onurcel

9 ms·

31.
by onurcel 5y ago
then why they don't beg for editors? they also have enough cash to develop a more appealing editor experience, but all they are asking is money.
32.
by onurcel 5y ago
The comments here lack so much nuance that if it wasn't HN, I would wonder if they were not made by a trolling farm. A few years ago I created a SaaS product, and as a newcomer in the market, I was happy that (online) marketing existed
33.
by onurcel 5y ago
Here is the best PCA explanation I ever read on the web: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/2691/making-sense-...
34.
by onurcel 5y ago
that's funny. I have a project of recovering a game I wrote on Commodore 64 as a kid. It is saved on an audio tape. You can guess I have a strong motivation since it's for getting back something personal. I have the wav files read
35.
by onurcel 6y ago
thanks! yes it's a small custom script
36.
by onurcel 6y ago
That's really nice! I like it. I also built a minimalist ui tool a while ago [0] so I totally understand where you are coming from. Mine never really took off probably due the lack of interest of minimalism at that time, but there may
37.
by onurcel 6y ago
great idea! thanks for sharing this. Recently I noticed I get better suggestions when I am logged out [0]. I am still convinced someone could implement a recommendation system that can suggest more interesting videos based on my history. An
38.
Ask HN: Why YouTube suggestions are better when I am logged off?
24 points by onurcel 6y ago|23 comments
39.
by onurcel 6y ago
Exactly. I work on Laser2, the approach is the same as Laser [0], Laser2 performs better on some low resource languages. A more ELI5 explanation would be something like this: Laser is an encoder/decoder architecture trained as a transl
40.
by onurcel 6y ago
I like the idea but I don't really get why they accept "statistically insignificant" results. What I expect from a scientific paper is to prove (even emprically) something. For example, if a paper claims something like "
41.
by onurcel 6y ago
Thank you for the great article. I believe there is a typo in "we assign a value of 0 to p(x) log p(x) when x=0", it should be "when p(x) = 0".
42.
Holographic optics for thin and lightweight virtual reality(research.fb.com)
344 points by onurcel 6y ago|104 comments
43.
by onurcel 6y ago
Imagine that combined with this: https://onezero.medium.com/the-morning-paper-revisited-35b40...
44.
by onurcel 6y ago
awesome
45.
by onurcel 6y ago
The fact they put some disclaimer after bragging doesn't discredit the point of the author who says those companies brag with AI but still fail to fulfil basic queries.
46.
by onurcel 6y ago
The point of the OP is that they claim they understand everything. Example: https://www.blog.google/products/search/search-language-unde...
47.
by onurcel 7y ago
It looks nice. It would be nice to have the ability to fine-tune the model to your own source code. Is that on the roadmap?
48.
by onurcel 7y ago
If you want to experiment with question tag prediction on your laptop, you can also play with fastText : https://fasttext.cc/docs/en/supervised-tutorial.html
49.
by onurcel 8y ago
Deciding if feeding the media with fear was worth the attention you will get wasn't easy, ha. Let me tell you, you are the shame of the profession.
50.
by onurcel 8y ago
when the heat of "the moment" lasts 20 years, the least we can say is it's about time.
51.
by onurcel 8y ago
It's so unfortunate that the author didn't feel much the need of humility. He worked on some pretty cool stuff, it could have been great to present it differently.
52.
Everybody Dance Now(youtube.com)
1 points by onurcel 8y ago|0 comments
53.
by onurcel 8y ago
And this is what inspired Rob Hubbard for the music of Delta game (related video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jn2h6f1EO2k )
54.
C++ Will No Longer Have Pointers(fluentcpp.com)
9 points by onurcel 9y ago|2 comments
55.
by onurcel 9y ago
The Gompertz–Makeham law the author uses, actually allows also to modelize the accidental death rate. I don't know how hard it is to fit this additionnal parameter with real-world data though.
56.
by onurcel 9y ago
Is
57.
by onurcel 9y ago
This is awesome. Are there any video of the presentation at EC'16 ?
58.
by onurcel 9y ago
http://coding-geek.com/how-shazam-works/
59.
Is the Public Transport Company Fooling You?(onurcelebi.com)
4 points by onurcel 9y ago|0 comments
60.
by onurcel 9y ago
Making the Internet Archive’s blog faster

More ›