oojacoboo

7 ms·

31.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
the change is going to be made... I thought it was cheeky... but people don't get it, it's a FAIL, I realize ;)
32.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
that makes me :)
33.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
We charge $1 per transaction, and have thought about 1.50, but we like the solid $1 number. We'll play that out and see how it works for a while. As per the pricing for the software, we know it's cheap and will be considering price hikes i
34.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
for the large operations with massive numbers of properties that where people are old school that make the decisions, this is absolutely the case. There are a large number of 200 and less companies and owners that are quite tech savvy and
35.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
we won't get entire market saturation over night, no. So, yes, you are right, there are technical hurdles, but we believe that the market is large enough right now, at it's current state to support this company. Our competitors agree, and
36.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
YES, but there are SERIOUS issues to doing this with regards to payments. You essentially have to be a registered bank or approved status in order to aggregate payments in order to support this. It's very complicated, expensive, and there
37.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
We've considered a very small free plan, and will think more on that. As per the rent collection for these accounts, it doesn't become profitable for us at these smaller numbers, so this is why the $9 plan exists.
38.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
you would think this is the case, and yes, an on the ground sales team will be helpful in addition to our affiliate program and partnerships, but these days are starting to phase out. These people are starting to realize they can't operate
39.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
day here, day there, all adds up, the application has thousands of files... these things just take time.
40.
Ask HN: Review RentPost.com(rentpost.com)
179 points by oojacoboo 16y ago|247 comments
41.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
thanks guys, lets hope so :)
42.
by oojacoboo 16y ago
ha, wow, na, actually, that stock comes from istockphoto, they used it way more like the original