opello

4 ms·

31.
by opello 5mo ago
I did dig into this a bit more the other day and learned that the "main RF can" is the cesium oscillator module. The history there was pretty interesting! The early ones I found were the Symmetricom Quantum SA.45s[1,2] which inc
32.
by opello 5mo ago
I do get that, this era of automation is too responsive to not go public to provoke action. I think I might just be wistful of an era in which the alternate path might have made a difference. Sorry to pile on.
33.
by opello 5mo ago
I realize you've been championing this idea in the thread, and I admire it because I also recognize the misdirected blame. Please understand I do not harbor "blame" for the researchers. > Their job is to bring information
34.
by opello 5mo ago
> Should a security researcher that identifies a vulnerability in electron.js need to identify _every_ possible project using electron.js to communicate with them the vulnerability exists? No. That's absurd. But this is a false comp
35.
by opello 5mo ago
It strikes me as strange that the article links to [1] which appears to be the same board, absent the "Viavi" logo on the main RF can, as the Microchip product you linked. I couldn't tell with a brief look if the Viavi produ
36.
by opello 5mo ago
> I agree with the article, FastCGI is better than HTTP for these things. If this is what you mean to identify as claiming FastCGI and HTTP are generally interchangeable, and are rising to correct, I'll also offer that "agree w
37.
by opello 5mo ago
You didn't though. You may have intended to? The article points out that HTTP and FastCGI are both options for reverse proxies to communicate to the downstream server. I didn't find a reference to them being interchangeable outs
38.
by opello 5mo ago
While not formally reviewing code like this, I read a lot of it for fun. When it's clear and understandable, it's more educational and enjoyable. If the PoC code can also serve as a means of communication, that seems like an ext
39.
by opello 6mo ago
It seems like "jargon" fits the need for a way to label the more specific meaning intended, like "property from objected oriented programming jargon." I think programmers might differ without the more specific descripti
40.
by opello 7mo ago
I think it's a good introduction to quantization generally and specifically in how it applies to reducing LLMs. But I also think it should say something about LLMs or "AI" in the title (as even the article is tagged AI on th
41.
by opello 7mo ago
I assume, at least for me, it's because I typed them in many, many more times.
42.
by opello 7mo ago
Thanks, it wasn't out of doubt that I asked, but it seemed having a reference to point at would help resolve the contention. The Docker blog post covered a lot more detail, even about WSL2, which was really informative and I hadn&#x27
43.
by opello 7mo ago
Is there a way to visualize this on a running system or some documentation that describes it? I'm not familiar with the plumbing here but did try to find some documentation.
44.
by opello 7mo ago
This was discussed in Advent of Computing episode 150 "Starting Windows Up"[1,2] and the timeline of a 1983 demo which showed overlapping windows and multitasking, but also highlighted the contrast to the DR4 build from late 1984
45.
by opello 8mo ago
In the above case, since this touches the local repo, wouldn't a .gitconfig include.path be a better option? Just in case it's unclear, you'd then set an excludesFile in the included file to the path to a file like jj.gitigno
46.
by opello 8mo ago
I really liked the Motorola Droid family of slider keyboards, also horizontal. Made for a very handy, pocket ssh terminal.
47.
by opello 8mo ago
Okay, but they're not like styropyro on YouTube here... presumably the DHS people are using the whatever government weapons contractor made device, which is going to come with more nuance, controls, targeting system, etc. than whatever
48.
by opello 8mo ago
I may have foolishly accepted the premise of incompetence in posing my question. Basically it seemed to me like the complaint was untrained/experienced (incompetent) people were deciding/deploying the fancy laser munition. That
49.
by opello 8mo ago
Really making you wonder why does DHS have direct access to this hardware?
50.
by opello 8mo ago
Certainly. But you're missing the point. Feynman chose to tell the stories to Ralph Leighton who then recorded them in the "Surely" book which was published in 1985, well after Feynman's own perspective seems to have c
51.
by opello 8mo ago
> I do not think Feynman was celebrating his activity in the book. The argument presented in the video about this is that these are the stories Feynman edited and reworked over time, and shared with his friend Ralph Leighton, who then re
52.
by opello 8mo ago
> misogynistic behaviors were cultural at the time, I agree they're abhorrent but people are embedded in their culture. The same is said of Hitchcock, (as an example) and his behaviour was unacceptable by todays standards. We'v
53.
by opello 8mo ago
That's the TSSOP version, while the DIP is $0.92: https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/microchip-technol... I'd prefer even the SOIC version which is $0.69 if I'm soldering it: https:&#x
54.
by opello 8mo ago
It seems like sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't, and I can only imagine popularity is somehow the reason.
55.
by opello 8mo ago
https://community.zyxel.com/en/discussion/23595/why-i-get-bl... Seems like you or someone upstream of you uses a Zyxel brand device that has some kind of dns content filtering enabled. You should be able to
56.
by opello 8mo ago
Or at least not readily armed, bullet in the shirt pocket and all.
57.
by opello 8mo ago
> One way or the other, local culture is to do this. Yes, I agree it’s a negative sum choice. But they like it. It’s the same school of thought where a prison abolitionist didn’t report her gang rape: https://www.thenation.com
58.
by opello 8mo ago
The surface level answer is "for Ronald Reagan reasons": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_Conversion_Act
59.
by opello 8mo ago
You have to be able to fit those 10 100mL bottles into a single 1 quart resealable bag. At most you'd probably get about 9.46 of those 10 bottles in the bag but in practice it's fewer still. 1 US liquid quart is about 946.353 mil
60.
by opello 8mo ago
The about link above gave a Cloudfront-looking failure, but the base domain here worked and is where the app help link takes me, albeit to /faq: https://sonelli.com/ I reactivated my license a few months ago using the

More ›