multi-gigabyte hard drives were readily available and multiple full motion video codecs were being used in games, albeit for cut scenes. Theater projector compatibility makes co
112.
by opello 11mo ago
This was a good comment thread on which brands or markets had what with regard to hydroxyapatite: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36564190
113.
by opello 1y ago
There wasn't an argument per se, but an attempt to point out a possibly, similarly politically-influenced miscarriage of justice. It may be a non sequitur to suggest that the pardon of one convicted financial criminal is similar to the
114.
by opello 1y ago
Some form of fraud for misrepresenting the risk that the mortgages that were bundled together, seems like the obvious answer. But I'm not a forensic accountant or someone with the nuanced legal understanding to define a charge here.
115.
by opello 1y ago
Yes, exactly, and yet I don't think there has been much in the way of charges brought against those responsible for fraudulently rating the securities.
116.
by opello 1y ago
This was part of my point and a nuance I appreciate as well, and that the pardon resonates for me with the apparent lack of charges for those responsible for the financial crisis.
117.
by opello 1y ago
Is there a place for a logical counter-point in there not having been charges against people responsible for the 2008 financial crisis? It seems like a selective enforcement of rules or consequences in both situations to me.
118.
by opello 1y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45520037 I was mistaken and ultimately recognized that as well as being told I misidentified the antecedent of your "As stated it's wrong."
119.
by opello 1y ago
> You misunderstood that comment. You are absolutely right, I misread that entirely. Thanks. I also misattributed the original comment and the follow-up to the same author. The problem with pursuing "identity" is that these r
120.
by opello 1y ago
> I didn't "restate the premise", I said it was wrong, and added information. You originally wrote: > Btw, the upside-down-rook trick is illegal in serious play. You followed up to my asking for an explanation why with:

More ›