Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
onyva
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
301.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
The stubbing happened in public during a pride event in Jerusalem. Daylight. The shooting in the youth club was of a guy who burst in and gunned them down. Israel does not allow same sex marriage and having your right recognized l, if you g
302.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Israel is probably one of the few countries other than the USA were LGBTQ+ people were attacked and killed in public or in private spaces. An ashkenazi religious Jew stabbed and killed a girl in a gay pride event in Jerusalem, and the gover
303.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
+1
304.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
So we have “Fox News” for tech news now? It reads like a Fox News hit piece with anecdotes served up to proof something they need their audience to believe regardless of the truth. Beautiful.
305.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
No wonder Drumpf’s “hair” is not responding... It’s either a wig, or he’s clueless of the circumstances.
306.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
What a euro centric oblivious type of pseudo academic indulgence. I guess what we need to take from that is that colonialists we’re really busy people, entrepreneurs doing really important things, so this is the kind of perspective into the
307.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Basically every reasoning they give for why Brave is not as bad as it seems, seems to demonstrate exactly that point. Literally. Starting with “they clearly state in their privacy policy that their ads do not track you”. Great. Sure. Argum
308.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Because the real protection chrome users need is from chrome itself and google. This helps I guess but what’s the point if google sucks up everything about you regardless?
309.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Love the innocent “received very positive press reviews” It remember being force to read about Brave in any article about the web, especially when the click bait title actually mentioned its competition. Untrustworthy, and not just In their
310.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
When this started Oracle was the evil one. Now we have your run of the mill predatory capitalism vs a particularly nasty and dangerous form of surveillance capitalism, which makes oracle look harmless.
311.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Also on Turris with knot-resolver and adblock... is there a reason to outsource blocking really? Why trust nextdns? Isn’t going to be a subscription based service once out of beta?
312.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
if you care about privacy you’d be better off with Mozilla Firefox. Brave is just a Trojan horse for Eich’s ambition to replace google as an ad broker. With a meaningless market share it’s not likely but still, it’s important to know what B
313.
▲
Migrating from Docker to Podman
(qulogic.gitlab.io)
3 points
by
onyva
7y ago
|
0 comments
314.
▲
German and French anarchists present at the violent riots in Barcelona
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
onyva
7y ago
|
0 comments
315.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Companies are not neutral entities. People work there and have values. If a company thinks it’s ok to serve people that commit crimes against humanity, in the case of ICE and the Drumpf administration, than they have a serious problem. Mayb
316.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Isn't it easier to set it up with wireguard? I’ve recently set up my turris running “adblock” (openwrt) natively with only wireguard open, connecting from my laptop, ipad and iPhone, which seems to me to be a far lighter and easier se
317.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
"...it compromised its commitment to open source software, partnering with Microsoft to put Windows on the XO-1." apropos https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21045765
318.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
BTW, it should be translated: "his" foundation. "Sa" refers to the foundation, which is feminine in French.
319.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
From what I understand, the problem with gates and other philanthro-capitalists is that they have the power to shift focus of organizations (research and administration) from what’s actually needed, to their own priorities. Ie giving money
320.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Creepy. And Facebook of all should be banned from selling such products legally. There are enough stupid consumer who’d think it’s a good idea.
321.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Hope people will take from this that the money they spend on purchasing Silicon Valley products (as well as any really) can have a real effect on their lives. Latest example for me is supporting Brave, which can have a detrimental effect on
322.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
It’s interesting that in Israel there’s a big revival of Arabic music interpreted by 2nd 3rd generation Israelites, (who grow up with this music at home but had no other exposure in media, because of the complete dominance and mostly enforc
323.
▲
What's new in Firefox for iOS (version 19)
(support.mozilla.org)
1 points
by
onyva
7y ago
|
0 comments
324.
▲
Trump: 'unfair' about Eich (2014)
(politico.com)
1 points
by
onyva
7y ago
|
0 comments
325.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
It's a risk we probably need to take. AdTech is monetizing hate and this is already effecting the real world in a very obvious way. We're talking about ads, not content. Removing the monetization incentive is one thing, the wastef
326.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Part of a premium package. I would pay for something like NextDNS as part of a NextCloud based storage and apps, for example.
327.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Which is not needed. Would love to see Breitbart, YouTube, Facebook and other similar hate-monetization platforms die. We don't have to commit collective social suicide in order to accommodate silicon valley.
328.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
Ads are not of interest to users. I think their display is a waste of time and resources, as well as the risks associated. How blocking ads make a browser “misaligned” with users? It’s in fact the opposite. Brave is simply, like stated bef
329.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
I understand that but I do think it should be something Mozilla should offer, even if it’s a premium service only. The web should not be held hostage by AdTech imho, and as a non for profit Mozilla should be able to generate revenue (and be
330.
▲
by
onyva
7y ago
I don't see that with Firefox. Google "blocking" ads in Chrome is of course not serious and not something that's done to protect users. Mozilla is not an ad company like Google (or the wanna be new Google, Brave). But I
More ›